cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

Based on my own research of calculating estimates on USPS, UPS and FedEx, it would cost at least $40 to send a 65L, 4lb. backpack. At that price + seller fees, I would lose so much of my earnings on the item it wouldn't be worth putting it up for sale. Surely there must be a cheaper option...

 

I've searched forums on eBay, outdoors sites and travel sites, and not found any helpful information on this. The majority address shipping for considerably smaller packs that do not have hard frames, and/or cover costs that were valid years ago. Some of those older posts claimed to have sent larger packs (exact size unknown) for $10-$15.

If anyone has experience with this, I'd really appreciate some advice.

Message 1 of 17
latest reply
16 REPLIES 16

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

No experience shipping large backpacks, but pretty good with all things shiply.

More info is required to toss around numbers.

Just length and approx weight don't do it. What are the EXACT packaged length, width, height, and weight, and what will it be packaged in (poly envelope, corrugated box)?

At 65in in length you would be skirting on the edges of oversize and other issues - that's why exact numbers are needed.
Message 2 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

Berserkerplanet, thank you for your response.

 

The backpack's dimensions are 26" x 14.5" x 6.5" when cinched and compacted as much as possible. It cannot be folded or smashed further because it has a rigid frame that could become misshapen if overly compressed.

 

The weight is 4lbs 4 oz. 65L refers to the backpack's capacity. This has no bearing on the shipping cost, but I put it down to give people an idea of overall bulk.

 

I had been hoping that USPS' flat rate board game box would work , but it's too small.

Message 3 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

>>The backpack's dimensions are 26" x 14.5" x 6.5"   The weight is 4lbs 4 oz

 

Keep in mind that 1/4" can make a huge difference, especially when items get largish, by pushing the shipped dimensions up to the next inch, which factor into Length+girth and dimensional weight calculations.  25 1/4" rounds down to 25" for calculations, but 25.5" rounds up to 26"

 

In other words, being precise is critical to not get a surprise on shipping costs (especially on a big item where that inch could broach a L+G threshold, and cause entry into oversize territory, balloon pricing, or ineligibility for use of that service)

 

 

The 4lb 4oz weight + box weight ships at 5-7lb, but I can tell you right now that dimensional weight is going to supersede that (actual weight becomes irrelevant and item ships at Dim Wt except for USPS Parcel Select.)

 

If you make a custom minimal required size box, it could end up being 26x15x7.

At 2.6 oz/sq-ft for heavyish weight corrugated:

  Box Wt = 2(26x15)+2(26x7)+3.3(15x7) * 2.6oz/sq-ft / 144in/sq-ft = 26.9oz = 1.68lb

 

Adding that to the 4lb4oz for the backpack and we get 5.93 lb = 6lb

 

(that is cutting it close, and if not careful, easily ends up shipping at 7lb. Remember, I calculated based on my cardboard sample, and some assumed minimal dimensions.)

 

 

USPS Dim Wt = 26x15x7 / 194 = 14.07lb  = 15lb    Length+Girth=26+(15+15+7+7) = 70in

 

The L+G is a non-issue as it is under the 108in max for PM, under the 84" threshold for Parcel Select balloon pricing, and FedEx Ground/Home Delivery only cares about Dim Wt and length maximums until L+G exceeds 130" or two sides > 30". FedEx Smartpost no issue with dimensions (under non-machinable criteria thresholds), but dim wt is a killer there.

 

 Based on a USPS billable weight of 15lb and commercial prices (eBay labels):

   Priority Mail would range from $13.15 to $47.57

 

For Parcel Select, the dimensions don't matter (L+G all good and Dim Wt not applicable), but the weight of the box has to be added to the actual weight. We came up with 6lb above.

    Parcel Select for 6# would range from $7.52 to $24.06

 

eBay FedEx Dim Wt = 26x15x7/166 = 16.45 = 17lb  which is what it would ship at.

   FedEx Home Delivery for that would range from $12.21  to $23.90

   FedEx  SmartPost       for that would range from $16.10  to $32.33

 

(the eBay calculators are coming up with the wrong Smartpost amounts again with them matching the FedEx Ground amounts, and I think still - for many months - using the wrong Dim Weight divisor. The Smartpost numbers above should be correct though as I fixed them by using dim weight as actual weight in the calculators.)

 

 

Looks like Parcel Select at $7.52 to $24.06 would be the reasonable, simple choice, even though it's a slow economy service (but about the same as the FedEx options timewise +/- a day or so)

 

For Parcel Select, even if the box is a couple of inches bigger, it would ship at 7lb and amounts change to $8.04 to $27.03 (basically size in this size range isn't much of an issue except for extra cardboard weight for a larger box thus potentially pushes it to the next pound)

 

You can futz with shipping costs here:    http://www.ebay.com/shp/Calculator

 

Message 4 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

It's all about the box, weight, distance & shipping method.

 

USPS uses dimensional weight for items over 1 cu foot (1,728 cu.in) travelling via Priority to Zones 5 and above.  If Zone 4 or under, DimWeight won't kick it.  DimWeight doesn't apply to Parcel Select/Retail Ground.

 

FedEx and UPS use dimensional weight for all packages.

 

Dimensional weight is LxWxH / divisor.  

 

The divisor for USPS is 194

The divisor for FedEx and UPS is 139 (If I recall correctly)

 

So if your box is 28 x 16 x 8, its 3,584 cu. in.

 

For USPS Priority Zones 1-4, it will ship by actual weight.

For USPS Priority Zones 5-9, it will ship with a Dim Weight of 19 lbs

For USPS Parcel Select/Retail Ground it will ship by actual weight regardless of zone.

 

For FedEx and UPS it will ship at the 26 lb rate

 

I say you use Calculated Shipping (not Fixed Rate) when you create the listing.  Put in all the correct dimensions (measurements and weight), choose large package and offer one expedited and one economy method (like USPS Priority & Ground) 

 

The buyers will make their own decisions if it's cost effective to purchase from you.  Your neighboring areas will have a decent rate.  Those west of the rockies will have a high rate.

Message 5 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

As you can see, Berserkerplanet is our reigning Sultan Of Shipping, Potentate of Postage, and Foremost Authority of FedEx, so read what (s)he says!

 

Also, for a large item such as what you are selling, none of the flat rate options are going to apply, so consider shipping using Calculated Shipping.

Message 6 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

>>Dimensional weight is LxWxH / divisor.
>>The divisor for USPS is 194
>>The divisor for FedEx and UPS is 139 (If I recall correctly)

 

(just clarifying and correcting the FedEx info)


USPS
USPS domestic Dimensional Weight Divisor (DWD) is 194 for domestic pkgs and applies only to PM Z5-8
USPS international shipments: not applicable (only Length+Girth considerations apply and vary by destination)


FedEx
DWD for FedEx is 166 through eBay labels or at FedEx.com through a linked eBay account for Ground Services.

Otherwise it's 139 for eBay FedEx Express Services, at FedEx.com online, for FedEx Retail (Counter) rates, or for International shipments (no idea about eBay FedEx international DWD - can't check)


UPS
DWD for UPS is 139 for daily rate (online rate) shipments, 139 for retail rate International shipments, and 166 for retail rate domestic shipments. (No idea if eBay UPS labels use different divisors due to negotiated contracts - no longer have a UPS account to check).

 


For the purposes of this discussion about the backpack, the eBay FedEx Ground/Home Delivery shipping option would be the one in consideration, the DWD is 166 for that, and your 28x16x8 example would ship at an eBay FedEx DW = 22lb

 

Message 7 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

>>As you can see, Berserkerplanet is our reigning Sultan Of Shipping,

>>Potentate of Postage, and Foremost Authority of FedEx

 

"More bowing, scraping, groveling, and shrubberies are required"

 

I just read the documents (FedEx and UPS service guides, USPS DMM, IMM, and other publications), research the web, and apply a couple of decades of shipping experience, and an engineering mindset to the issues.

 

There are areas where I have no clue - like insurance claims due to lack of any experience with them. Zero insurance claims either as a buyer or seller for probably over 8000 pkgs in and out, and I'm not a super overpacker - I cut all the corners (and flaps 🙂 I reasonably can to reduce shipping costs (lot of bubble mailers and custom boxes, but do go overboard on custom styrofoam corners and supports when I determine they are needed for a specific item to survive transport)

 

Mostly just lucky I guess.

 

 

>>what (s)he says!

 

Looks down. Rummages around. Where was I? Oh. He. Definitely he. (Guess my profile pic is too small to see)

 

 

>>consider shipping using Calculated Shipping

 

Totally agree. I never list anything flat rate except First Class, Media, PM Flat Rate that can be calculated. Don't like the imprecision and uncertainty about the bottom line for the sale (projected profits can plummet when east coast buyers purchase items with a flat shipping cost that was a middle of the range estimate), and it seems unfair to nearby buyers. That is a tradeoff against the simplicity from a buyer's standpoint of seeing either free shipping or a flat shipping cost. Then again, I've never had to deal with a buyer who purchased an item with a flat shipping cost on it, and complained that he was ripped off on shipping (because he was nearby and the flat cost was a higher average)

Message 8 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

Wow, thank you so much for the very detailed information! I certainly hadn't intended for you to spend so much time and energy on this, but it's very much appreciated. Your analysis will serve as a great reference for future shipments, as well.

 

I'll trim off as much excess as possible from the packaging, hold my breath, and try shipping through Parcel Select.


P.S. "More bowing, scraping... and shrubberies required." Shrubberies? Are you a big of gardening?

Message 9 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

Package-trimming won't change the price of Parcel Select unless it (1) saves you from going over into the next full-pound weight bracket (e.g., 4 pounds 15 ounces vs 5 pounds 1 ounce) or (2) keeps you from going over the length-plus-girth threshold, which is 84 inches.

 

"The backpack's dimensions are 26" x 14.5" x 6.5"" You could pack that in a box that's 29 x 17 x 10 and still be within the 84-inch limit for length-plus-girth, since 29 + (17 + 10 + 17 + 10) = 83.  Trying to make it smalle won't affect the postage cost.

Message 10 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?


@berserkerplanet wrote:

>>Dimensional weight is LxWxH / divisor.
>>The divisor for USPS is 194
>>The divisor for FedEx and UPS is 139 (If I recall correctly)

 

(just clarifying and correcting the FedEx info)


USPS
USPS domestic Dimensional Weight Divisor (DWD) is 194 for domestic pkgs and applies only to PM Z5-8
USPS international shipments: not applicable (only Length+Girth considerations apply and vary by destination)


Why do you feel the need to clarify for me when you only select a portion of my post - and an incomplete portion at that?  The immediate preceeding portion dealt with Priority Mail Zones and when DimWeight kicked in (and why).   Zones are for domestic mail.  Price groups are for international.

 

"USPS uses dimensional weight for items over 1 cu foot (1,728 cu.in) travelling via Priority to Zones 5 and above.  If Zone 4 or under, DimWeight won't kick it.  DimWeight doesn't apply to Parcel Select/Retail Ground.

 

FedEx and UPS use dimensional weight for all packages."

Message 11 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

A side note on using poly bagging instead of corrugated cardboard shipping containers.

 

[I guess feeling particularly rambly today to avoid listing items. This post arose from stumbling across the following in the UPS Service guide today while looking for Dim Weight info details]

 

–  Items Shipped in Bags:  
Shape – When multiple items are shipped in a flexible container (e.g., 
burlap or plastic bag), the package measurements will be determined 
when the exterior is at rest. As this shape will differ from placement 
to placement, cubic size or package measurements will be made at the 
sole discretion of UPS.
Tails – A tail on an item shipped in a bag should be measured for the 
amount of space it takes up in a reasonably compressed fashion. Any
tail that is created by placing an item in a bag must be compressed and 
taped to the body of the item.

FedEx doesn't go into that explanatory detail in their service guide, but it is assumed and implied by general statements in the FedEx tariffs.

 

 

It can have some bearing on shipping backpacks and other large items that are less subject to breakage or damage, and can be an option in some cases to reduce weight, and the hassle of having to construct a custom box to avoid dimensional weight and crossing size thresholds.

 

USPS doesn't care about poly mailers one way or the other as long as they are firm/tight (in the sense of not having lots of saggy material that can get caught in machinery. Like a 1 ft square object tossed into a 2 ft square poly bag). I believe you can actually just slap a label right on a suitcase or backpack (making sure it can't come off) and mail it.

 

UPS and FedEx are a bit stricter. I have shipped suitcase like popup show displays (right in their zipper nylon cases) and suitcases using FedEx with no problem. Note that these are items meant to be used, not items sold to buyers, and are expected to pick up scuffs, dings, and dirt same as if taken on an airplane as baggage. FedEx has special label pouches that ziptie right around the handles and it's fine. (Does incur a $12 additional handling surcharge due to not being in a box and in the case of the display, being very long. Still cheaper than an extra bag on airplane) UPS is about the same on this issue.

 

Anyway, another consideration that I've pondered for a while is dimensional weight of poly bagged items. Depending on the contents, they can deform, the dimensions change, and actually end up bigger for purposes of dimensional weight (I posted a poor demonstration of dimensional changes for a cardboard box that gets stepped on somewhere here a while back)

 

Although the actual volume of a deformed package doesn't change, the volume of the containing rectangular box calculated using the max dimensions of the deformed box does. This directly affects dimensional weight calculations, can happen in transit, FedEx measures new large, smashed size, and post bills for the difference.

 

Shipping Volume = 300in²

10x10x3_box_annot_400x300.jpg

 

Stepped on it and it becomes  Shipping Volume=432in²

10x10x3_box_smashed_annot_400x300.jpg

 

example: for the above pkg as an eBay FedEx Ground shipment that uses a 166 divisor,

the dimensional weight of the  original  package is 10x10x3/166 = 1.81 = 2lb

the dimensional weight of the smashed package is 12x12x3/166 = 2.60 = 3lb

 

Not much, but a surprise when the additional charge arrives.

 

The same is a consideration for poly bagged pkgs, depending what's in them. A backpack, fairly tightly bagged probably wont change shape much. Some other items could "flow" in the bag, especially if loosely bagged (clothing, multiple plush toy, etc) and the apparent volume of the bag increase same as the box did when stepped on.

 

 

 

As far as shipping backpacks in poly bags? If new and pricy, maybe not. If used -  backpacks are meant to be used hard anyway in the great outdoors and can take some punishment - then maybe.

 

A lot of the same things that could mangle a backpack frame in transit are going to do it whether in a box or a bag. Dents, and scuffs more so in a poly. Wrapping any exposed frame metal in bubblewrap, or folding a piece of cardboard over could alleviate dings and scuffs issues. Or a faux  box inside a poly could make packing easier than fabricating a box (2 big pieces of cardboard with backpack sandwiched in between, and even some sides folded over if getting fancy.)

 

Keep in mind that FedEx and UPS might add additional handling surcharges for a poly bagged pkg like that (there is no provision for it in the eBay FedEx label flow, so if they caught it it would come as an added charge when invoiced later. UPS I don't know how it would be handled or if it can be specified at label time)

 

Message 12 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

I included the Priority Mail stuff just to recap what you said which was 100% correct, and included the international stuff for general info and completeness since I was laying it all out for FedEx and UPS.

Have no idea why you are mentioning Price Groups. I said nothing about them - only that Dim Weight isn't a factor in USPS international shipments at all. (And length + girth limits are a country dependent factor for international)

I simply added to what you correctly posted.

The rest because you didn't recall correctly, and used the wrong FedEx Dimensional Weight Divisor and computed the wrong FedEx Dimensional weight in the context of eBay shipping. That can confuse everyone, including the people that google it a month or a year from now.

Didn't mean to step on your toes sob
Message 13 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

>>"More bowing, scraping... and shrubberies required."
>> Shrubberies? Are you a big of gardening?

No, a (I thought) funny response to flyerfan's accolades in post #6. Monty Python and the Holy Grail reference.
A requirement of ""The Knights Who Say Ni" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIV4poUZAQo

Your welcome. I dumped a lot out there and the other posters covered it quite well too. As you can see, it gets complicated, and shipping an apple, and a banana is not necessarily even the same thing (wow, that would be a big banana). Some services care more about size, others less so or in different ways, at certain sizes and weights some services become unavailable or prohibitively expensive, etc.

In general, as others have indicated. USPS Parcel Select is pretty much the choice for largish, not "anvil heavy" items like backpacks or Stetson Hats. FedEx/UPS a better choice for 65 pound things as their prices increase less than USPS as weight increases.

My first example to you was based on the absolute minimum, custom fabricated box size to put a lower limit on things when all services are in consideration. If Priority Mail (PM) and FedEx and UPS are off the table, and USPS Parcel Select is the method of choice, then minimizing that size is no longer critical, and best to strike a balance between big enough to pad the backpack well inside against damage, going too big and wasting packing material and extra weight, and avoiding going over 84" Length+Girth limit (causing it to ship at 20lb balloon rate) as others pointed out.

Good luck.
Message 14 of 17
latest reply

What is the most economical shipping method for sending large backpacks (65L+) in YR 2018?

If we can bear it, I'd like to reiterate one point that has been mentioned but might have been lost in the shuffle: For packages up to 84 inches, Parcel Select and Priority Mail will cost the same for buyers in USPS Zones 1 - 4; it's only the farther Zones that incur the dreaded dimensional weight.  So it makes sense to offer Priority, too, or use it as a surprise upgrade for the closer buyers.

 

 

 

2018 parcel Select & Priority to 12 pounds.png

Message 15 of 17
latest reply