03-13-2019 11:12 AM - edited 03-13-2019 11:12 AM
Hi everyone! We hope to see you here today at 1 PM PT for our Weekly Chat with the Community Team. Bring your general buying and selling questions for discussion
See you soon!
Alan - eBay Community Manager
If a member's response helped, please give it a Helpful. If you are the author of a thread and a member's response resolved your question, please click "Accept as Solution." More on Accepted Solutions.
Check out the eBay for Business podcast! For your chance to be featured on the show, call in with a question at 888 723-4630!
03-13-2019 01:08 PM
03-13-2019 01:08 PM
03-13-2019 01:09 PM
03-13-2019 01:10 PM
Concerning Selling Manager and Selling Manager Pro
When Seller Hub was coming in were we not told that these would go away as well as TL?
What is the situation with these?
03-13-2019 01:10 PM
We are now in Mid-March.
Do you have a specific date on when the Forced GTC change will take place?
03-13-2019 01:11 PM
03-13-2019 01:12 PM
Hi, what is the actual date when we will no longer be able to access the shorter duration listing cycles and ALL listings get changed to GTC sitewide? Also, will our current active listings AUTOMATICALLY change over or will they ACTUALLY END first so we can make any necessary changes to a listing before it gets the GTC designation upon a relist or sell similar? Thanks
03-13-2019 01:12 PM
@mam98031 wrote:
I’d like to make a couple suggestions for whatever team or department handles the rules that guide Feedback.
First I think it would be a good idea not to have buyer FB any longer. Many sites have moved to this type of policy. No FB for buyers. Rating our customers is just not a good business practice IMHO. By removing Buyer FB then sellers can focus more on taking good care of their customers and provide the level of service that they have the right to expect.
I think once the buyers got use to it, that it would lead to a healthier environment and alleviate some stress buyer’s feel when they don’t get FB when they expect it or for sellers is wondering why they can’t say anything negative about their buyer.
I know that some buyers really enjoy collecting FB. It is important to them. But I do think that my not having buyer FB buyers will learn to accept it and be OK with it. I just think this would be a very positive move for everyone.
The other thing is about FB removal. The legit reasons why a member may be able to get FB removed. While we do have a policy page for this, it is incomplete. There are other policy pages that contain additional information on the subject and I think it would be much easier for everyone if the full explanation and list of reasons would be better all on one policy.
Certainly other policies could reference each other. But when you are trying to research the valid reasons, it just seems so much easier if the policy page didn’t make you go here there and everywhere to gather the info you are seeking.
There may be more, but these are the policies I’ve found that have stuff referenced regarding reasons why FB can be removed. But no one link has everything.
https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/feedback-policies/feedback-manipulation-policy?id=4231
https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/feedback-policies/feedback-extortion-policy?id=4230
https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/feedback-policies/feedback-seller-terms-conditions?id=4229
https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/member-behaviour-policies/membertomember-contact-policy?id=4262
Hi @mam98031, you bring up some good points and I'm happy to get these suggestions to the right teams. Thanks!
03-13-2019 01:13 PM
brian@ebay wrote:
@mam98031 wrote:I’d like to make a couple suggestions for whatever team or department handles the rules that guide Feedback.
First I think it would be a good idea not to have buyer FB any longer. Many sites have moved to this type of policy. No FB for buyers. Rating our customers is just not a good business practice IMHO. By removing Buyer FB then sellers can focus more on taking good care of their customers and provide the level of service that they have the right to expect.
I think once the buyers got use to it, that it would lead to a healthier environment and alleviate some stress buyer’s feel when they don’t get FB when they expect it or for sellers is wondering why they can’t say anything negative about their buyer.
I know that some buyers really enjoy collecting FB. It is important to them. But I do think that my not having buyer FB buyers will learn to accept it and be OK with it. I just think this would be a very positive move for everyone.
The other thing is about FB removal. The legit reasons why a member may be able to get FB removed. While we do have a policy page for this, it is incomplete. There are other policy pages that contain additional information on the subject and I think it would be much easier for everyone if the full explanation and list of reasons would be better all on one policy.
Certainly other policies could reference each other. But when you are trying to research the valid reasons, it just seems so much easier if the policy page didn’t make you go here there and everywhere to gather the info you are seeking.
There may be more, but these are the policies I’ve found that have stuff referenced regarding reasons why FB can be removed. But no one link has everything.
https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/feedback-policies/feedback-manipulation-policy?id=4231
https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/feedback-policies/feedback-extortion-policy?id=4230
https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/feedback-policies/feedback-seller-terms-conditions?id=4229
https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/member-behaviour-policies/membertomember-contact-policy?id=4262
Hi @mam98031, you bring up some good points and I'm happy to get these suggestions to the right teams. Thanks!
Thank you Brian.
03-13-2019 01:15 PM
@my-cottage-books-and-antiques wrote:
Last year at eBay Open Mohan Patt promised sellers that by 2019 (I think he said Q1, which is coming to an end in a few weeks), sellers with employees would have the ability to provide employees with limited access to the sellers account, so that the employees could do more without actually being privy to all the account info. This was greeted with much applause by sellers, many of whom had been asking for this tool for years. Since then, I'm hearing....nothing. Is this still in the works? For Q1? For Q2? Or...what?
Hi @my-cottage-books-and-antiques - I remember that, it was a really exciting announcement!
I also have not heard any updates on this as a roll-out, though I'm hopeful that we'll see this as a feature in the future.
03-13-2019 01:16 PM
tyler@ebay wrote:Hi @mg152 - hoping your fur baby heals quickly! Spoil her a bit for sure. 🙂
I will try but they are already pretty spoiled. I’ll give you an example, for dinner the dogs had homemade dog food I made them with ground chicken, turkey, rice and various veggies. Hubby had frozen pizza he cooked himself. Lol!!
03-13-2019 01:17 PM
Ecommercebytes has written up several detailed articles concerning the Early Spring Update. They have gathered a lot of feedback from eBay sellers, much of it critical about the forced change of Fixed Price listings to GTC only durations. An overwhelming number of sellers are not happy with this change, both reflected by Ecommercebytes non-biased reporting... and on the eBay forums themselves.
Based on all the feedback, will you consider re-evaluating this change and allow sellers to keep shorter fixed price durations?
03-13-2019 01:18 PM
eBay has told us that some time in the near future Paypal will be added into the approved managed payments options for buyers to use.
Are all sellers payment processing fees going to be the same regardless which payment option a buyer chooses, albeit Adyen, paypal, apple pay or any others that eBay might approve?
If not could you explain in simply terms why it might be different?
I would also like to request at this time that the managed payments team schedule a chance to participate in this weekly chat again very soon as there is a lot of talk about the coming changes.
Good Luck Selling!
03-13-2019 01:19 PM
tyler@ebay Sorry Tyler, I thanked you as "Trinton"on the first reply ... ooooooops!
03-13-2019 01:20 PM
@my-cottage-books-and-antiques wrote:
Ebay has said that improving sales velocity is an important part of their 2019 plans. For many of us, especially sellers of one-offs, social media is a key part of our own sales velocity strategy. Yet eBay provides woefully little in this regard. There's been no change to the four (largely unnoticed) links at the upper right of listing pages: email, Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest. As ebay moves everyone to GTC, the value of these sites increases. Perhaps ebay could do more with these? And why on earth, in 2019, is Instagram not one of the links? And speaking of social media, many of us see value in it, but I'm sure more sellers would use it if ebay provided some incentives: maybe an FVF discount for items bought when clearly referred by Social media? Or maybe some contests for referrals? At least some thing....
Hi @my-cottage-books-and-antiques - this is a great call out! There are a few different initiatives to incentivize sharing items on social media, and it's something that we're working on developing more broadly.
When it comes to an Instagram share, I think that would be a valuable addition too. I'll get it suggested. Thanks!