05-19-2025 01:47 PM - edited 05-19-2025 01:51 PM
TL;DR: When buyers are added to a seller's Blocked Buyer List (BBL), messages from that buyer are blocked and the seller has zero control. Pain point since Summer 2023 when eBay made an unannounced change that is still catching buyers and sellers in bad situations.
Straight off the bat, to those who think the setting under Buyer Rules on the Buyer Management page can control this: you are wrong. The setting that says, "Don't allow blocked buyers to contact me," applies exclusively to Buyer Requirement settings (e.g., unpaid items, primary shipping address, number of items purchased in 10 days). It has zero impact on whether a member on your Blocked Buyer List can contact you.
All messages from members on your BBL are blocked. Full stop. Note the bold text on the BBL page:
----------
HISTORY:
eBay said June 28 2023 the BBL / message block settings were not changing. Read posts #7-10 here:
Seller: If you block from your buyer requirements page (blocked buyer list), will the same stricter message block apply or does that only happen if you block through the link in M2M messaging?
eBay: To ensure this message block applies, you will want to report through the message only, as the buyer requirements page will function the same.
Fast forward to Sept 3 2023 and everything changed. Unannounced! Causing problems for buyers and sellers.
We first discovered the unannounced change when a seller came to Community with a problem here:
kyle@ebay said at the time, "This was changed due to overwhelming feedback over the years that blocking a buyer and then needing an extra step to block their messages was redundant."
eBay took control away from professional sellers because of some whiners that can't deal with customers in a business where customer service is paramount and dealing with difficult people comes with the territory.
Those sellers were too upset they had to check a separate box to block messages (a one time setting adjustment) after adding buyers to their BBL.
While I do admit it's nice to not see so many sellers complaining about buyers being able to message after they were blocked, eBay handled this change in the worst way by taking the choice out of sellers' hands. What eBay could/should have done was change the default message block setting with 2 weeks notice for sellers to 'opt out' of a forced message block on their account, similar to what they did when they forced passing on shipping discounts last year.
PRESENT DAY (what we've been fighting for, for nearly two years!, thanks for sticking with us kyle@ebay ) :
At this stage, factoring in changes already made, I think eBay should keep the BBL message block separate from the buyer requirements message block by adding a new setting.
Add a check box on the actual BBL page above the BBL list to block communications with people on the BBL, checked by default, but with the option to uncheck.
That way sellers wanting to block comms from BBL but wanting to allow comms from, say, purchased too many items in 10 days, the seller can do that. The setting is checked by default for those who think it's redundant, but can be unchecked by sellers that value their customer service opportunities and want to allow communication.
Of course you'll get some sellers saying it's redundant to have to uncheck a message block setting in 2 places. Seriously, you can't please everyone, but the current process where choice was removed from sellers entirely is definitely not working for sellers or buyers.
Some will make the argument allowing comms from BBLers with a current transaction is the way to go. While that would be better than what we have now, it would also bring back the initial problem the whiners were whining about: for them, blocked is blocked and they don't want messages despite a current transaction.
Which means eBay should make the change, get this right, and only have to do it once:
Messages from BBLers entirely on or entirely off, in the seller's control.
The only acceptable variation would be an additional layer of control: let sellers pick if they want to allow BBL messages for recent transactions only while blocking the rest, but make sure sellers retain the option to allow all or block all even if the 'recent transaction' option is offered. I don't think the extra layer is necessary, but it wouldn't hurt anything, and some sellers may want that option.
Important: There should be a notification on the buyer's side to let them know their message cannot be sent due to the block. Too many problems are resulting from buyers thinking sellers are receiving their messages and ignoring them resulting in negative feedback and worse. eBay notifies buyers they can't make a purchase when they are blocked, and eBay notifies buyers they can't message a seller when the seller's settings block messages due to buyer requirements, so why can't the same be done when a buyer is blocked by the BBL? Back when the buyer requirements block used to control whether BBL-ers could send a message, buyers were notified if they were blocked from sending a message.
IN PRACTICE:
What happens when Buyer is on Seller's Blocked Buyer List and messages are sent?
PRESS:
Ecommercebytes - Buyers 'Ghosting' Sellers May be eBay's Fault
Value Added Resource - eBay Changes Blocked Buyer List Messaging
Edit: typo
06-11-2025 10:47 PM
kyle@ebay wrote:
@wastingtime101 wrote:Hi kyle@ebay . Another use case where the buyer thinks the seller is ignoring their messages.
Hey @wastingtime101 thanks for your diligence in providing these examples! We'll continue to pass these along for review.
It was just pointed out that buyer is now using feedback to try and get through to the seller because they think the seller is ignoring their messages kyle@ebay . Not what we want to see happen.
06-12-2025 02:09 AM
This thread really breaks it down — appreciate the clarity! I’ve dealt with similar issues while managing client accounts in a facility management masters training context. When communication breaks down without warning like this, it leads to serious confusion on both ends. Giving sellers the option to manage BBL message settings makes way more sense than enforcing a blanket rule. Choice is key, especially in any professional environment.
07-02-2025 06:21 PM
@wastingtime101 , thanks for advocating for us on this important issue.
I sure wish eBay would listen to sellers on this.
I'm dealing with a buyer that I would like to block from future purchases, but still remain in touch to provide prompt and excellent customer service regarding the past purchase.
Is there any hope on the horizon?
08-20-2025 03:41 PM
Hi kyle@ebay . Prime example of a buyer the seller would want to block immediately, but the transaction is still ongoing so the seller would want to keep receiving messages for a myriad of reasons from being alerted if it escalates, to potential feedback extortion after delivery or partial refund fishing or other reportable offenses to help them if the buyer becomes more abusive.
09-19-2025 02:16 PM
More use cases kyle@ebay :
1. From @iamalwaysright , posted here:
Problematic buyer leaving neg FB because an item did not fit, with stated intent to purchase more.
That reminds me I wanted to update this thread with a similar experience.
2. Recently a buyer messaged me after receiving their purchase, not happy with a design feature of the item, trying to claim it was defective. The buyer kept insisting the product was available without that design feature (it isn't) and if they just bought a different color it would magically be without that design feature (it wouldn't).
They were also aiming to file an abusive SNAD for something called out as a design feature in both written listing description and photos. I knew they wanted to purchase the same item (only to be disappointed again) but also had to keep communications open to try and work the situation and avoid an abusive SNAD claim on an as-described item.
Really frustrating I could not block that buyer from making another purchase while keeping communications open. I hate that eBay forces sellers into this situation. We have so little seller protection as it is.
09-19-2025 02:23 PM
You know I totally agree with returning control of this back to the sellers, but regarding your own current situation, wouldn't you continue to see that buyer's messages even as a blocked buyer, because you have a current transaction with them? Or does the item's delivery end what eBay considers a current transaction?
09-19-2025 02:25 PM
09-19-2025 02:53 PM
Inexplicable that eBay hasn't seen fit to fix this issue.
Thanks for staying on top of it.
09-20-2025 03:32 PM - edited 09-20-2025 03:32 PM
@gurlcat wrote:You know I totally agree with returning control of this back to the sellers, but regarding your own current situation, wouldn't you continue to see that buyer's messages even as a blocked buyer, because you have a current transaction with them? Or does the item's delivery end what eBay considers a current transaction?
Having a current transaction does not affect message visibility when blocked anymore, and hasn’t since the current system was put into place as far as I know.
09-20-2025 04:05 PM
@jonathanbrightlight wrote:
@gurlcat wrote:You know I totally agree with returning control of this back to the sellers, but regarding your own current situation, wouldn't you continue to see that buyer's messages even as a blocked buyer, because you have a current transaction with them? Or does the item's delivery end what eBay considers a current transaction?
Having a current transaction does not affect message visibility when blocked anymore, and hasn’t since the current system was put into place as far as I know.
I think I just remembered why I was thinking that. -Blocked buyers can still reach the seller only IF they have a return or INR underway. -Their private messages would be blocked like any other BBL dwellers (😆) but they can write messages through the Details page and those show up no matter what. I believe both parties can write there, maybe even repeatedly, and the messages become permanent records that can serve as sort of "court testimony" to be considered by eBay.
09-21-2025 12:04 AM
Yea and I was just thinking technically they can also PM us here in the boards too if they wanted to and it'd go thru.
So my new solution to this is to tell the problematic buyer to move the convo on over to the ebay forums and private message me there, then BBL them in ebay. Ha haha. And in the meanwhile they'll be able to see all the posts I wrote complaining about them. Oh wait, I forgot this was a posting ID. I'm covered then, foolproof solution 😀
09-21-2025 09:15 AM
Hmmmm..... I would rather eBay just correct the stupid mistake they made on this, but I could see your idea being a workable workaround, lol. You could say the platform messaging has been acting glitchy, like delaying messages from going through or whatever, and provide an easy link here since most buyers probably have no idea this place exists.
On the other hand, if they're a real stinker and really p.o.'d about whatever's going on with the transaction, you might just be inviting a rabid raccoon to the yard, and if you don't use a posting i.d. (like I don't), they could make it their mission to stir up all kinds of drama about you, among your friends. Then what if they invited their friends? Ugh.
Incidentally, have you ever seen any real-time buyer/seller squabbles here? I've seen only one, and it was bleepin' awesome. 🤣 More to the point, it was a real eye opener about whether to accept one side of a story just because you're seeing only one. What the OP described was a pretty messed up situation, with no obvious plot holes .... then somehow within a day or two, the other member found out about the post, came here and shed a wholllllle other light on what was going on, with screenshots and all. Obviously the OP vanished at that point, ha.
10-29-2025 06:26 AM
Hey kyle@ebay ! Hopefully you'll see this when you return from your break. A few more use cases for you.
1. From the perspective of a buyer that made a purchase with their seller account. Their purchase was not as described, the seller is freaking out, and the buyer wants to block them from making a retaliatory purchase without cutting off messages with the seller. (This is since closed out with a refund to the buyer, but @toomuchstuffagain35 wanted to block while the return was still active.
2. If ever there were a buyer a seller would want to immediately block from making future purchases, but keep communications open so they could use the messages to support reporting abusive buyer behavior and evidence for potential eBay claims or payment disputes, not to mention it's good CS to keep comms open and respond to buyer messages, it's this "top tier" gem that found their way to @iamalwaysright 's listings. 😬
https://community.ebay.com/t5/Selling/Top-Tier-Customer/m-p/35326030#M2627757
10-29-2025 06:33 AM
@wastingtime101 wrote:Hey kyle@ebay ! Hopefully you'll see this when you return from your break. A few more use cases for you.
1. From the perspective of a buyer that made a purchase with their seller account. Their purchase was not as described, the seller is freaking out, and the buyer wants to block them from making a retaliatory purchase without cutting off messages with the seller. (This is since closed out with a refund to the buyer, but @toomuchstuffagain35 wanted to block while the return was still active.
2. If ever there were a buyer a seller would want to immediately block from making future purchases, but keep communications open so they could use the messages to support reporting abusive buyer behavior and evidence for potential eBay claims or payment disputes, not to mention it's good CS to keep comms open and respond to buyer messages, it's this "top tier" gem that found their way to @iamalwaysright 's listings. 😬
https://community.ebay.com/t5/Selling/Top-Tier-Customer/m-p/35326030#M2627757
You do notice that @Kyle@eBay never answers?
10-29-2025 06:35 AM
He usually gives a thumbs up @Anonymous indicating he's seen the post and has passed the use case on to the product team.