Confederate Flags

[north*star*collectiblesco.]

I do not understand why U.S. history is not revered. I just tried to post three 1861 civil war patriotic covers and received the "banned" notice. This is our nations history, is this an agenda to not recognize the facts, is it revisionist history?  This is not hate. There were 11 states that wanted this, they just happened to lose the vote. This is free speech. Sweep it under the rug and participate in an agenda that looks to modify history according to their values and interests. Aside from the fact that it kills off the collectible market for this patriotic covers category. Only northern civil war illustrations are allowed? Take about censoring, this is it 100%. What does this community think? In any case, I will only list northern attitude messages and images.

[funfactorychannel]

just sell it on BanOnEbay🤣

[movieman630]

Best not to post your objections to such things on here.

[oletooks]

gone.c.33 WHAT?

[oletooks]

Question:  is this government over reach or as some might say or an interpretation by parties that don't want to tell the factual history of what really happened?

[doc-holmes]

---

@baantiques wrote:

Even the US Park Service is engaging in revisionist history WRT to the Confederate flag.  All the interpretive films I've seen at battlefields have the Confederates carrying the Stars and Bars flag rather than the one they actually carried.  Stupid.

---

I'll agree. That's ridiculous. 

[gone.c-33]

I said what I said.

[ed8108]

---

@mam98031 wrote:

Free Speech = is the right of a person to articulate opinions and ideas without interference or retaliation from the government. 

---

Prudence dictates exercise caution, unfortunately interference or retaliation may arise from non government actors

[johnrj1226]

This Rolling Stones 1969 song title should shed some insight into your issue  >>>>                                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ef9QnZVpVd8

[mam98031]

---

@ed8108 wrote:

---

@mam98031 wrote:

Free Speech = is the right of a person to articulate opinions and ideas without interference or retaliation from the government. 

---

Prudence dictates exercise caution, unfortunately interference or retaliation may arise from non government actors

---

This is NOT a government site @ed8108 .  As for "retaliation", you'd need to be a bit more specific about that as I'm not sure what you are referring to.