05-24-2025 08:35 PM - edited 05-24-2025 08:36 PM
Well I'm a buyer not a seller and hear alot of sellers having delivery problems and the associated headaches.
It goes both ways>>>
"eBay Customer Support has placed the case on hold until Jun 3, 2025 to allow time to provide additional documentation.
The seller provided tracking that shows the item is currently on its way to you. You should receive it soon.The seller provided tracking that shows the item is currently on its way to you. You should receive it soon."
I paid and ordered it on May 10th. Tracking origionally showed accepted on May 10th. I opened a INR case with "I still want item" (not refund) to wake the seller up on the 21st to the fact that the package was not moving. Apparently seller then actually sent it on the 21st according to revised tracking (same tracking number). I assume a tracking slip with more than one item was origionally scanned and the package wasn't included. I'll be patient and give it time but?
05-25-2025 02:21 PM
"But why? And how do you know the seller even used a Scan sheet? Many sellers don't use them. I know I don't."
It's just the only reason I could think of where "Accepted" and "Arrived" would show on tracking 11 days apart at the point of origion with the same tracking number. It only started showing movement after the second scan.
Oh well a moot point now that it is moving and past the Northern hub where most packages from East of here enter the state.. A head scratcher for me though.
05-25-2025 02:29 PM - edited 05-25-2025 02:41 PM
@roccotacodad54 wrote:Both Accepted and Arrived scans were both at the point of origin 11 days apart.
But most importantly (IMO), the Arrived scan was also the EXACT SAME DAY YOU FILED THE INR. Way too big a coincidence to be only that.
There's simply no way that's a "delay in transit" -it didn't even transit to anywhere, for those 11 days. If that p.o. was that far behind, for one thing it would mean they were that far behind on ALL their packages, so the whole zip code of residents would probably be rioting, lol. And for another, they wouldn't even do the 'Arrived' scan; they would just sling all those late packages forward, and let it look like they didn't have possession of them all that time ... let it look like they were delayed in transit.
"Arrived" sounds more like them making a point of showing "Hey it wasn't us, the item didn't even ARRIVE here until this date."
Now I do agree with Mam that 'Accepted' is not the usual first scan for items in a scan form manifest. It's usually 'Received, acceptance pending' or 'Picked up, acceptance pending.' So unless you were mistaken when you wrote what the first scan said, it sheds some doubt on the 'forgot to include that package' seller oopsie theory.
But I hope that one is actually right somehow, because if it's not, then it makes the 'damaged empty package' one more likely.
05-25-2025 03:31 PM
Actually tracking showed "Shipping label created" etc etc..
Then "Shipping label created at self service Kiosk" etc. etc..
Then "USPS" reciept of item for mailing" these on the 10th.
Then "Arrived at USPS Origin Facility" on the 21st.
So you are correct and I was mistaken about the accepted part. I guess I mistakenly typed/thought accepted instead of "reciept of item". In my mind at least they seem to mean the same thing.
Also...
05-25-2025 03:43 PM
@roccotacodad54 wrote:"But why? And how do you know the seller even used a Scan sheet? Many sellers don't use them. I know I don't."
It's just the only reason I could think of where "Accepted" and "Arrived" would show on tracking 11 days apart at the point of origion with the same tracking number. It only started showing movement after the second scan.
Oh well a moot point now that it is moving and past the Northern hub where most packages from East of here enter the state.. A head scratcher for me though.
I've seen it many times on a shipment that went astray, and as I said before, I don't use scan sheets. Sometimes USPS sends things the scenic route. Your seller likely didn't do a darn thing wrong.
05-25-2025 03:49 PM
Do you know the timing of both. Which happened first? Or is this yet another assumption in order to make this appear to be a seller issue and not USPS? IMHO the buyer filed the INR, the seller may have filed a Trace or otherwise contacted USPS to see what the heck was going on. The assumptions of the OP simply are not something that can even happen.
I've had packages sit in the same place per tracking for a couple of weeks and then suddenly start moving. There is a lot of energy going into trying to find the seller at fault with zero evidence that they did something wrong. I do find that quite odd.
As for the package being damaged, unless the tracking is telling the OP that the package has been damaged, this is yet another assumption on their part.
05-25-2025 03:52 PM
Since the seller used a Kiosk to create labels, I don't think a Scan Sheet would be involved at all.
Sounds like it was all USPS delays.
05-25-2025 05:39 PM - edited 05-25-2025 05:52 PM
I still cannot think of any reason the seller's local post office would wait 11 days to start moving the package and why it just so happened to be the same day you filed INR.
And I know you are not determined to "blame the seller" -I don't think any of us are itching to hate the person or whatever; if they did mess up it surely wasn't intentional. But I'll say it one more time: a good seller would have written something to you in response to the INR, even if only "I don't know what happened; I did ship the item on the 10th but it looks like they finally scanned it again today. Sorry about the delay." The fact that you can only guess is my beef with them. And if they were really good, they would have noticed the problem themselves, days before that.
But any time in the future when you make a post that is about shipping/tracking .... would you PLEASE just post a screenshot instead of going on memory? It took me about 2 minutes to go find an order and grab this one, whereas we have been thinking your initial scan said "Accepted" since last night. A self service kiosk is a whole other thing. And I don't know what you mean by "etc etc etc."
This is what an item shipped with a scan form looks like. By the way, note how "USPS Origin facility" and "USPS Regional origin facility" are two different locations (different zip codes).
05-25-2025 07:27 PM
@gurlcat wrote:
@roccotacodad54 wrote:Both Accepted and Arrived scans were both at the point of origin 11 days apart.
But most importantly (IMO), the Arrived scan was also the EXACT SAME DAY YOU FILED THE INR. Way too big a coincidence to be only that.
There's simply no way that's a "delay in transit" -it didn't even transit to anywhere, for those 11 days. If that p.o. was that far behind, for one thing it would mean they were that far behind on ALL their packages, so the whole zip code of residents would probably be rioting, lol. And for another, they wouldn't even do the 'Arrived' scan; they would just sling all those late packages forward, and let it look like they didn't have possession of them all that time ... let it look like they were delayed in transit.
"Arrived" sounds more like them making a point of showing "Hey it wasn't us, the item didn't even ARRIVE here until this date."
Now I do agree with Mam that 'Accepted' is not the usual first scan for items in a scan form manifest. It's usually 'Received, acceptance pending' or 'Picked up, acceptance pending.' So unless you were mistaken when you wrote what the first scan said, it sheds some doubt on the 'forgot to include that package' seller oopsie theory.
But I hope that one is actually right somehow, because if it's not, then it makes the 'damaged empty package' one more likely.
With all due respect, you are giving the USPS too much credit. Most of the works at USPS, in my experience with multiple post offices over the years, do not give a flip. My post office won't accept more than 10 packages at the counter without a scan sheet. On those days, I have to simply hope when they ship out to the distribution center they will get an "acceptance scan." It is about 60/40 with them getting the scan. For post offices more than ~50 miles from a regional sorting facility, packages almost always sit at least 24 hours as there is only one truck, instead of two, running now. Back in March, I literally had packages sitting for 3, 4, 5 days, even two weeks just at my local post office. To avoid having to use a scan sheet, I had a couple of times during that period where I dropped off 10 orders, got them scanned, then got back in the line to do the rest. If I didn't do that, then I would risk having multiple packages sit for days without an acceptance scan and since the items arrived beyond the estimated date, my account would have been dinged. Maybe your USPS experience has been different. If you ship from a post office in a large city, it probably has. For those of us in more rural areas, USPS has been a nightmare lately.
05-26-2025 12:52 AM
Well lets just let this post go to the graveyard of forum time Gurl.
Every very time I try to do a screenshot and attach itto a post on any forum my security software has a fit-not worth the trouble. As far as etc.etc.-just the rest of Ebay babble.
If I knew I was going to open this can of worms I wouldn't have posted in the first place.
TO EVERY SELLER, I'm sorry for my post. My mistake. For some reason this post has struck a painful nerve with some.
I'll certainly be more careful in the fiture..................Bye now................
05-26-2025 12:58 AM
Just so we are clear. This didn't strike a nerve with me. I just don't like buyers or sellers making assumptions about each other. It leads to unnecessary misunderstandings and potential hard feelings.
We have lots of misbehaving sellers and buyers on the site. Many stories have been shared in the community. It can be very frustrating for members. The only thing for me here on this thread was the assumptions made that had no reason to make those assumptions. That really is the only point I was trying to make and it clearly came across badly, which wasn't my intention.
I'm sorry that I made you feel the way you do about the thread. Again, not my intention.
06-12-2025 09:05 PM
@roccotacodad54 wrote:"But why? And how do you know the seller even used a Scan sheet? Many sellers don't use them. I know I don't."
It's just the only reason I could think of where "Accepted" and "Arrived" would show on tracking 11 days apart at the point of origion with the same tracking number. It only started showing movement after the second scan.
Oh well a moot point now that it is moving and past the Northern hub where most packages from East of here enter the state.. A head scratcher for me though.
When it comes to scan intelligence, USPS is not the model to look at. At my job, we ship 50+ packages a day via USPS. Most days - no problems. But every so often, and more often than we'd like, we get screwed up or missed scans. Like the day everything was scanned as delivered, to our address, as the packages were loaded into the truck. Or the time I packaged and sent 20-some orders of the exact same thing, all packaged exactly alike. Some got scanned, most did not. The scanned ones arrived on time. The others did not. We got lucky and our customers we willing to wait a bit. We then agreed to refund everyone if they would agree to either return the refund or return the order once it did arrive. Everyone felt that was fair and all but one buyer returned the refund (repaid via PayPal invoice thru eBay Messages).
I've been tracking shipments we do for other sellers (we act as the drop-ship firm) - same issues. And generally there are days, if not weeks, between the Acceptance scan (USPS physically had the order to scan the label) and then next scan, which is generally at the destination primary USPS sort facility, on it's way to the local PO for actual delivery. So over a span of 5-6 to as much as 20-30 days, the package apparently walked itself from one facility to another. NO SCANS indicating that they ever left town (normal is a scan in/scan out of each USPS facility)... they just suddenly appeared somewhere else.
USPS has rolled out a LOT of changes. New services, new equipment, new employees. One postmaster I talked with summed it up quite well: Too few employees, too many newbies. Mistakes get made and can sometimes take a bit to sort out.
That Acceptance scan you saw on the tracking -- that is a physical scan of the label on the package. It means USPS physically had your package. Some of the in/out scans at various facilities are not actually related to someone physically putting your package into a semi-trailer. More likely the package is in a cage along with dozens or hundreds of other packages, and the cage is scanned and all the packages get a tracking update.
Plus you cannot 'reuse' a shipping label. If USPS has scanned it Accepted, it will never be accepted at another facility on another package. Once Accepted, it will never be Accepted again. It would be returned to the From address or held at the PO for pickup - it does not move forward to the recipient.
My experience says this was nothing more than a unfortunately too common USPS mis-handling that created a very large gap between scans. I had an INR just this morning that did the same thing - the buyer opened the INR yesterday as it had been 3 weeks since Acceptance. By the time I got in this morning and processed the INR, the package was Out For Delivery and then Delivered later in the afternoon. The UPS just messed up and it fixed itself before I needed to do anything. I -did- respond to the INR - don't want to get a soft ding for not responding to a Case. But it was only to confirm the tracking number and then to confirm the package was Out For Delivery. Before I left work, eBay had confirmed delivery and if the buyer doesn't file any other complaint withing 24 hrs, the Case will be closed with no other action needed by the buyer or the seller.
Do anything long enough and it's amazing all the oddball things that will happen that other, more experienced workers will tell you happen now and then and it's no big deal. Annoying -- yes, very much so. But generally not fatal. Just annoying.
I'm sure I haven't yet 'seen it all'... I've only been selling online since the early 90's, before "The Internet" when all we had were BBS systems, dial up modems, and checks for payment. No consumer digital cameras yet either. I can't wait to see what kind of 'fun' we have the rest of the year, or next year, or next decade. Yee Haw Y'All!!
-Bob.