07-27-2016 10:13 AM
So I sell a cassette collection via BIN to a buyer in Hawaii over the 4th of July weekend. Buyer had the option to have it sent with Expedited Shipping but declined, so it was sent "standard" via Media Mail. I use eBay's labeling system, package up the item, and take it the PO for dispatch.
Later that afternoon, I get a message from eBay saying the buyer had requested to cancel their order, but since package had already been sent, eBay had informed buyer on my behalf it was too late to cancel. I call eBay about this as I had never run into this problem before, and they say, "no worries -- we've informed you and the buyer what's going on -- you need do nothing more."
After I mail out any eBay purchases, I always check eBay's tracking info and the USPS site to make sure they're on their way. Within 24 hrs of pick up at the PO this woman's package arrived at the USPS sorting center in Warrendale, PA awaiting further dispatch. A few days later I check again, and the status is the same, so the next time I go to the PO I ask them why it seems to be just sitting there and whether I should be concerned.
The answer was no. Media Mail to Hawaii from the Mainland usually takes 3-5 weeks as the PO aggregates the packages until they have sufficient quantity to merit onward shipment. Media Mail is the last to be shipped. They tell me to keep checking on its status and if the package hasn't been delivered in 4 wks time then to file a lost package trace request as it's too soon to do so now.
A few days later, I notice the buyer has lodged negative feedback against me. Reason being "I refuse to communicate." Huh? I never have heard a thing from this woman. Any/all communication I got about the order was from eBay -- not her. On top of that, I had spoken to eBay when I received the notice from them that they had denied the buyer's request to cancel the order and they had told me "everything's fine -- you don't need to do anything more."
So I call eBay about the negative feedback comment. They look at the trasaction and eBay message records. They agree that the buyer's negative feedback was unwarranted and removed it.
Another week goes by and I get another message from eBay. This time telling me the buyer had opened a case because "item had not been received" and that I need to provide eBay with tracking info. Huh?
Tracking info was instantly/automatically put into the transaction the second I printed the label via eBay's labelling system. Yes, I double-checked. It was and is still there plain as day so what in the heck are they talking about that they need me to provide the information?
But, I respond within minutes of the request giving eBay the tracking number, carrier, plus additional information about the fact buyer had opted for Media Mail shipping which takes 3-5 wks which PO confirmed. Since it's only been two weeks, I cannot file a trace request but was advised by PO if package doesn't arrive in 4 wks time to do it then, which I intended to do and would keep all posted.
Same info was sent to the buyer. I hear not one word from the woman AGAIN. No, "Thank you for the update. I'll let you know when it arrives. I'd like to send it back when it does because XYZ," etc. Absolute "radio silence" from her end, once again. **bleep**?
So I call eBay to discuss the situation and verify they received the information I sent them. They tell me "Yes, I see it here. You did everything right -- there's no reason to be concerned or nothing more you need to do."
SO TODAY, (you guessed it), I get a message from eBay saying they have closed the case, decided in the buyer's favor, and refunded her money. The reason? "Tracking info I provided was invalid." Come again?
I call eBay and the CS Rep tells me, "Yes, you did everything right, but the buyer didn't get her item so she has a legitimate complaint." I ask the woman if she can see the info I had relayed about usual Media Mail transit times to Hawaii, that the buyer opted NOT to use expedited shipping, and that PO had informed me that 4 wks need to go buy before I should file a lost package trace.
She says, "Yes I can see all that and I understand, but once a buyer opens a case, we let seven days go by and if there's no status change in the tracking info, we consider the info you provided to us as "invalid" and close the case in favor of the buyer."
I ask her again if she understands this package was sent to Hawaii not the lower 48 states, and the usual Media Mail shipping time is 3-5 wks which the buyer agreed to and enough time hasn't elapsed for the package to reach the buyer yet and my hands are tied trying to trace it until the first week on August according to the PO.
Her response? "Yes, I understand that, but your appeal will be denied because the buyer hasn't received the item so her complaint is legitimate."
So I ask her what happens when the item shows up. "Nothing," she says. "eBays already closed the case so there's no reason for us to get involved. If you want to try and send the buyer an invoice and ask her to pay for the item *outside of eBay* you can, but eBay won't intercede as the case is already closed."
I can't believe my ears.
I then ask her if there are other ramifications to this debacle and she says: "No, the buyer can't leave any negative feedback for you, but yes, since the order wasn't fulfilled it will count against you."
At that point, I had just about had it and said: "You mean to tell me, that despite the fact you and others at eBay have told me numerous times that "I did everything right" and provided you with everything your requested in a timely manner and kept everyone involved in the loop, that not only am I out an item which I am left to my own devices to get shipped back or paid for, you're penalizing me for something I have no control over -- a "crime" that hasn't even been proven to have been comitted since the requisite amount of time hasn't even elapsed yet for the item to be verified lost or for that matter delivered?"
Her answer? "Well, you could have avoided the problem entirely if you had just sent it Priority Mail. It would have gotten there in a timely manner and if it did get lost it would have been insured."
Gob-smacked doesn't quite cover it...
I said to her, let's not hash over the fact again that IT WAS THE BUYER that opted for Media Mail shipping, but if that's eBay's position (not to use Media Mail), then why doesn't eBay make it impossible for sellers to ship an item any other way, or at the very least have an auto warning message come up that says: "Due to significant delays in shipping from the Mainland to Hawaii (or vice-versa) we strongly suggest you use Priority Mail instead of Media Mail in order to expedite delivery and avoid your seller opening a 'Item Not Received' case against the transaction due to probable time required for delivery."
Her response? "Oh, we would never do that because we want sellers to have control over how they choose to sell and ship their items. Besides, I don't see why you're so concerned, you have 100% positive feedback and Top Seller status -- this incident isn't going to make a difference."
I kid you not! That's what she said. SImply incredible. So I hung up and told her: "Have a nice day."
So, moral of the story:
-- If you're selling an item that ordinarily is allowable and can be shipped via Media Mail and the buyer is in Hawaii, DON'T send it Media Mail. Either cough up the extra money to send it Priority Mail yourself, indicate in your listing that expedited shipping is required for buyers that aren't in the lower 48 states, or don't allow bidders outside of the lower 48 to bid at all.
-- Or, change your Media Mail listings to Priority Mail to avoid the problem all together, though in my case most of my "Media Mail items" sell for so little, the cost of expedited shipping would double or triple the total amount due, which is a buyer deterrent -- which is why I am not in favor of going that route.
-- Realize that even though eBay has denied a buyer's request to cancel an item after it has been shipped, that doesn't mean they can't blast you with negative feedback however unwarranted. IOW, you'd best keep eBay on your speed dial as you'll be talking to them a lot to get things straightened out.
-- Though I realize there are divergent opinions about whether to put bidders on a BBL, the buyer in question is now on mine and will stay there permanently.
-- If an eBay CS Rep tells you "You've done everything right, there's no need to worry" -- don't count on it.
-- For those who are wondering, yes I will be filing a lost package trace request with the PO in another week, though I fully expect the package will show up in due time.
-- And finally, I'm not totally convinced that the buyer wasn't trying to pull a fast one from the get-go given her behavior, but if she wants to scam me out of eight bucks that bad, she can have it. I'm not going to waste any more time or emotional energy on chasing her down for the money or demanding my item back. Just not worth it.
Apologies for the length of this, but hopefully there's some value in sharing what happened -- especially when it comes to how eBay chose to handle the matter, which on one hand is mind-blowing, but on the other, sadly the way it seems it goes.
Regardless, thanks for listening to me vent. Keep calm, and sell on!
Solved! Go to Best Answer
07-27-2016 12:47 PM
I highly recommend you contact Consumerist with your story ...
tips@consumerist.com
They LOVE a story like this.
07-27-2016 01:07 PM - edited 07-27-2016 01:11 PM
@luckythewinner wrote:
What is a "late delivery defect"?
If you ship with tracking and the tracking is scanned within your handling time, I believe the transaction does not count against your on-time shipping metric, even if it is never delivered.
Unlucky
New on-time shipping metric
You'll be recognized for on-time shipping if tracking shows your item was either shipped within the stated handling time or delivered by the estimated delivery date. If there's no tracking available, we'll check with your buyer. If your buyer confirms the item was delivered on time—you'll be recognized for on-time shipping.
Shipments will be considered late only when:
This is part of what drove all our discussions earlier in the year about USPS acceptance scans and how so many people were reporting that their PO and/or tracking weren't showing these. Hence eBay resorts to THEIR "estimated delivery dates" which we know are about as reliable as their CS reps having English as their first language.
07-27-2016 01:11 PM
Actually, none of that story was a surprise. I'm guessing you also received an unresolved by seller case on your record, which is the worst part of all in my opinion.
When I first started selling I sold an item that went ground shipping to Hawaii. I quickly learned to never ever do that. Whatever it takes, find a way to ship with an air mail method even it costs more to avoid this issue.
07-27-2016 01:56 PM
@brad62853 wrote:@
This is part of what drove all our discussions earlier in the year about USPS acceptance scans and how so many people were reporting that their PO and/or tracking weren't showing these. Hence eBay resorts to THEIR "estimated delivery dates" which we know are about as reliable as their CS reps having English as their first language.
brad62853,
Exactly my point. The poster did not receive a "defect", he simply had a transaction which was not considered to be on time.
And the slowness of media mail was not the sole reason that happened. It was counted as late because ...
a) he did not obtain a timely acceptance scan; AND
b) he did not receive a timely transit scan; AND
c) it did not receive a timely delivery scan; AND
d) the buyer did not state that it was delivered on time when leaving feedback
Unlucky
07-27-2016 02:06 PM
Didn't the OP get a defect because the buyer escalated the case for a refund?
07-27-2016 02:49 PM
I did nit have Alaska / Hawaiii untill after I got the defect. Then I blocked.
Go to your seller dashboard to see how you can get impacted by late delivery.
Tuesday, Jun 28, 2016 11:23 AM | Honolulu , HI | Package delivered by local post office |
Tuesday, Jun 28, 2016 6:52 AM | Honolulu , HI | Package out for local post office delivery |
Tuesday, Jun 28, 2016 6:42 AM | Honolulu , HI | Package sorted by local post office |
Tuesday, Jun 28, 2016 3:31 AM | Honolulu , HI | Received by the local post office |
Sunday, Jun 19, 2016 5:41 AM | Richmond , CA | Package processed by Post Office |
Saturday, Jun 18, 2016 6:35 PM | Richmond , CA | Package transferred to local post office |
Saturday, Jun 18, 2016 12:35 PM | Richmond , CA | Package processed by Post Office |
Friday, Jun 17, 2016 3:27 PM | Richmond , CA | Electronic Shipment Information Received for Package by Post Office |
Friday, Jun 17, 2016 11:13 AM | San Leandro , CA | Package departed UPS Mail Innovations facility enroute to USPS for induction |
Friday, Jun 17, 2016 11:01 AM | San Leandro , CA | Postage Paid/Ready for destination post office entry |
Friday, Jun 17, 2016 9:45 AM | San Leandro , CA | Package received for sort by destination UPS Mail Innovations facility |
Wednesday, Jun 15, 2016 2:53 AM | Auburn , WA | Package transferred to destination UPS Mail Innovations facility |
Wednesday, Jun 15, 2016 1:18 AM | Auburn , WA | Package processed by UPS Mail Innovations origin facility |
Tuesday, Jun 14, 2016 6:33 PM | Roseburg , OR | Shipment tendered to UPS Mail Innovations |
07-27-2016 03:11 PM
@usmc*usnmom wrote:All this angst over Anne Murray!
Did it by any chance weigh under a pound? It could have been sent First Class. I can't see three cassettes weighing over a pound, but I suppose it's possible with packaging. Anyway it's all water under the bridge at this point.
Sorry you got an impatient buyer.
No,unfortunately it weighed a tad over a pound. There were three cassettes plus a booklet and a special protective plastic rack/slip case that was part of the deal.
Perhaps if I had just slapped the whole lot in a mylar envelope and let the contents rattle around and let the chips fall where they may, it would have tipped the scales at an ounce or two less and First Class would have been possible.
But, IMO packaging an item well so it arrives intact and makes a positive impression when the buyer gets it is as important as the rest of the process of describing an item accurately, taking and posting good photos, responding to bidder/buyer inquiries, etc. My bad for having "standards," I guess. 😞
Yeah, I know. All this drama all for good 'ol Anne... Hope she appreciates my toil and trouble on her behalf! 🙂
07-27-2016 03:15 PM
Here's another thought. I have had buyers request FEDEX shipping (for the same $3 first class postage noted in the listing). I am NOT going across town to FEDEX to ship. I use what I say I will in my listing and dont offer anything else. I had a buyer neg me for using FC instead of FEDEX and Ebay removed the neg because I used the shipping method stated and it arrived in a reasonable time for FC. Never let teh buyer set the terms you dont want to use.
When the delivery confirmation shows delivered file a dispute of your own! Delivered and kept but refunded based on non-receipt.
07-27-2016 03:17 PM
@shawk2011 wrote:
Since it is still in PA can you do a package intercept and get it shipped back to you? You can do it online I think. This buyer MAY have done this before hence the the opting for Media mail, and then the cancel request after you shipped.
A great way to get free items from sellers who ebay won't back up. I think a package intercept is around 12.00, but you will get your item back. You can bet the buyer will NOT repay you once they get the item as they already asked to cancel.
Bood luck and let us know how it turns out.
Good idea shawk2011, about doing an intercept. Problem is, the charge for getting it sent back to me would be almost double what the set sold for in the first place, so I'm not real eager to throw more good money after bad.
And yeah, I smell a rat in all of this too regarding the buyer knew exactly what she was doing. eBay (ha-ha) also told me that they have made a notation in the buyer's record and will be monitoring her behavior to make sure she isn't doing this routinely. (double ha-ha).
However, I will remember the option you mentioned as a possible remedy if I have something similar happen in the future and the item's value would be worth the additional investment to get it back. Thanks for reminding me it's a possible remedy.
07-27-2016 03:23 PM
@nowthatsjustducky wrote:The AK/HI/U.S. Territories blocks are global. You can not block them from only select shipping services. Guess it would make for too much common sense for them to tweak the Ship To check boxes so that those are options for any shipping service selected that could be specifically added or excluded.
Oh, darn. I was afraid that would be the case, nowthatsjustducky. And yes, I agree. Seems ridiculous there isn't an option to be more specific regarding how you wish to handle/list individual listings when it comes to shipping restrictions.
I find it interesting that eBay doesn't offer that convention, when Etsy, which in a lot of ways pretty rudimentary selling platform when compared to eBay, DOES offer sellers the ability to specify where you don't want to ship to including individual US states, on each and every item you list.
If Etsy managed to figure it out, you'd think the 5,000 pound gorilla would be able to, too... ;>
07-27-2016 03:32 PM
@smkcbk wrote:
@dbmm-media wrote:
Although I did not lose my money or my item, I got a late delivery defect from a Hawaii shipment.
I ended up blocking Alaska and Hawaii.
s@mkcbk wrote:
You're lucky you didn't lose your money. I had something similar happen with a shipment to Saipan, in the Mariana Islands. Tracking showed it departed Jamaica NY and then fell off the map. A month later I refunded the buyer, then filed a claim with USPS (it was priority), but then another month later the USPS found the package (in the US) and re-routed and delivered it. I was out the item and the money, and the buyer got their item (eventually) and didn't have to pay for it.
I now exclude US Protectorates from all listings, and exclude HI/AK if the package has the chance of going slow shipping, such as media mail or ground shipping.
Sorry to hear of your trouble, smkcbk. I often worry about the same thing happening when I ship overseas. Fortunately, I've not had that exact issue (knock on wood) with any of my international buyers, (at least not yet!) 🙂
But I am confused by what you and dbmm-media have said.
Other posters are saying choosing to exclude certain locales is a global setting, yet your comment: "...and exclude HI/AK if the package has the chance of going slow shipping, such as media mail or ground shipping." makes it sound like IT IS possible to exclude undesired shipping locations on a "as appropriate" basis.
If so, if you don't mind me asking, how are you doing that?
07-27-2016 03:49 PM
@uncseniorsportsfan wrote:As a seller I would never use media mail for tapes or CDs if the are light enough to go first class mail. Nor would I ever send anything media mail or standard mail to Alaska or Hawaii.
I also don't offer any buyer a choice of shipping method - I figure it's my job as a seller to know what the best means of shipment is for everything I sell.
uncseniorsportfan, as I explained farther down in the thread, the package was too heavy to go First Class.
Rest assured, after this little ordeal, I won't be sending any recordings or books outside of the lower 48 states via Media Mail in the future!
As far as giving a buyer the option on how fast they get their item, I find most people prefer to "get a deal" and think standard shipping just dandy rather than paying extra to "get it fast." So, unless there's essentially no cost savings to sending it "standard" or the item is of a high enough value where it would cost me more to add on insurance to say First Class or Media Mail than to go Priority from the get-go, my standard way of listing items is to use the most economical method available of which prsopectibe bidders/buyers are aware.
However, in the event a buyer would like to receive the item quicker, I have no problem with expediting the shipment if that's what they prefer. All they have to do is let me know and I will revise the shipping cost accordingly and let them decide. Has nothing to do with "not knowing/doing my job" -- but everything IMO to do with being responsive and meeting customer needs/desires.
You may view it differently, which is fine. I have no problem with the way you run your business. To each their own. as they say... 🙂
07-27-2016 03:53 PM
@newview wrote:I highly recommend you contact Consumerist with your story ...
tips@consumerist.com
They LOVE a story like this.
@newview wrote:I highly recommend you contact Consumerist with your story ...
tips@consumerist.com
They LOVE a story like this.
Good to know, newview. Thanks for the tip, though I've already spent far more time on this puppy than the eight bucks the item sold for so would rather just put it behind me, and move on. Thanks for your suggestion though and for taking the time to respond. Appreciate it!
07-27-2016 04:01 PM
@brad62853 wrote:@luckythewinner wrote:
What is a "late delivery defect"?
If you ship with tracking and the tracking is scanned within your handling time, I believe the transaction does not count against your on-time shipping metric, even if it is never delivered.
Unlucky
New on-time shipping metric
You'll be recognized for on-time shipping if tracking shows your item was either shipped within the stated handling time or delivered by the estimated delivery date. If there's no tracking available, we'll check with your buyer. If your buyer confirms the item was delivered on time—you'll be recognized for on-time shipping.
Shipments will be considered late only when:
- Tracking shows item was delivered after the estimated delivery date and there's no acceptance scan within your handling time or there's no confirmation from the buyer of on-time delivery, or
- Buyer confirms item was delivered after the estimated delivery date and there's no acceptance scan within your handling time or there's no delivery confirmation by the estimated delivery date
This is part of what drove all our discussions earlier in the year about USPS acceptance scans and how so many people were reporting that their PO and/or tracking weren't showing these. Hence eBay resorts to THEIR "estimated delivery dates" which we know are about as reliable as their CS reps having English as their first language.
unluckytheloser, I'm sure dbmm-media can speak to his situationmore authoratively, but I believe what was also a factor in my case was the silly "delivery date estimate" that eBay arbitrarily slaps on listings.
The CS Rep told me they knew the package was sent Media Mail and they also know it often takes weeks for an item to get from the Mainland over to Hawaii when shipping via Media Mail.
However, EBAY decided it should only take FIVE DAYS for the package to reach the buyer and that's what THEY promised her. So, when it didn't arrive within that timeframe, she was within her rights to complain, and I was the one left hanging.
Clearly, the current system/philosophy eBay is using is flawed when it comes to the delivery date issue, but I sensed no interest on the part of the CS Rep to even acknowledge the problem, let alone address it...
07-27-2016 04:02 PM
@smick55 wrote:Actually, none of that story was a surprise. I'm guessing you also received an unresolved by seller case on your record, which is the worst part of all in my opinion.
When I first started selling I sold an item that went ground shipping to Hawaii. I quickly learned to never ever do that. Whatever it takes, find a way to ship with an air mail method even it costs more to avoid this issue.
Yep, yep and yep smick55. We all learn the hard way.... 🙂