When does Israel give up her chemical weapons?

[john_wade]

Israel has had a chemical, biological and nuclear weapons program since at least the 1950s, and probably has something to do with the JFK assassination because he wanted to use the UN to shut down or at least stifle her program through inspections and UN troops. 

Since Jewish congressmen and the AIPAC lobby completely dominate "Capitol Hill", it's very doubtful that Pres. Obama is going to ask Israel to give up her chemical weapons which were used on civilians in Gaza several years ago. 

It's hypocritical to demand that all Arab states have no nuclear, chemical or biological weapons when Israel is just bristling with these weapons and eager to use them. 

What we don't want is an invasion of Israel by Russia and China because that puts these countries in direct conflict with the U.S. But Russian and Chinese warships and subs plying the Mediterranean means it's inevitable if this hypocritical double standard is not discarded. 

[91xv920rh]

Wow....calm down 91....From what I understand using White Phosphorus as a Pyrotechnic isn't a problem but the use of white phosphorus directly on the enemy is against the Chemical Weapons Convention Protocol.

And, lets see, we have WHO claiming it was used for the chemical effect?

The same folks repeatedly lobbing rockets into civilian communities... Right?

[91xv920rh]

Question asked because I don't know.  If you don't either just say so.

Lets see.... ONE country with limited resources and population versus HOW MANY unfriendly countries?

You KNOW the answer.  Your *ahem* special prejudices prevent you from accepting it.

[patrickh3342]

---

@91xv920rh wrote:

Question asked because I don't know.  If you don't either just say so.

Lets see.... ONE country with limited resources and population versus HOW MANY unfriendly countries?

You KNOW the answer.  Your *ahem* special prejudices prevent you from accepting it.

---

Oh so the use of chemical weapons is ok if you have limited resources and have enemies?

Is anybody who disagees with policies by the Israeli gov't have special prejudices?

Is Ron Paul prejudice?

How is wanting all Countries to get rid of their chemical weapons being prejudice or bias?

[91xv920rh]

---

Oh so the use of chemical weapons is ok if you have limited resources and have enemies?

Lets see... Defend form almost certain destruction?  

Decisions, decisions.

As a COUNTERBALANCE to the Assad regime? Definitly.

Is anybody who disagees with policies by the Israeli gov't have special prejudices?

Is Ron Paul prejudice?

How is wanting all Countries to get rid of their chemical weapons being prejudice or bias?

What are you babbling about?

DID I STATE DISARMAMENT WAS BAD?

[nan4848]

TYPHOID FEVER IN PAESTINE

• The Journal of Hygiene 
• Vol. 28, No. 3, Dec., 1928  

Ahhhhh..Haa....Haaa! Weak. Very weak.

They tried it again in Gaza against the Egyptian forces, but failed. The two Zionist infiltrators, who were sent on this mission, were captured by the Egyptians. The following cable was sent from the commander of the Egyptian Forces in Palestine to the General Headquarters in Cairo:

“15.20 hrs, 24 May [1948]. Our Intelligence forces captured two Jews, David Horeen and David Mizrahi, loitering around army positions. They were interrogated and confessed they had been sent by officer Moshe to poison the army [and the peoples’] water supply. They carried with them water bottles divided in the middle. The top part has potable water and the bottom part has a liquid contaminated with typhoid and dysentery, equipped with a rear opening from which the liquid can be released. They confessed they were members of the 20-strong team sent from Rehovot for the same purpose. Both have written their confession in Hebrew and signed it. We have taken the necessary medical precautions.”

In his book “War Diary” Ben Gurion confirmed the attack in an entry found on 27th of May 1948 where he stated: “[Chief of Staff Yigal Yadin] picked up a cable from Gaza saying they captured Jews carrying malaria gems and gave instructions not to drink water.” The Israeli author Yeruham Cohen wrote more about this cable in his book “In Daylight and Night Darkness”; Tel Aviv, 1969, pp66-68 (in Hebrew). The two Zionist agents; Horeen and Mizrahi, broke out of prison but were captured again and executed. http://www.globalresearch.ca/israels-history-of-chemical-weapons-use/5352003http://

[91xv920rh]

Geeee.........

Lookie who is back.

"Global Research" eh?

Weak... Very weak.

[mydog_typedthis]

Here's one for John:

http://rt.com/news/monsanto-march-berlin-protest-115/

[patrickh3342]

---

@91xv920rh wrote:

---

Oh so the use of chemical weapons is ok if you have limited resources and have enemies?

Lets see... Defend form almost certain destruction?  

Decisions, decisions.

As a COUNTERBALANCE to the Assad regime? Definitly. Well Asaad won't have chemical weapons and doesn't have Nukes and isn't worried about Israel based on other forms of advanced weaponry.

Is anybody who disagees with policies by the Israeli gov't have special prejudices?

Is Ron Paul prejudice?

How is wanting all Countries to get rid of their chemical weapons being prejudice or bias?

What are you babbling about?

DID I STATE DISARMAMENT WAS BAD? Yes according to you disarmament is bad if they have limited resources ( tee hee Israel with the largest Military Ally in the world and Nukes) and lots of enemies. Also the inability of being able to defend itself from certain destruction....lol.....Hyperbole much....and the only thing stopping this all from happening is a Pyrotechnic? snicker tee hee.

Any other nations that you agree should have chemical weapons?

---

[dkid2000]

Did this poster just post "tee hee" twice no less?

[nan4848]

Geeee.........

Lookie who is back.

"Global Research" eh?

Weak... Very weak.

That's all you got for an argument? The article is lies? Ben Gurion is lying? Or is it attack the messenger since you don't have an argument?

Geee.....guess I know who the button pusher is.

[justinc4285]

The fact that another country is even being accused of using chemical weapons is unacceptable.  If the globe goes into a war launching chemical weapons, chaos will ensue and countries will turn into a society without law.  Arab states have a different set of circumstances because of the strong presence of radical groups, netting more power than rebels of other countries in most cases. 

Radical groups can act unrationally, and that's why theirs a different set of rules.

[patrickh3342]

---

@dkid2000 wrote:

Did this poster just post "tee hee" twice no less?

---

WWhat not even a conspiracy theory of the Super Secret (tee hee)Cabal of Climate Scientists(tee hee) behind Israel's chemical stockpile? (tee hee)  bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha 

[dkid2000]

Poor patrick.

It is going to be tough for ANYONE to take the "tee hee" poster seriously about anything.

[patrickh3342]

Once you figure there is no Worldwide vast conspiracy of Super Secret Cabal of Lying and Manipulative Scientists(tee hee) you might understand what tee hee means.

[91xv920rh]

Oh so the use of chemical weapons is ok if you have limited resources and have enemies?

Lets see... Defend form almost certain destruction?  

Decisions, decisions.

As a COUNTERBALANCE to the Assad regime? Definitly. Well Asaad won't have chemical weapons and doesn't have Nukes and isn't worried about Israel based on other forms of advanced weaponry.

He has them NOW.  As in NOW.  And if you had a clue you would know he has one of the LARGEST stockpiles of Chemical Weapons in the world.

Is anybody who disagees with policies by the Israeli gov't have special prejudices?

Is Ron Paul prejudice?

How is wanting all Countries to get rid of their chemical weapons being prejudice or bias?

What are you babbling about?

DID I STATE DISARMAMENT WAS BAD? Yes according to you disarmament is bad if they have limited resources ( tee hee Israel with the largest Military Ally in the world and Nukes) and lots of enemies. Also the inability of being able to defend itself from certain destruction....lol.....Hyperbole much....and the only thing stopping this all from happening is a Pyrotechnic? snicker tee hee.

Someone is OBVIOUSLY ignorant of the FACT that the Isreali Army is but a small fraction of the combined forces arrayed around her.

Egypt is less friendly than it was, Syria in turmoil, Libya a wild card, Iran has both the missiles and soon a nuclear capacity...

The Yom Kippor War was an example of what COULD happen... And, if the Arab league response (and attacks) had been better coordinated israel could have lost.  But is takes someone with a little knowledge about history to know that.

Any other nations that you agree should have chemical weapons?

I think they ALL should be eliminated.  As well as Nukes.