07-01-2019 08:14 AM
How do I file a claim and get my money back on an item that was never delivered to me because it was misdelivered? IF I file an INR, eBay will revert to the tracking info which shows "Item delivered at mailbox." It wasn't.
To preemptively answer the typical questions: No one else in the household, I checked mailbox within 40-minutes of the time it was stamped as delivered, their are no porch pirates in this neighborhood and they certainly would not have been around at the time it shows delivered as it was a torrential downpour and no none of the neighbors have it.
I checked with the USPS and the GPS tracking shows that the item was scanned delivered on a different street than mine. So the USPS messed up the delivery and isn't the seller responsible for their shipper and any errors?
I have contacted the seller and heard nothing in response. Seem like I have already expended energy that the seller should have done?
So how do I work within the eBay system to get a refund?
07-11-2019 01:39 PM
@klhmdg wrote:
I also keep see that the "seller" chose USPS. As far as I know the seller picks a shipping company BUT the "buyer" can choose the cheapest media mail OR upgrade to have insurance.
eBay is allowing "buyers" to choose shipping methods now.
The buyer has final say on how much $ they spend on shipping. USPS should be on the hook for the misdelivered package and had the buyer purchased insurance on the item USPS would be.
We can theorize about all of the possibilities here, but the fact is that in this case there was no "choice" of shipper or method - one size fit all.
Plus unless eBay changes things and allows the buyer to directly contract with the shipping company, then the seller is still responsible for the performance of its agent or subcontractor - the shipper.
07-11-2019 02:18 PM
@green-night wrote:
This is like hiring a Plumber to install a new electric hot water tank. The installation requires new electric lines, so the Plumber hires a licensed electrician to run the lines. You the homeowner have no hand in selecting the electrician. So the electrician is the Plumber's "agent" or subcontractor. But unfortunately the electrician mess up the installation and the water tank doesn't work. Who are you going to go after? Or are you going to take the loss because it wasn't the Plumber's fault? After all the plumber ran the water lines correctly and installed the correct hot water tank, just the electrical lines were messed up, by the service the plumber hired. I guess from reading here, most people think that THEY should contact the electrician! WRONG! Your contract is with the Plumber and getting in the middle of his way of operating might deprive him of seeking remedies and thus make you liable for extra costs. The point is that who YOU HIRE IS RESPONSIBLE to get the job done, all parts. But then again, because it wasn't the Plumber's direct "fault" under the logic here, you should just eat the loss! Amazing!
Unfortunately the correct answer is what happened! The seller had to issue a full refund, per an ebay case! eBay should not be responsible for the mis-actions of the seller's agent!
There are a couple of problems with your analogy.
#1 - IF the way it worked here in a case like yours was that the seller issues you a refund and then gets reimbursed by eBay then that would be perfectly fine with me. It DOESN'T work that way, however, and that is by eBay's design. If you have a problem with the process you have to go through to ultimately receive a refund in the situation then your beef is again with eBay and NOT your seller.
#2 - Whether or not YOU think eBay should or shouldn't be responsible for the sellers agent is completely irrelevant. eBay seller protection is something eBay offers its seller so who are you to say they shouldn't enjoy or take advantage of that very protection? Perhaps one day you will find yourself in the very same predicament and when it's your money on the line that eBay is willing to protect, then lets see how quick you are to forfeit it.
I don't see how my analogy is invalidated by your points? I think the analogy holds. The seller is still responsible for the actions of the subcontractor the seller hires!
#1 My beef is with a seller who does not respond to two polite emails about misdelivery. THEN only responded to the third because an eBay case was opened by eBay. And yes, as stated just recently, a misdelivered INR case should not be an iterative process. One should be able to file an INR with GPS data directly.
#2 I read the seller protection and the eBay wording could use some help. Me thinks what the seller protection is for is from those trying to scam and say an item wasn't delivered when it was. As I stated in a recent post, there is a difference between a "delivered" stamp and the USPS's GPS data showing the delivery was to the right address. Ebay will protect you and me from scammers, it apparently will not protect us from the variances of the shippers.
Perhaps one day I will find myself in the same predicament, when MY money is on the line? Look, I have been in many situations with MY MONEY on the line, even big money! In fact, I started selling naively and then started reading these boards. I was so scared with all of the SNAD claims etc that I almost stopped selling. But then I learned how to make a few changes. What I did was create a "cookie jar fund" to self insure the business against losses. The main focus of that was to have a reserve or contingency of funds set aside that I could use to provide refunds when "stuff happens!" Adding that to the business plan, taking a "tax" on each sale to help fund the reserve, sure made it easier to swallow losses when they occurred. It also help me to sleep at night!
So the way I view it is that a misdelivered item, by my agent, the shipper, is just like a false SNAD I have to eat. All part of the cost of selling retail!
I don't know about others, but I take customer service seriously! Once had a package headed up the East Coast that took a detour to Seattle! I guess WA is the new MA? Anyway, it took an extra week for the package to get delivered. I was in the PO checking on the progress, keeping the buyer informed and when all was said and done I issued a partial refund to the buyer for the shipping because he paid me for a service that neither one of us wanted or appreciated!
I had a situation where the buyer returned something on his own volition, without using the eBay process. Because I provide good customer service, I provided a full refund AND refunded the buyer's cost to ship the item back to me! Just a few examples of what I think eBay expects as creating a good buying experience!
All of these costs are just the cost of doing business! er, at least as I see it!
07-11-2019 02:32 PM
Tell your PO to get it back OR to note the delivery to the different address. Consider putting I a claim with the PO for "lost package" - that may prompt them to refund you or get the package back.
07-11-2019 02:38 PM
There is no room for interpretation regarding this issue.
eBay will protect a seller from an INR claim when tracking shows delivery to the buyers zip code for items under $750. Period.
Run your business as you see fit and if you feel like handing out refunds unnecessarily that is fantastic.
I'll take the seller protection.
(BTW, being able to upload GPS coordinates into the return process? Thanks for the laugh. )
07-11-2019 03:01 PM
@green-night wrote:There is no room for interpretation regarding this issue.
eBay will protect a seller from an INR claim when tracking shows delivery to the buyers zip code for items under $750. Period.
I'll take the seller protection.
Sorry, dad's not ripe ... er, that's not right. We've be warned many times:
while tracking information is the primary source we use for a case decision, we are able to offer protection if there is [e.g. GPS] evidence that an item was not delivered to the correct address.
So if
- something is wrong on the label,
- and it is not delivered to the buyer's address
- because of that issue (which the seller created)
- on the label (which the seller created),
eBay offers protection to the buyer in an INR case even when tracking shows delivered.
07-11-2019 03:06 PM
@coco9619 wrote:
@green-night wrote:There is no room for interpretation regarding this issue.
eBay will protect a seller from an INR claim when tracking shows delivery to the buyers zip code for items under $750. Period.
I'll take the seller protection.
Sorry, dad's not ripe ... er, that's not right. We've be warned many times:
while tracking information is the primary source we use for a case decision, we are able to offer protection if there is [e.g. GPS] evidence that an item was not delivered to the correct address.
So if
- something is wrong on the label,
- and it is not delivered to the buyer's address
- because of that issue (which the seller created)
- on the label (which the seller created),
eBay offers protection to the buyer in an INR case even when tracking shows delivered.
And this is why OP's tight-lipped seller paid for this INR.
THe quoted part only refers to protecting the buyer it doesn’t say it doesn’t still protect the seller. I didn’t think there was anything wrong with the sellers label in this case either ?
07-11-2019 03:10 PM
@coco9619 wrote:
@green-night wrote:There is no room for interpretation regarding this issue.
eBay will protect a seller from an INR claim when tracking shows delivery to the buyers zip code for items under $750. Period.
I'll take the seller protection.
Sorry, dad's not ripe ... er, that's not right. We've be warned many times:
while tracking information is the primary source we use for a case decision, we are able to offer protection if there is [e.g. GPS] evidence that an item was not delivered to the correct address.
So if
- something is wrong on the label,
- and it is not delivered to the buyer's address
- because of that issue (which the seller created)
- on the label (which the seller created),
eBay offers protection to the buyer in an INR case even when tracking shows delivered.
And this is why OP's tight-lipped seller paid for this INR.
And where does it say that it would be coming out of the sellers pocket?
How do you know OP's refund wasn't a courtesy?
07-11-2019 03:28 PM
BTW is there a link to that quote?
07-11-2019 03:44 PM
I had a buyer just recently file a claim for an item not received even though it shows that it was delivered. This was an $80 watch. He admitted that it was an old address and he had notified USPS to hold his mail at the office for pick up but they delivered it anyways. I told the buyer he had to work with his Post Office to retrieve his package, and I explained that I couldn't help him because Imwasn't responsible for his delivery issue. The buyer kept writing me because he felt that either Ebay or I should refund him. He contacted eBay and was told to file the INR claim. Of course, the claim was closed in my favor when I uploaded the tracking information, but the buyer was told by eBay to file an appeal so that he could get a courtesy refund. I checked and eBay actually did refund the buyer. This has happened several times in the past six months. I don't know if this could be a trend and if and when eBay will stop giving these credits. I know this same buyer also filed a claim for TV he didn't get.
07-11-2019 04:12 PM
I understand that is is upsetting not to get your purchase but I disagree that a seller should be responsible for assuring delivery to the correct address. We don't work for them nor can we control what happens once we ship. You are terribly mistaken if you believe that Fedex, UPS, and DHL don't screw up deliveries as they all do. Then there is this problem with porch thefts as well. I always print out my shipping labels on eBay and they are sent to the confirmed address. I also purchase insurance for damage or loss of my higher value or fragile packages. Sellers don't have any control of the packages once we mail them and that is why eBay doesn't force us to refund when it's mis-delivered or stolen. It isn't even reasonable to expect that it should be the seller's responsibility to account for human failure. The carrier Insurance won't pay either if the package tracking is shown as delivered. Your problem is with the post office over these screw ups. I mailed a package on July 8th to a buyer here in my state (CA) 60 miles away, and when checking the tracking today I saw that it was currently in Louisville KY which is over 2000 miles away from the buyer and me. That means it was put in the wrong bin at the Regional Sorting station. Try writing your congressman to see if they can clean up our Federal Mail system.
07-11-2019 05:21 PM
Why aren’t you doing as Trinton advised you instead of continuing to bash sellers with your ongoing tirade. Sellers did not enact this eBay policy and it was implemented to protect sellers You were given the correct answer right from the beginning. Ebay isn’t going to force the seller to refund you when they upload their delivery tracking information. If sellers became responsible for mis-deliveries and or porch thefts everyone would quite selling.
Suggesting that eBay ban small sellers in favor of big businesses is ridiculous as well. They aren’t going to refund you for mis-deliveries or porch thefts either. Everyone had told you what the current policy is and what you needed to do. Continuing to flame readers because you don’t like their opinions is a waste of time. This is a human problem because people screw up and whether you like it or not all shipping carriers are a service. They are Not our employees or agents. Your plumber analogy is apples and oranges as sellers didn’t go out and hire them. We pay for a Federally controlled shipping service. Meanwhile there are those who are adding another one to their BB list. Your seller had to respond to your claim because you opened a case. But they can’t do anything to help you and it will be closed in their favor.
07-11-2019 05:52 PM - edited 07-11-2019 05:56 PM
@lightlily_arts wrote:Why aren’t you doing as Trinton advised you instead of continuing to bash sellers with your ongoing tirade.
Ebay isn’t going to force the seller to refund you when they upload their delivery tracking information.
Unfortunately, eBay forced the seller to refund this INR case because
It doesn't matter why the tracking number was misdelivered, whether
- it was a label issue,
- a carrier error, or
- something else:
If the buyer provides evidence, or eBay obtains (ha!) evidence, of delivery to another address even in the same city or zipcode, the seller loses protection from INR.
Decision:
This case has been decided in your favor.
Comments:
We didn't receive valid tracking information from the seller. We're sorry you had a problem with your purchase, and we're issuing you a refund for this case.
And that's what happened here.
07-11-2019 08:46 PM
Hmm, sad to see that kind of buyer unfriendly reply! There is no seller protection when GPS data shows the seller's shipper delivered to the wrong address. I think Trinton essentially said that in his reply. But sounds like you are willing to stick it to any of your buyers when your shipping company messes up. Why are you so hostile toward buyers? Why would you stick it to them when they did nothing wrong? SMH
Also sad to see another seller saying customer friendly refunds are unnecessary. Me thinks is this the kind of legacy seller that eBay quietly wishes would just go away! I suspect 80% of eBay's problems are from that 20% of legacy sellers that have a seller is always right attitude.
I'm not laughing.
07-11-2019 08:51 PM
@green-night wrote:And where does it say that it would be coming out of the sellers pocket?
How do you know OP's refund wasn't a courtesy?
Because I am telling you that the funds came directly out of the seller's PP account!
The first answer is in the statements made by the blues! It is just a standard fairness issue - who takes the hit?
07-11-2019 08:55 PM
@lightlily_arts wrote:I had a buyer just recently file a claim for an item not received even though it shows that it was delivered. This was an $80 watch. He admitted that it was an old address and he had notified USPS to hold his mail at the office for pick up but they delivered it anyways. I told the buyer he had to work with his Post Office to retrieve his package, and I explained that I couldn't help him because Imwasn't responsible for his delivery issue. The buyer kept writing me because he felt that either Ebay or I should refund him. He contacted eBay and was told to file the INR claim. Of course, the claim was closed in my favor when I uploaded the tracking information, but the buyer was told by eBay to file an appeal so that he could get a courtesy refund. I checked and eBay actually did refund the buyer. This has happened several times in the past six months. I don't know if this could be a trend and if and when eBay will stop giving these credits. I know this same buyer also filed a claim for TV he didn't get.
Well the courtesy refund is eBay's choice to make. Clearly in the situation that you described the buyer was at fault. I believe TOS clearly states that buy is responsible to get the correct address in the order window/page.