09-20-2009 08:59 PM
03-16-2014 09:21 AM
I guess you never heard of feedback extortion? One out of 50 use it.
04-03-2014 03:23 PM
As as seller I leave positive feedback as soon as I recieve the payment. I am not going to hold the buyer's feedback hostage.
As a buyer, I leave feedback after I recieve the item. If item is as described, I leave positive feedback. If the item is not as described, I will contact the seller and try to resolve it. I never leave feedback first as a buyer. They can hold my feedback hostage I do not care as ebay ratings is not my life.
04-05-2014 03:31 AM
04-08-2014 08:19 AM
04-13-2014 05:00 PM
I understand the sentiment but it isn't practical. Things can happen enroute - what if the buyer isn't happy with the purchase, not through any fautl of the seller, but maybe it was damaged in shipment or the buyer experiences remorse over the purchase?
The point is, - there is a lot of contact that could happen in between shipment and final feedback. It is best to ensure the buyer is 100% satisfied before the transaction is concluded. Their feedback is the assurance of that satisfaction. Once all parties are happy and consider the transaction final, then the seller can leave feedback. It is the logical last step.
I do know there are policies about sellers holding the merchandise hostage until the buyer leaves feedback, or sending threatening notes (etc). But nothing against what YOU suggest - which is holding the seller hostage by withholding the feedback you owe them.
04-20-2014 11:10 AM
As a buyer, i've gotten to the point that I want to play the same game as the seller. "I'm not going to leave feedback until they do." I know this way no one will leave feed back, but if that is what happens, that is what happens.
I feel it is just rude for the seller hold back feedback until they receive feed back from the buyer.
The only way the 'seller is the last to leave feedback' makes any kind of logic at all is that if eBay is full of buyers that whine and complain about the item they purchased for no reason. If that is the case, this really is broken.
04-22-2014 02:10 PM
@buybyjo wrote:
A seller should leave positive feed back immediately upon receiving payment. Selers who wait are either hiding a false description or withholding positive feedback for extortion. Simple as that.
Have to disagree with you on this!
Many sellers wait to make sure that the item is delivered; the item is received in good condition; that the buyer is satisfied with the transaction; and that there are no problems that need to be resolved.
When buyers leave Positive Feedback, it signals to the seller that "All Is Well. Package Received in good comdition. No problems need to be resolved"
At this time most sellers will leave Positive Feedback (that is all that they can leave) if they have not already done so.
There are some sellers who, for convenience, set aside some time each month to leave Positive Feedback in large batches. (Sellers and buyers both have 60 days in which to leave feedback)
There are some sellers who choose not to leave any feedback at all
There are some buyers who choose not to leave any feedback at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As for your comment about sellers withholding feedback for extortion ----
That is impossible.
Sellers are only allowed to leave Positive Feedback; or they may choose to leave No Feedback at all.
On the other hand, AFTER PAYMENT HAS BEEN MADE, scamming buyers might try to extort extra items; unwarranted shipping discounts; or special handling. It is only after payment that a buyer might unjustly reverse the payment; file false claims of "Item Not Received" or "Significantly Not As Described". Should a seller be required to leave Positive Feedback for such a scammer. The only other choice is for the seller to leave No Feedback at all.
04-22-2014 02:35 PM
Something I forgot to mention -----
Buyers cannot be harmed by Feedback
Sellers can be harmed by Feedback
Buyers should use Messages to resolve any problems that arise.
Buyers should only Leave Positive Feedback AFTER the item has been received and there are no problems that need to be resolved.
05-07-2014 03:13 PM
Feedback. As a buyer I give Feedback when I get the item and see that it is O.K., not damaged, works, etc.
As a Seller, I check my tracking, wait for a Buyer to get the item then give them a few days to contact ME if there is anything they are unhappy about BEFORE I leave Feedback. I don't presume just because they got it o.k., they will be happy.
And not all Buyers want e-mails asking "are you happy with your item?" I am o.k, with that as a buyer but I saw one Feedback for another buyer that was kind of snarky and read "yes, I got the braceley, I'm wearing it now" or something to that effect.
So, I will usually be curled up with my lap top doing mass Feedbacks up to a week after I see that a buyer has received an item. I give them at least two days because, sometimes I have gotten busy and not opened a package of, say, nail polish for a day or two.
05-07-2014 03:28 PM
The problem was unscrupulous sellers who were leaving nasty feedback in retaliation for deserved neutral or negative feedback for poor service or items not received. For instance, I used to work as a Travel Nurse. I had a friend on a 6 month contract who was staying at the same (not cheap) extended stay that I was at as we were both working over 1,000 miles from home.
My friend placed an eBay order and the seller sent her a broken item (EdT, broken in envelope, no packing (ill packed), stank to high heaven, runed the rest of her order). She was a LONG time eBay buyer. She took photos, politely asked to have that item replaced or refunded and also another item that had been ruined by the leakage. The seller never even answered her.
My friend sent several e-mails and appealed to eBay. She got a refund through eBay. She had not even left feedback for the seller when she looged onto her account and saw this from the seller (Negative Feedback) "Look out for this Motel Dweller who will try to hold you up for free goods" (maybe not verbatim but close). She started crying, kept crying. She told me "I am not some homeless person in a weekly pay motel trying to scam someone for free goods. I am a working nurse trying to get a fair shake."
So, abusive sellers like that are the ones that made it bad for every seller and now sellers cannot leave neutral or negative feedback for buyers.
05-07-2014 11:39 PM
As a seller, I leave feedback once left for me. Haven't had a comp!laing.
Once feedback is left, I leave mine.
As a buyer, I leave feedback once item is received and I'm happy with it.
It will come to the day feedback just won't be given as people just don't want to. It is no it mandatory to leave it.
05-14-2014 05:53 PM
05-16-2014 04:01 AM
05-16-2014 08:32 AM
You seem to comparing eating out with buying online which is like chalk and cheese.
BUT
If you do take you analogy then when someone pays in a fast food or pub where items are paid for upfront, than the moment they pay they are amazing customers (they can do no wrong after that). What about the person who has paid for his drink (therefore an amazing customer) gets drunk, starts abusing the staff, smashes the front widow, has a fight with another customer etc. Is he still an amazing customer becaue he paid for his drink before he drank it? From what you've put he is.
In ebay this happens (ok not this but agressive, rude, dodgy, ignorant etc buyers). And the only thing we as sellers can actually put is "what an amazing buyer,top notch ". Please note I am not saying this about 99% of the buyers but the 1% who don't know what they're doing and usually end up blaming the seller (like my case above).
05-16-2014 03:29 PM
well i am leaveing ebay and not coming back to ebay,i got ripped off by a seller and ebay want help so yal ebay u suck