07-09-2022 09:08 PM
Do you think sellers ever do this?
Run into a OOS situation.
Rather than take the OOS strike,
deliberately send the wrong item knowing it will end with a INAD.
Then have the buyer send the item back.
Seller will be out of shipping both ways but will avoid a OOS strike.
07-09-2022 09:28 PM
No, they just don't send anything, then refund immediately when the INR is filed. 😖
07-09-2022 09:36 PM
@inhawaii I'm sure some have ... now, lets talk about doing that in the case of a Ghost relisting that sells ... yep, it happens ... happened to me several times meaning a previously Sold it mysteriously gets relisted without the Seller's knowledge and then sells ... again.
Here are some things I did when this happened (yep, more then once but has not happened for quite some time)
-Message Buyer, explain what happened and ask if they will request a cancellation
-Ship replacement items with a note explaining what happened and if they were not satisfied with the replacement to file a return and would accept without question
Both of those approaches yielded positive results and ironically, those I sent the replacement items to kept them with thanks. Sellers should NOT be penalized for a situation they did not create.
Mr. L
07-09-2022 09:42 PM
@southern*sweet*tea wrote:No, they just don't send anything, then refund immediately when the INR is filed. 😖
You are a genius!
Not that I would ever do that. 😉
07-09-2022 09:45 PM
@mr_lincoln wrote:@inhawaii I'm sure some have ... now, lets talk about doing that in the case of a Ghost relisting that sells ... yep, it happens ... happened to me several times meaning a previously Sold it mysteriously gets relisted without the Seller's knowledge and then sells ... again.
Here are some things I did when this happened (yep, more then once but has not happened for quite some time)
-Message Buyer, explain what happened and ask if they will request a cancellation
-Ship replacement items with a note explaining what happened and if they were not satisfied with the replacement to file a return and would accept without question
Both of those approaches yielded positive results and ironically, those I sent the replacement items to kept them with thanks. Sellers should NOT be penalized for a situation they did not create.
Mr. L
I agree with you however, this was not a "ghost listing".
It was simply a seller screw up. 😉
07-09-2022 10:10 PM
@inhawaii wrote:Do you think sellers ever do this?
Run into a OOS situation.
Rather than take the OOS strike,
deliberately send the wrong item knowing it will end with a INAD.
Then have the buyer send the item back.
Seller will be out of shipping both ways but will avoid a OOS strike.
Well, a single OOS isn't going to really hurt. And it will fall off in 3 months.
Now a whole bunch of OOSs are indicative of sloppy inventory management and suggest a seller who shouldn't be here in the first place. And most likely won't be for long. It is reasonable to believe that eBay keeps track of INADs and INRs as well.
07-09-2022 10:19 PM
@richard1rst wrote:
@inhawaii wrote:Do you think sellers ever do this?
Run into a OOS situation.
Rather than take the OOS strike,
deliberately send the wrong item knowing it will end with a INAD.
Then have the buyer send the item back.
Seller will be out of shipping both ways but will avoid a OOS strike.
Well, a single OOS isn't going to really hurt. And it will fall off in 3 months.
Now a whole bunch of OOSs are indicative of sloppy inventory management and suggest a seller who shouldn't be here in the first place. And most likely won't be for long. It is reasonable to believe that eBay keeps track of INADs and INRs as well.
It's 12 months if you sell less than 400 items in a 3 month period.
07-10-2022 12:23 AM
I would venture to guess that 0.0001% of all sellers in the world would do wat you suggest.
07-10-2022 12:32 AM
Even though it isn't the most business ethical thing to do, I would imagine that it does happen across the platform. 😎
07-10-2022 05:20 AM
Are you serious?
07-10-2022 06:20 AM
No.
07-10-2022 06:20 AM
@coolections wrote:I would venture to guess that 0.0001% of all sellers in the world would do wat you suggest.
I might imagine that the number is far higher than that given the onerous consequences to making such a mistake for smaller sellers. EBay defines the rules of the system and it only makes sense to game those rules for business reasons. It is the American way and you are a fool not to play the game. I mean heck, Ebay never even apologies for their mistakes when it costs sellers lots of time correcting those errors.
Disclaimer: Over the past decade I can only recall two instances where I was unable to find a sold item to ship. And one was a double listing that should have been caught by Ebay.
07-10-2022 06:26 AM
There has been a time or two when I thought a "ghost" listing caused a problem. Maybe it does happen. I am sure those that think it happened know what they are talking about. I my case it was a matter of using sell similar and forgetting to change the quantity on the new listing.
Seller error.
Demerit or whatever it is called. Only so many allowed.
Radine
07-10-2022 07:29 AM
@inhawaii wrote:Do you think sellers ever do this?
Run into a OOS situation.
Rather than take the OOS strike,
deliberately send the wrong item knowing it will end with a INAD.
Then have the buyer send the item back.
Seller will be out of shipping both ways but will avoid a OOS strike.
Yes
07-10-2022 07:46 AM
I have contemplated that before but we are not supposed to be discussing how to trick a buyer
it woud be a bad suggestion to do so but thinking about a subject is not the same as doing it
I never thought about not sending the item won because that would give you an INR
I was recently faced with this same dilemma and just wet for the OOS
its not so bad actually. its the first time in many years since I have done this
my defect rate is now at 0.06 out of 1598 sales
I can take a bunch more I think before I woud lose my TRS but I dont plan on it