04-16-2019 02:59 AM
I need six 1" glass marbles for a project.
I came across a listing for 2 pounds of 1" glass marbles for $23.99 with free shipping.
I'm not sure how many marbles are in 2 pounds but i'm sure t's way more than i need.
I messaged the seller and explained how i only need 6 marbles. If he would be willing to sell me 6, let me know how much.
The seller replied with "sorry such a small amount is not cost worthy for me to sell". Why would he say that without knowing how much i'm willing to pay for 6 of them? Why not make me an offer? 6 marbles for $5 or 6 marbles for $10 or 6 marbles for $20 ... whatever he thinks is worth his time and effort? But to just say "NO" is very poor business sense in my opinion.
04-17-2019 12:43 PM
@amp_global wrote:I simply refuse to use Michaels, I asked the manager of my local branch to move the main entrance 3 feet to the left (my personal feng shui reasons) he flat out refused my reasonable request, I reported him and I have never heard back from them.
I haven't really followed many of your posts, so I don't know if this was said in humour.
04-17-2019 12:46 PM
Apologies, my idea of humor along the lines of unreasonable requests, I am English,that's my excuse and I'm sticking with it 🙂
04-17-2019 03:12 PM
@jeannicho22 wrote:
@castlemagicmemories wrote:Ran out of edit time
So insurance doesn't cover pedestrians using the drive thru, and if something happens, they won't pay a claim. The establishment doesn't want to deal with a claim because that is what they have insurance for.
Thus no pedestrian service at drive thrus.
Having been privy to company policies, I can assure you it was for insurance reasons.
04-17-2019 03:15 PM
04-17-2019 03:19 PM - edited 04-17-2019 03:19 PM
@castlemagicmemories wrote:
@jeannicho22 wrote:
@castlemagicmemories wrote:Ran out of edit time
So insurance doesn't cover pedestrians using the drive thru, and if something happens, they won't pay a claim. The establishment doesn't want to deal with a claim because that is what they have insurance for.
Thus no pedestrian service at drive thrus.
Ran out of edit time.
That is an interesting theory, though.
04-17-2019 03:27 PM - edited 04-17-2019 03:29 PM
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-it-illegal-to-walk-by-foot-to-a-drive-through-window
An excerpt:
For the reason it isn't allowed, it is primarily…
Because of “lawyers and insurance companies” as a dear friend says it. Due to the litigious society we live in and the lack of people taking personal responsibility for their actions in general, lots of people and places no longer allow all sorts of things!
04-17-2019 03:32 PM
I'd say no too.
04-17-2019 04:21 PM - edited 04-17-2019 04:23 PM
@castlemagicmemories wrote:
@jeannicho22 wrote:
@castlemagicmemories wrote:Ran out of edit time
So insurance doesn't cover pedestrians using the drive thru, and if something happens, they won't pay a claim. The establishment doesn't want to deal with a claim because that is what they have insurance for.
Thus no pedestrian service at drive thrus.
Having been privy to company policies, I can assure you it was for insurance reasons.
I understand your position, however since I do believe walk ups to a window where an employee is literally an inch away and often late at night is dangerous to the employee, I have no choice to believe it is for more than insurance reasons. You should watch some YouTube vids where employees get pummeled at the drive thru by customers.
04-17-2019 04:25 PM
@amp_global wrote:Apologies, my idea of humor along the lines of unreasonable requests, I am English,that's my excuse and I'm sticking with it 🙂
Actually I love British humour. I just didn't catch the accent.
04-17-2019 04:41 PM
@amp_global wrote:I simply refuse to use Michaels, I asked the manager of my local branch to move the main entrance 3 feet to the left (my personal feng shui reasons) he flat out refused my reasonable request, I reported him and I have never heard back from them.
04-17-2019 04:43 PM - edited 04-17-2019 04:46 PM
@jeannicho22 wrote:
@castlemagicmemories wrote:
@jeannicho22 wrote:
@castlemagicmemories wrote:Ran out of edit time
So insurance doesn't cover pedestrians using the drive thru, and if something happens, they won't pay a claim. The establishment doesn't want to deal with a claim because that is what they have insurance for.
Thus no pedestrian service at drive thrus.
Having been privy to company policies, I can assure you it was for insurance reasons.
I understand your position, however since I do believe walk ups to a window where an employee is literally an inch away and often late at night is dangerous to the employee, I have no choice to believe it is for more than insurance reasons. You should watch some YouTube vids where employees get pummeled at the drive thru by customers.
And I understand yours. Perhaps insurance reasons were the predecessor and initial reasoning in a kinder, gentler time, prior to employee pummeling. I am not advocating employee pummeling by any means~but employee pummeling could also be covered under insurance reasons.
We can agree to disagree.
04-17-2019 08:38 PM
@amp_global wrote:Apologies, my idea of humor along the lines of unreasonable requests, I am English,that's my excuse and I'm sticking with it 🙂
Humor in a class of its own. For a fun but somewhat shocking read, I recommend the erotic humor that was recorded for posterity in the Victorian era magazine The Pearl and follow up with massive book that's worth the effort of lifting it and turning the kajillion pages The Rationale of the Dirty Joke (1968) which is not exclusively English humor by any means but which provides examples that highlight what I used to call the "a bridge too far" characteristic of English (or British, depending on the period you look at) humor that eventually gained better appreciation in the USA through Monty Python.
I confess to being quite addicted to the humor of the British Isles, bawdy and otherwise. I blame my parents, who as Canadians, thought the most wicked fun they could indulge in, entertainment-wise, was to attend any of the Carry On Gang movies. My parents dragged me and my brother to at least 20 of them from 1958 onward. My brother and I hated them at first, but like with the Borg, we eventually accepted that resistance is futile.
04-17-2019 09:15 PM
@city*satins wrote:
Humor in a class of its own. For a fun but somewhat shocking read, I recommend the erotic humor that was recorded for posterity in the Victorian era magazine The Pearl and follow up with massive book that's worth the effort of lifting it and turning the kajillion pages The Rationale of the Dirty Joke (1968) which is not exclusively English humor by any means but which provides examples that highlight what I used to call the "a bridge too far" characteristic of English (or British, depending on the period you look at) humor that eventually gained better appreciation in the USA through Monty Python.
Funny you should mention Monty Python. I have Season 2, Episode 5 paused on Netflix in the other room while I came in here to check email. I can't believe I'm seeing the same episodes I first saw too many decades ago, and they're still funny.
I confess to being quite addicted to the humor of the British Isles, bawdy and otherwise. I blame my parents, who as Canadians, thought the most wicked fun they could indulge in, entertainment-wise, was to attend any of the Carry On Gang movies. My parents dragged me and my brother to at least 20 of them from 1958 onward. My brother and I hated them at first, but like with the Borg, we eventually accepted that resistance is futile.
Funny you should mention that too. I inherited a stack of Carry On DVDs from a relative, along with a region-free player to play them on, sat stone-faced through a couple of them, and haven't seen any of the others. I just didn't find them anywhere near as funny as the Python episodes, I think partly because they couldn't quite bring themselves to actually be as... bawdy, or something, as they clearly wanted to be, whereas the Python gang had no problem with putting into their shows whatever they wanted to do in the name of humor.
I should mention here that I am British myself, so I definitely appreciate British humor when I see it.
It's just not as funny when you start to sense that the performers are holding back for whatever reason: Broadcast Standards, censorship, fear of an R rating or broadcast ban, who knows. But Monty Python as is entertaining as ever, where the Carry On films just don't seem to have aged as well.
04-18-2019 04:41 AM
I never liked the Monty Python stuff, but I still watch repeats of all the Carry On movies. Carry On Don't Lose Your Head as always been my favourite.
04-18-2019 04:45 AM