10-08-2018 04:41 AM
Hey Ebay community,
so time to time I sell a few but not much accessries for smart phones and tablets.
My storie goes like these:
in the end of the August, I sold one case/holder/wallet for iPad Air 2 with economy shipping without tracking code. Buyer payed $15,99 for the item. The item was shipped with priority mail and tracked. So the buyer got his item in less than 15 days. After 28 days from the date when he recived his item he claims that the item is defective and it is not worth of sending it back and that he wants full refund. I asked him to elaborate his statements and give me some proof aka pictures. Of course he didn't respond to my message. I believe if he would be honest, he would give more clear resone and elaborate his statements. Now I have only two options 1. give him a full refund and take the loss or 2. pay almost $40 for returning shipping and hope that he failes to return the item.
Ebay and PayPal are stating that the sellers are protected but they actually mean that you as a seller are protected but not against fraudulent buyers. As I see now there is a lot of buyers who are just praying to stole items from the honest sellers.
So that is why I belive that eBay and PayPal are supporting dishonest and lying buyers. They are also encouraging them to taht.
So my question:
Does any of you go to the store and take products from it without paying for them? Probably not. And if you don't like the products that you bought, you take them back to the store on your costs and not on their cost.
It is funny how eBay and PayPal immediately take their portion, if your item is sold.
Hope that someone someday will bring some kind lawsuit against that kind of practices.
Regards,
Jure
10-08-2018 07:26 PM
The bottom line is that you do not have to refund the buyer unless he returns the item. It doesn't matter whether he thinks it's not worth returning. Only you can decide if you want to refund him without the returning the item. You could call his bluff, and tell him to return it for full refund, but you would have to pay the return shipping. You would only be charged for the return shipping label if they actually return the item assuming of course he doesn't substitute for something else or send you an empty box.
10-08-2018 07:50 PM
10-09-2018 11:00 AM
As the defect on my seller score, he already gave me negative feedback.
This is not a Defect. Feedback is not used by eBay as a measure of your selling account.
About location.
I'm more flexible about this than an American would be.
The purpose of specifying location I believe is to let the buyer know that the Thing may not arrive quickly, since it is overseas, and that there may be duty or sales taxes on it as well as customs brokerage fees.
From that point of view, that the location says Croatia but shipping is from China makes no never mind.
However, it is a Bad Practice to allow this, since enough sellers will purposefully or naively misunderstand and give their location as New Jersey (fast delivery, no import fees) when the shipment is actually coming from Jersey (in the English Channel, with import fees and longer delivery period).
10-17-2018 07:30 AM
10-17-2018 08:15 AM
He's got you. When ebay was fair they would look at the situation and see it is buyer error. Now there's no such thing. Buyer's right even when they are wrong.
10-17-2018 08:38 AM
Ebay and paypal are no different from any other online venue for third party sellers. " In retail "the customer was always right" (even when they weren't) was the mantra - now "the buyer is always right". Ebay is no different than Amazon when it comes to seller "protection".
If you want to control your own business - set up your own website and payment processor - otherwise you have to live with the rules set by the sites and processors you use and all abuses they permit.
10-17-2018 08:42 AM
Ebay was uninvolved not "fair" in the early days. There is no way they can be "fair" to both the buyer and seller nor determine who is honest or dishonest.
10-17-2018 08:49 AM
@kathieskorner wrote:Ebay was uninvolved not "fair" in the early days. There is no way they can be "fair" to both the buyer and seller nor determine who is honest or dishonest.
Uninvolved was better.
Yes they can be "fair" to both seller and buyer when buyer reveals it is buyer remorse falsely claimed as snad, or just plain remorse. That was policy until recently.
10-17-2018 03:42 PM
Take the neg.
eBay doesn’t ‘ count negs as defects.
Uou can add a response to the Meg “Refused to return for full refund”.
Sorry aboutspelling