04-23-2020 07:57 AM
04-24-2020 02:49 PM
Wait. It’s only 1.) 3 days overdue and 2.) seller hasn’t responded back?
I’d be on alert myself but this isn’t a huge time frame in the middle of a pandemic and people’s personal challenges. I’m talking about seller response here, not a properly filed INR.
At what point did you get the Ebay message in this timeline?
04-24-2020 02:52 PM
Um, no it isn’t.
There’s no limit to the number of IDs a single member can have, and many sellers use posting IDs to protect their business from mischief by someone who didn’t like a post.
The only violation is creating IDs to get around any type of Ebay disciplinary action.
04-24-2020 03:05 PM
Actually the FCC is in charge which is the Federal Government. Neither the phone company or FCC makes money from sales generated over phone lines. You aren’t comparing like entities.
04-24-2020 03:07 PM
Blaming the buyer again.
04-24-2020 03:18 PM
@jenandrews02 wrote:Actually the FCC is in charge which is the Federal Government. Neither the phone company or FCC makes money from sales generated over phone lines. You aren’t comparing like entities.
Then why did I choose and pay a particular phone company to have a phone line with ?
I'll agree this comparison isn't a great one but I am pretty sure phone companies aren't working for free.
04-24-2020 03:27 PM
@jenandrews02 wrote:Actually the FCC is in charge which is the Federal Government. Neither the phone company or FCC makes money from sales generated over phone lines. You aren’t comparing like entities.
So you're saying that the phone company isn't making anything off the use of their equipment and that the Federal Government is the one that makes the money. Interesting! I wonder why the phone company has employees to maintain the equipment then. Maybe those are government employees and any phone bill is merely a tax. Hummm!
04-24-2020 03:30 PM
The comparison doesn’t work. We could dig deeper into the debate but there aren’t enough similarities in the business models to make it reasonable.
04-24-2020 04:36 PM
Disruption - sowing discord, fanning flames by posting as multiple people
Avoid detection - pretending to be someone else, trying to circumvent an EBay punishment
Posting IDs have been around since the very beginning are are totally allowed.
Ask a board moderator:
@Anonymous
04-24-2020 04:42 PM
Im not accusing her of axe murder, I’m explaining that a properly filed complaint sets off an immediate series of events.
If nothing is truly happening, she should double check her efforts.
04-24-2020 04:59 PM
@jenandrews02 wrote:The comparison doesn’t work. We could dig deeper into the debate but there aren’t enough similarities in the business models to make it reasonable.
Basically you are saying that eBay should be held responsible for unscrupulous sellers engaged in criminal activity on eBay's platform although it is against eBay policy and UA for them to do so. My point is that the same should apply to the telephone company when criminals use that company's services to engage in criminal activity even though it is against the phone company's policy to do so. I'm not seeing how one company would be at fault and the other wouldn't.
04-24-2020 05:34 PM
The government is holding the providers responsible and are taking legal action.
So the federal government should fo the same for eBay if all things are equal, right?
04-25-2020 01:24 AM
I didn't read this whole thread but the same thing happened to me twice. Unfortunately i just had to "wait it out" but did get my money back.
File a "item not received" case. You'll have to wait X amount of days.
After another X amount of days ebay will step in.
If the seller does not respond and can't prove delivery, you will win the case and be refunded.
Hang in there. Good luck and stay safe!
04-25-2020 01:33 AM
@jenandrews02 wrote:The government is holding the providers responsible and are taking legal action.
So the federal government should fo the same for eBay if all things are equal, right?
The problem is that the criminal element's adaption to the use of modern technology has out distanced the phone company's ability to block them. Many legitimate companies and even the VA and other government agencies use robo calls to confirm appointments and other things. Even blocking technology doesn't appear to work.
In addition, criminals are able to imitate legitimate numbers and those no longer in service. There doesn't seem to be much that can be done by the phone company that can currently be done that they aren't trying. Just as eBay is trying fight the scam artists but it seems that they are, thus far, not making much headway.
Yes the federal authorities should treat both businesses the same. However, can they blame those businesses for being victims of criminals that they themselves seem to be unable stop. After all, look at the warnings that the Social Security Administration and IRS have posted about known scams related to their agencies, not to mention the many others. Frankly, warning consumers to be wary seems to be about the only thing that is even slightly effective.
Alas! Criminals have taken to the information age with gusto.
04-25-2020 03:14 PM
Then there’s the solution everyone’s been asking for. The Federal Government should treat eBay like they do the phone VoIP companies. Prosecute them for enabling the scammers. Then maybe eBay will be more proactive in dealing with these issues. Perfect solution actually.
The problem with this board is the arrogance of the some of the posts telling buyers it’s their fault they got scammed. Or better yet, the unofficial lists and guides to not getting scammed. Also, there are those of you that think eBay doesn’t have the ability to do anything about it. They have the technology but won’t do anything because they are making money from all sales, even the fraudulent ones.
Signing off now. Back to spending my money and time places where I actually receive the items I’ve purchased.
04-25-2020 03:59 PM
@jenandrews02 wrote:Then there’s the solution everyone’s been asking for. The Federal Government should treat eBay like they do the phone VoIP companies. Prosecute them for enabling the scammers. Then maybe eBay will be more proactive in dealing with these issues. Perfect solution actually.
The problem with this board is the arrogance of the some of the posts telling buyers it’s their fault they got scammed. Or better yet, the unofficial lists and guides to not getting scammed. Also, there are those of you that think eBay doesn’t have the ability to do anything about it. They have the technology but won’t do anything because they are making money from all sales, even the fraudulent ones.
Signing off now. Back to spending my money and time places where I actually receive the items I’ve purchased.
People aren't saying it's the buyers fault they for scammed but we do give directions on how to be more careful to prevent it in the future and how to handle it when it happens.
There is technology that eBay has that can tell them a seller is going to ship from a different location before the seller even does it!? What technology is this. Seems scary for eBay to know what I'm going to do before I do it. In all seriousness I asked how eBay could stop it before a seller violated the policy and buyers were already taken by it you didn't provide any information on how eBay could prevent it. And I honestly don't know how they could either