06-23-2021 08:25 AM
Hello
I just recently sold a computer part earlier this month through eBay. The payment was received but I noticed that the address was a freight forwarder in Delaware. The item was shipped and successfully delivered
However, two days ago the buyer filed a SNAD case claiming the box was empty. I went ahead and contacted the freight forwarder directly and they have responded back to me, confirming that this package was indeed forwarded to the buyer.
From my understanding, ebay's MBG is voided if they use a forwarder. However, I know it's typically hard to prove that a buyer used a forwarder. However, since I have written proof (plus pictures of the parcel from the company), do I have any ground to stand on? Furthermore, what should I do about the return?
06-23-2021 04:47 PM
I don't even understand how this 'empty box' claim ever holds any weight. It's utterly ridiculous.
First of all, which carrier would deliver a box that is empty, second, who would accept any empty box? I realize some of you will say "well if you don't accept the package you void your mbg immediately!", ok fine, but how many people actually know that??
And has anyone here ever received an empty box? Or known someone it really happened to? I feel like this is something that has never happened in the history of man kind.
06-23-2021 05:03 PM
I could not find anything on this before at all when my claim came up recently. I do bookmark these types of things to try and find them again on here.
I agree with you - the piece that brittanie pointed out is really critical to the overall process. It would be really helpful if this was incorporated into the process change when a freight-forwarder is involved.
Thanks for your attention to detail on this. I certainly appreciated having e-Bay support me on my recent situation and am certain other Sellers want that outcome also.
06-23-2021 06:52 PM
This is a CRITICAL Question you bring up. Is showing proof of Delivery to a Known Freight Forwarder with NAME and ADDRESS on the Orders Detail Page ENOUGH EVIDENCE, that the buyer is using a 3rd Party to reship? Brittanie stated WE SELLERS NEED TO PROVE THE FREIGHT FORWARDER has done their part and actually sent the package to the buyer?? That they Didn't STEAL IT? They didn't SWITCH THE ITEM? This does not seem right? Does it? How can we PROVE the Freight Forwarder has sent the package to it's final destination? This SHOULD NOT BE OUR RESPONSIBILITY.
06-23-2021 07:19 PM - edited 06-23-2021 07:21 PM
@ekmadonna wrote:This is a CRITICAL Question you bring up. Is showing proof of Delivery to a Known Freight Forwarder with NAME and ADDRESS on the Orders Detail Page ENOUGH EVIDENCE, that the buyer is using a 3rd Party to reship? Brittanie stated WE SELLERS NEED TO PROVE THE FREIGHT FORWARDER has done their part and actually sent the package to the buyer??
Another detail that occurred to me just now was that reshipper customers frequently (though not always) have their customer number embedded somewhere in their Ship To address, so that the reshipper knows whose package it is without having to open it. Any elements of the address that are clearly not either the addressee name or the street address would serve as another indicator of a package to be forwarded elsewhere.
brittanie@ebay : One other point besides the above regarding the forwarding question: When the buyer opens an INR and the seller uploads the tracking number for a package that is still en route, the dispute is closed automatically as soon as the system sees a Delivered scan. Shouldn't the dispute also close automatically if a Forwarded entry is seen in the tracking history?
I was dealing with just such an issue that was finally resolved today (send me a PM if you want the item or tracking numbers), in which the delay was caused by the buyer having a forwarding order on his address. The package ended up going clear across the country before he was able to cancel the order, at which point it came back across the country and was finally delivered to him today.
So that worked out okay, except that he filed an Item Not Received dispute several days ago, saying that he wasn't interested in waiting any more. I uploaded the tracking number, containing a clear "Forwarded" entry, and hoped that it would close out the dispute per eBay's MBG policy. It did not. Only the "Delivered" entry this afternoon got it closed.
I know there are a zillion ways for an MBG issue to get complicated, but some exclusions should be easier to enforce than those requiring human intervention. When the carrier states right there in the tracking report that an item was forwarded, then it should be reasonable to conclude that it was forwarded, and the system (i.e. whatever code is parsing the tracking info for the dispute) should be able to close the dispute on that basis.
06-23-2021 10:32 PM
I am accept LARG empty box with fedex ,but not from ebay seller. It was Homedepot ,why not from ebay?
06-24-2021 10:09 AM
@eleanor*rigby wrote:Thanks for your explanation,
" . . . if a seller accepts the return before contacting us to provide proof of forwarding, we can't overturn that decision."
Yeah but notice once again the absence of YES.
06-24-2021 11:24 AM
@a_c_green & @pikabo-icu - Since your questions are similar I'll answer it together.
Generally the only tracking information we'll have is that the package was delivered to the address the buyer provided and we aren't able to verify if it's a forwarder with our current tools. Also, at that point it's delivered to a US address (generally) and it's only when the item is then forwarded on to another address that the item is voided from protection. You'll notice the wording in the policy page says "The item was sent to another address after original delivery". We have to have proof of that second delivery to move forward and currently we don't have a way to automatically detect that (and may not ever be able to, because that shipment happens outside of our site). We don't generally see any 'forwarding' event in the tracking in these types of situations.
I can ask for a possible update to the help page, but I can't promise that it will be updated, as that team ultimately has the final say on what's on the help pages.
Proof from the forwarder that the item was shipped somewhere else after initial delivery, does work as proof in this situation.
06-24-2021 11:27 AM
Thank you that made it at least a little more clear..
At least we don't have to have the buyer admit to using a forwarder..
CHEERS
06-24-2021 11:29 AM
@eleanor*rigby You are welcome! That is usually what causes issues (if the return is accepted by the seller and then the seller wants to appeal their approval). The way eBay looks at a seller approval, is that they reviewed the case details and determined that was the best option and we won't then overturn that decision (since doing so causes confusion for everyone) in most situations.
06-24-2021 12:19 PM
Appreciate the clarification, however, not every freight-forwarder may work to give you documentation that the item was indeed forwarded and the date.
E-Bay can tell from the address, the same as a Seller can, that the address/entity being shipped to is indeed a freight-forwarder mail service and the Buyer is registered outside the US.
Having this set up this way is a potential recipe for disaster for any Seller, as the freight-forwarder has a contractual arrangement with the Buyer and no obligation to any of us as a Seller.
E-Bay needs to close this loop hole for Seller exposure.
06-24-2021 12:49 PM
That is usually what causes issues (if the return is accepted by the seller and then the seller wants to appeal their approval). The way eBay looks at a seller approval....
brittanie@ebay
Thank you for the post. There is another issue that seems to be involved here. That would be that the SELLER has a timeline with regards to responding to the case. They do not want to risk having eBay simply "step in" and allow the buyer to get a full refund due to not responding in time.
Does ebay routinely offer an "extension" timewise for situations such as this where it may require additional time? Can a regular CS do this, or is the automated process going to continue as the clock ticks down?
What happens to a seller who simply refuses to ship expensive items to those known Delaware addresses and uses the "cancel due to problem address" feature?
06-24-2021 03:38 PM
"And has anyone here ever received an empty box? Or known someone it really happened to? I feel like this is something that has never happened in the history of man kind."
I sent my MIL a cup and saucer for Mother's Day a few years ago...the saucer made it but the cup was gone and the package had the PO's 'tampered' statement on it. So only half empty but it does happen.
06-24-2021 04:00 PM
@ittybitnot wrote:
That is usually what causes issues (if the return is accepted by the seller and then the seller wants to appeal their approval). The way eBay looks at a seller approval....
brittanie@ebay
Thank you for the post. There is another issue that seems to be involved here. That would be that the SELLER has a timeline with regards to responding to the case. They do not want to risk having eBay simply "step in" and allow the buyer to get a full refund due to not responding in time.
Does ebay routinely offer an "extension" timewise for situations such as this where it may require additional time? Can a regular CS do this, or is the automated process going to continue as the clock ticks down?
What happens to a seller who simply refuses to ship expensive items to those known Delaware addresses and uses the "cancel due to problem address" feature?
@ittybitnot You are welcome!
I do understand sellers have 3 business days to address a return request, that is why they should contact us immediately if they have evidence the buyer should not be covered under eBay Money Back Guarantee, so we can take the appropriate steps on our side. Generally this isn't a situation we'd put the case on hold for, if there's evidence the buyer is not covered we can close the case in the seller's favor when they contact us.
Sellers who cancel transactions may see it impact their selling performance metrics. Defects are not removable in situations where the seller wants to back out due to the location of the buyer's address and they should not use "Issue with buyer's address" to circumvent this, as this would be considered abuse of the cancellation process.
06-24-2021 04:03 PM
@pikabo-icu - I am glad! Honestly, in the years when I worked claims, you usually find out the buyer forwarded the item because they immediately say something in the return about it. Cheers!
06-24-2021 04:06 PM
Sellers who cancel transactions may see it impact their selling performance metrics. Defects are not removable in situations where the seller wants to back out due to the location of the buyer's address and they should not use "Issue with buyer's address" to circumvent this, as this would be considered abuse of the cancellation process.
Do not even know what to say. With all the known issues and fraud surrounding several addys in Delaware, etc. -