01-16-2019 07:36 PM
I hope I did it wrong but I just looked into USPS dimensional weight rate change in June, I sell fishing rods using USPS box that is 38"x6"x5", which run 1-2 lbs but if I did it right dim rate would put them at 7 lb. If I did that right I'm out of business, I just checked on a fishing rod I just sold to WA and will increase shipping $10. Shipping today would be $9.85 and in June it will be $21, even more with increase the 27th. Honestly there's NO way I could double shipping rate and still sell fishing rods, that's half my income, I can't even image the tackle boxes I sell would cost.
01-16-2019 07:53 PM
Good news: you're wrong!
The dimensional weight applies only to packages with a volume over 1 cubic foot, which is 1728 cubic inches. Your package is 1140 cubic inches so it will ship at the regular weight-based rate, not at a dimensional weight.
https://about.usps.com/postal-bulletin/2018/pb22509/html/updt_002.htm
01-16-2019 08:25 PM
Whew, I miss the part about cubic foot but will still could kill about 15% of sales, any rods that measure over 58" packed and most tackle boxes unless their sold in zone's 1-4.
01-16-2019 08:59 PM
Yes, 58 inches would put you over the cubic-foot threshold, unless you can reduce one of the other dimensions.
@tsme35 wrote:
... unless their sold in zone's 1-4.
Alas, the dimensional weight will apply to all zones. That's one of the 3 big changes coming in June: (1) dimensional weight will apply to all zones (currently it's just Zones 5 - 9); (2) it will apply not only to Priority Mail but also to Parcel Select Ground and Retail Ground; and (3) the divisor will be reduced from 194 to 166.
So get all the big stuff sold before June!
01-17-2019 03:12 AM
Your rods seem short unless they are for ice fishing or are sectional style. My son who is a crazy bass fisherman get rods shipped in round tubes (3'"to 4" dia) 7' to 8' long. He recently received shipment to zone 5 via USPS Priority with no surcharge & UPS ground. I understand things are changing mid year - maybe you fishing rod sellers need to let USPS know what you think about it, companies like Academy & Bass Pro, etc will be affected too.
01-17-2019 06:09 AM
01-17-2019 06:16 AM
Starting in June, the dimensional weight will be applied to all zones.
01-17-2019 06:25 AM
01-17-2019 06:46 AM
A triangular box doesn't have the same cubic inch volume as a rectangular box. The "height" of the triangle is shorter than any of the sides (yikes, flashbacks to geometry class!). From the usps.com pages on calculating postage:
01-17-2019 09:06 AM
01-17-2019 09:35 AM
01-17-2019 01:44 PM
01-17-2019 07:55 PM - edited 01-17-2019 07:56 PM
https://community.ebay.com/t5/Shipping-Returns/Where-To-Get-Long-Boxes-for-Shipping/m-p/27238960/hig...
https://community.ebay.com/t5/Archive-Shipping-Returns/Shipping-with-USPS-Medium-Tubes-cost-Anybody-...
A lot of that is still applicable, except the 194 divisor will be changing, balloon will be no more, and Z1-4/Z5-8 difference will go away, so all the balloon stuff in that post can be ignored after 1/27/19.
One of the "safe" maximum lengths based on cross sectional tube dimensions, Length+Girth, and the 1cu-ft (1728in³) Dim Weight volume threshold previously calculated is still correct (65" for the O-1098M tube), but for the O-1098S tube things change...
Some surprising good news I didn't realize until playing with the numbers just now - because the Length+Girth balloon criterion is going away, it looks like the new max lengths for the two sizes of USPS triangular tubes frankenboxed, where tube doesn't exceed the 1728 in³ dim weight threshold and just ships at actual weight will be:
O-1098M medium tubes = 65" (same as before)
O-1098S small tubes = 76" (woohoo!)
(even the 76" O-1098S tube is still under the 108" L+G number to avoid Parcel Select oversize status, and still be Priority Mail "legal")
So a 6' fishing pole can still ship at a 2 or 3 lb Priority Mail rate, and probably even a 6'6" pole if it bends a little to fit in the 76" tube.
Note that if the O-1098S 76" max length is exceeded (or the O-1098M 65"), it gets really ugly really fast since dim weight at 1729 in³ = 1729/194 = 9 lb and in June when the new 166 divisor kicks in it will be 1729in³/166 = 11 lb. A possible 2 lb pkg becomes a 9 or 11 lb pkg from adding 1/2" to the length. Caution is advised.
(I may rework and repost that old triangular tube post later after the dust settles in June to reflect the new situation)
01-18-2019 07:32 AM
01-18-2019 01:25 PM