cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.

Good morning all ...

 

I've been browsing the forum this morning and have seen a lot of comments about "New dimensional weight" pricing and there seems to be a bit of confusion going on.

 

 

Not all USPS packages are affected by this change. Shipping regular sized boxes is not affected.

 

First Class Package services is not affected at all. Only lightweight oversized boxes shipped Priority, Priority Express and Parcel are affected.

 

""Oversized" = a total dimension of over 1 cubic foot.

 

If you are shipping small items in a box, padded envelope or poly mailer ... this does not affect you at all.

 

Priority has always had what was called a "balloon rate" charge for oversized packages.  In fact, between January and today, the balloon rate charges have been suspended altogether because of the delay in making this change ... before the regular January increase, you were charged dim weight at the old formula. This s nothing new. They have only changed the way it is calculated.

 

Shipping Easy has a really good explanation, easy to understand:

 

https://shippingeasy.com/blog/2019-dimensional-weight-changes/

 

 

penguins_dont_fly is a Volunteer Community Mentor
Buying and Selling since 2013

Message 1 of 17
latest reply
16 REPLIES 16

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.

To add to my post ... If you use USPS packaging or eBay branded boxes ...

 

There are no USPS branded boxes that are over 1 cubic foot. (Unless you have some old Regional C boxes laying around).

 

There is only 1 eBay branded box that would be considered oversized ... and I don't even think they carry it anymore... 18x14x12

penguins_dont_fly is a Volunteer Community Mentor
Buying and Selling since 2013

Message 2 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.


@penguins_dont_fly wrote: ... Not all USPS packages are affected by this change. Shipping regular sized boxes is not affected.

 

First Class Package services is not affected at all. Only lightweight oversized boxes shipped Priority, Priority Express and Parcel are affected.

 

""Oversized" = a total dimension of over 1 cubic foot....


USPS uses the term "Oversized" in a different way: To describe Parcel Select Ground and Retail Ground packages that have a length-plus-girth over 108 inches.  So it's best to not use that term to describe packages that are subject to the dimensional weight policies.

 

As noted, dimensional weight only affects packages that are over 1 cubic foot (1728 cubic inches).

 

There are 3 changes:

1. Dimensional weight now applies to all zones, not just 5 - 9.

2. Dimensional weight now applies to Parcel Select Ground as well as to Priority Mail.

3.  The divisor, formerly 194, is now 166.

Message 3 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.

I think the problem that most sellers will have with this is that if the dimensions or packaging preferences are not already specified in the listing, they still have to provide those for any PM shipment. Most packages probably do not go over the one cubic foot threshold, but there's no way to know it until those dimensions are given.
Message 4 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.

@nobody*s_perfect 

 

I know that 🙂

 

I was really just trying to keep it simple for the "I can't afford to ship in a box" panic-stricken folks. And why I linked the very user-friendly explanation from Shipping Easy.

penguins_dont_fly is a Volunteer Community Mentor
Buying and Selling since 2013

Message 5 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.


@beez5720 wrote:
I think the problem that most sellers will have with this is that if the dimensions or packaging preferences are not already specified in the listing, they still have to provide those for any PM shipment. Most packages probably do not go over the one cubic foot threshold, but there's no way to know it until those dimensions are given.

Yes.  Which it is why sellers should be vigilant about providing exact package sizing when listing.

 

penguins_dont_fly is a Volunteer Community Mentor
Buying and Selling since 2013

Message 6 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.


@beez5720 wrote:
I think the problem that most sellers will have with this is that if the dimensions or packaging preferences are not already specified in the listing, they still have to provide those for any PM shipment. Most packages probably do not go over the one cubic foot threshold, but there's no way to know it until those dimensions are given.

We have always needed to be conscientious of the box dimensions when listing, due to the rates to far off zones.  When I buy items I have always imagined the box size before making my final decision.  

 

Sellers that didn't take the size into account would complain about where the seller lived and want to block those locations since the calculator didn't charge enough, but they could have avoided the problem by listing properly.  Now a seller can't be lazy and hope for a local sale to bail them out.

Message 7 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.


@penguins_dont_fly wrote:

Good morning all ...

 

I've been browsing the forum this morning and have seen a lot of comments about "New dimensional weight" pricing and there seems to be a bit of confusion going on.

 

 

Not all USPS packages are affected by this change. Shipping regular sized boxes is not affected.

 

First Class Package services is not affected at all. Only lightweight oversized boxes shipped Priority, Priority Express and Parcel are affected.

 

""Oversized" = a total dimension of over 1 cubic foot.


I plan to get some clarity today on whether or not USPS Retail Ground has the dim weights ... the eBay calculator is showing the dim weights for Retail Ground, but the USPS Notice 123 does not.   The postmaster at my local branch said that they wouldn't be able to tell me one way or another until today (after the software updates).

Message 8 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.

I am confused by what USPS services are available for large heavy packages over 1 cu ft (e.g. over 10 pounds). Are all the service options available from ebay labels?

 

Today if see just priority mail, express priority, and parcel select.

 

I look forward to your findings, @orangehound. Currently eBay shows the cost of priority and parcel select are about the same.

 

It would think USPS would provide some alternative services at lower prices.

Message 9 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.

fed ex has been doing that for years

Message 10 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.


@mycheaperstuff wrote:

I am confused by what USPS services are available for large heavy packages over 1 cu ft (e.g. over 10 pounds). Are all the service options available from ebay labels?

 

Today if see just priority mail, express priority, and parcel select.

 

I look forward to your findings, @orangehound. Currently eBay shows the cost of priority and parcel select are about the same.

 

It would think USPS would provide some alternative services at lower prices.


@mycheaperstuff 

The results of my questions are in this thread

https://community.ebay.com/t5/Selling/How-to-ship-large-packages-via-USPS-shipping-WITHOUT-dimension...

 

However, that doesn't necessarily address large heavy packages ... just large.

Message 11 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.


@mycheaperstuff wrote:

I am confused by what USPS services are available for large heavy packages over 1 cu ft (e.g. over 10 pounds). Are all the service options available from ebay labels?

 

Today if see just priority mail, express priority, and parcel select.

 

I look forward to your findings, @orangehound. Currently eBay shows the cost of priority and parcel select are about the same.

 

It would think USPS would provide some alternative services at lower prices.


@mycheaperstuff 

 

"Heavy" is relative.

 

The way Dim Weight works is that you pay whichever is greater ... the dimensional weight or actual weight.

 

USPS has a Max weight of 70 lbs.

 

Screenshot_2019-06-26-06-49-38_kindlephoto-577129558.pngScreenshot_2019-06-26-06-49-51_kindlephoto-577276105.png

 

penguins_dont_fly is a Volunteer Community Mentor
Buying and Selling since 2013

Message 12 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.

I ship large 24/12/12 or 18/18/18 boxes all the time.  Very seldom can I use USPS due to the extra charges.  FEDEX is my go to shipper.

This quest stands on the edge of a blade...stray but a little and you shall fail to the ruin of us all.
"The Lady Galadriel"
Message 13 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.

So … I just threw together a very simple (non-professional LOL) flow chart for anybody who might still have questions about whether Dim Weight applies when using USPS for shipping.

 

FLOWCHART.jpg

penguins_dont_fly is a Volunteer Community Mentor
Buying and Selling since 2013

Message 14 of 17
latest reply

Re: Misconceptions about the USPS Dim Weight increase.

borat-very-nice.jpg

Message 15 of 17
latest reply