cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading

We recently had three item not as described cases opened on orders made by 0 feedback freight forwarder buyers sending orders to Chinese forwarding companies. The following ensued:

 

  1. Buyer opens Item not as described case claiming scratches, doesn't perform etc.
  2. Buyer returns an empty envelope or box
  3. We escalate the case with Ebay FB team as they agreed freight forwarded orders aren't eligible for MBG.
  4. Buyer successfully overturns each ruling with the reason "Seller agreed to provide refund but did not". Ebay FB team clarifies as long as return tracking provided on an ebay label is successfully returned then the buyer is entitled to a refund.
  5. We ask for clarification on ebay MBG FAQ, where exclusions for MBG include "The buyer used third party freight forwarding or mail redirection." Ebay FB team clarifies this is only for if the buyer wants the item returned from the forwarded country i.e China. 
  6. We're left holding the bag on these orders when we could have issued 50% restocking fee. Either way buyer keeps his funds and the item. 

Policy link here with screenshot below

hs_tech_1-1728499222928.png

 

Is this correct that MBG is still valid for forwarders as long as they use the Ebay provided return label? I'm surprised Ebay didn't include this note when mentioning on the exclusions list or reworded the excerpt above. We opened up forwarding orders after reviewing the FAQ but it looks like we're mistaken, and based on what I've seen other sellers recommend per this FAQ, many of you are also mistaken. 

Message 1 of 94
latest reply
93 REPLIES 93

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading

My point being that exact post doesn't add anything of value to us as sellers. We will have to agree to disagree. Most of your posts are just re-hashing the same thing with common sense which, apologies for being terse, but it doesn't help anyone. OP is still screwed and anyone who gets scammed by a forwarder is still screwed. Worse is OP can't even cancel without going against ebay policy so even if OP saw the future of getting scammed, what should OP do then?  

 

I think if the ebay community member wastingtime tagged can post here if we can or cannot cancel forwarder orders for address issues or offer address alternatives then would that at least establish appropriate next steps. I saw one member comment on an older thread that they contact ebay help to ask them if they can cancel and they typically get the approval to do so but I would never trust first level reps to present accurate information as Ive seen them change their response case by case in the same week.

Message 76 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading

Feel free to ignore my posts if they add no value for you.  The same is not true for others.  Besides it was an update to the efforts of trying to get the policy more clearly stated.  I hadn't posted about it in several days, not that I owe an explanation, but that is why I repeated myself today.

 

Cancelling a transaction is a different thing that I've said anything about today.  Up thread I'm sure I did.  

 

"I think if the ebay community member wastingtime tagged can post here if we can or cannot cancel forwarder orders for address issues or offer address alternatives then would that at least establish appropriate next steps. "  While this may seem to be a logical fix to the issue, Ebay isn't going to do that.  That would fly in the face of Ebay's efforts to curb BBE [bad buying experiences].  It is not against the rules for an international buyer to use a FF to ship their item to their country.  Sellers can't block this type of transaction either.

 

Most transactions go off without any issue at all.  But as in any other kind of transaction on this site, there are bad actors out there and they come in the form of both buyers and sellers.


mam98031  •  Volunteer Community Member  •  Buyer/Seller since 1999
Message 77 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading



A seller does not ship internationally and their listing states this.

 

The is no valid reason for choosing to not send to a known FF so eBay may penalize you for not doing so.

 

If you are scammed you have no protection unless the buyer admits they use a FF.

 

If a buyer is looking to scam you why would they tell you, yes I am using a FF?

 

If a item is valued at over $650 then it is required in order for seller to be protected you must receive signature confirmation.  If you send by Restricted Delivery to make sure only the addressee receives the item then this is a problem because you were suppose know that the addressee would not be available to receive item?  

 


@robbie31415 wrote:

Doing what you are suggesting is adding a term that isn't part of eBays policy so I'd consider it against policy.

 

 

If someone is 18 and buys a video game from me and I add adult signature so it gets returned back.  Should I be like HA, you don't get your item or money. MBG voided.

 


That is a good point.  It really depends on what you are sending if a person needs to be 21 for a Restricted Delivery.  There are various Restricted Deliveries available that do not have a age requirement.

 

Anyway my thoughts are just out of concern to stopping known scams that have been going on for years without any seemly workable solutions.

Message 78 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading

When a buyer uses a FF, the seller is NOT shipping internationally.  You are shipping to a US address.  

 

Most transactions using a FF go just fine.  Just as in any other kind of transactions on Ebay there are always some bad actors, both sellers and buyers.

 

"If you are scammed you have no protection unless the buyer admits they use a FF."  You don't have to prove they used an FF, you have to try and get some proof the item was reshipped.  It doesn't matter if it was by a FF or the lady down the street.  It is you need to prove it was reshipped.  Not always an easy thing to prove.

 

However if they open an INAD, you approve it and issue the return label.  That label isn't going to do the buyer much good as it is to be coming from the address you shipped to, not where the item is now.  The buyer would have to pay to ship it back to you.  When you get the package, you now have proof that the package was reshipped.  Refund them for the product, not the shipping or any fees you don't get refunded.

 

Your assuming that all these transactions are bad.  That simply isn't true.  It is a small amount that are bad.  And it is the buyer that is doing the bad stuff not the FF.

 

As I previously explained, I just can't see using Restricted Delivery working out for you.  More likely to get you in trouble with Ebay because you are doing something that you know can't be done.


mam98031  •  Volunteer Community Member  •  Buyer/Seller since 1999
Message 79 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading

I get it.

 

You guys are trying to find ways to decrease fraud but really eBay doesn't allow that. They do it on their end and if it passes for them then the seller is notified to ship the item.

 

Sometimes the fraud system is delayed and eBay sends the notification that they 'cancelled' due to issues with buyers account. However, I find those notifications very rare.

 

Ebays doesn't have policies barring international buyers. The only thing eBay doesn't force is the seller shipping internationally.

 

When a buyer uses a FF they are abiding the terms only requesting the seller ship to a domestic address (if seller has international shipping turned off).

 

You also have to remember that you don't know it's fraud. It's all speculation.

 

For protections you have the same as you do for non F-F users. You can deduct 50% of the refund if eligible.

 

Also returns labels of the seller are only required to be domestic. So they would have to forward the item back.

Message 80 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading


@mam98031 wrote:

 

Your assuming that all these transactions are bad.  That simply isn't true.  It is a small amount that are bad.  And it is the buyer that is doing the bad stuff not the FF.

 


I don't assume that at all.  In fact look at my posting history and see what just a few minutes I posted about a FF in Doral Fl.  I have have very good success with FF.  

 

I have only had two items lost using FF and guess what, it was eBay shipping services that lost the items.

Message 81 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading

50% refund  deduction if  eligible   ,doesn't help  when a buyer   damages   merchandise  beyond  repairs ,to total   loss  to the trash can .   

 

Message 82 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading


@carlmarxx wrote:

50% refund  deduction if  eligible   ,doesn't help  when a buyer   damages   merchandise  beyond  repairs ,to total   loss  to the trash can .   

 


How is that unique to FF?

 

What if someone from California damages your item beyond repair.

 

Are you trying to say people in California should get more protection?

 

If no, then you are making a completely separate argument where you think eBay needs to modify seller protections as a whole.

 

Probably better to create a new thread.

Message 83 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading


@stephenmorgan wrote:

@mam98031 wrote:

 

Your assuming that all these transactions are bad.  That simply isn't true.  It is a small amount that are bad.  And it is the buyer that is doing the bad stuff not the FF.

 


I don't assume that at all.  In fact look at my posting history and see what just a few minutes I posted about a FF in Doral Fl.  I have have very good success with FF.  

 

I have only had two items lost using FF and guess what, it was eBay shipping services that lost the items.


Thing is, it has nothing to do with the FF.  It's the buyer.


mam98031  •  Volunteer Community Member  •  Buyer/Seller since 1999
Message 84 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading


@carlmarxx wrote:

50% refund  deduction if  eligible   ,doesn't help  when a buyer   damages   merchandise  beyond  repairs ,to total   loss  to the trash can .   

 


It does help, as 50% is much better than 100%, it just doesn't fix the problem or make the seller whole.  But it is far better than losing 100%.


mam98031  •  Volunteer Community Member  •  Buyer/Seller since 1999
Message 85 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading


@robbie31415 wrote:

@carlmarxx wrote:

50% refund  deduction if  eligible   ,doesn't help  when a buyer   damages   merchandise  beyond  repairs ,to total   loss  to the trash can .   

 


How is that unique to FF?

 

What if someone from California damages your item beyond repair.

 

Are you trying to say people in California should get more protection?

 

If no, then you are making a completely separate argument where you think eBay needs to modify seller protections as a whole.

 

Probably better to create a new thread.


Bingo. There is absolutely NO higher risk in shipping to a freight forwarder than there is in shipping to a domestic customer. Anything a buyer using a freight forwarder can do, a domestic buyer can also do. Fake tracking scams, returning a rock, chargebacks, etc., domestic buyers can do all of those things too.

Message 86 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading

This is  going to vary with what items you sell and the price point. Everything we've shipped under 70$ to forwarders we have no issues with and we will continue to fulfill. Once we exclude these orders and look at different price points, the case rates are higher for forwarders and of those cases we have a much higher percentage performing some type of fraudulent return. The key difference to domestic is for FF, there's no recourse even by filing a police report with your local department. These proxy buyers don't have a presence in the US, and even if you had their info it would be outside the US jurisdiction. This is something we've used successfully used in the past to recover large amounts from domestic return fraud cases.

 

There are other categories that lead to cancellation such as trade compliance on specific products and in those cases, and unlike ebay, the US government will place the burden on the seller to make sure items aren't exported to embargoed countries. Good luck telling them "they can be an employee at the company" if you're investigated.

Message 87 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading


@hs_tech wrote:

This is  going to vary with what items you sell and the price point. Everything we've shipped under 70$ to forwarders we have no issues with and we will continue to fulfill. Once we exclude these orders and look at different price points, the case rates are higher for forwarders and of those cases we have a much higher percentage performing some type of fraudulent return. The key difference to domestic is for FF, there's no recourse even by filing a police report with your local department. These proxy buyers don't have a presence in the US, and even if you had their info it would be outside the US jurisdiction. This is something we've used successfully used in the past to recover large amounts from domestic return fraud cases.

 

There are other categories that lead to cancellation such as trade compliance on specific products and in those cases, and unlike ebay, the US government will place the burden on the seller to make sure items aren't exported to embargoed countries. Good luck telling them "they can be an employee at the company" if you're investigated.


@hs_tech 

 

Yes, sellers are or should be aware of this.  If the seller ships an item to another country, whatever they are shipping they are responsible to make sure it is OK to ship to that country.  All this is in the rules for sellers on Ebay too.

 

However, a seller shipping to a Freight Forwarders does not have to comply to such rules as it isn't the seller that is shipping their item to another country.  The FF is responsible for that.  Sellers are not responsible as they have nothing to do with the actual shipment of the product directly to the customer, wherever they may be.


mam98031  •  Volunteer Community Member  •  Buyer/Seller since 1999
Message 88 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading

It would be great if life was this simple, but it really gets more complicated than that. I would strongly encourage you to at least leave a disclaimer that this is your opinion and not something backed by trade/legal statutes. We trade in these products and have spoken to professionals at the major courier companies that have cautioned us otherwise. However, this is a special case that most sellers will not encounter nor need to consider.

Message 89 of 94
latest reply

Re: Current policy on MBG with Freight Forwarders is misleading

It's not an opinion.  If I sell something to Victoria in Texas, I hold no responsibility for that item if she ship it off to the UK where it is not allowed.

 

Sellers have no control over where a buyer might ship something or for a Reshipper.


mam98031  •  Volunteer Community Member  •  Buyer/Seller since 1999
Message 90 of 94
latest reply