cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

The new format is incredibly needy and tedious

It is taking me 4 times longer than it used to create a listing.  What have you done?? 

1. If you are going to require certain item specifics, have them readily available to be filled in so I don't have to go back and add them once the listing is done.

2. Why is the format taking so long to do anything?  I could just fill things in before, now I have to wait for every separate section to load before I can move on.

3. Editing photos is worse than ever.

4. The USPS doesn't care what size a first class package is.  Why do I have to enter the size?

5. Why do I need a UPC code for an item listed as new?  I have many vintage items that are "new unused" that do not have UPC codes! 

 

This new format is AWFUL 

Message 1 of 4
latest reply
3 REPLIES 3

The new format is incredibly needy and tedious

I have a headache.

 

1.  You are supposed to know those answers and have them ready.

 

2.  Because they made a stupid mistake and did not ask sellers for their opinions-my opinion.  Ask what year it's from four times and I'm going to get angry.

 

3.  I do all that before hand, so I have no answer.

 

4.  So they can use pricing based on size or weight and charge you the most money possible.

 

5.  Only enter a UPC code if your item has one.  Easy.

 

The new format is here to stay, whether it's good, bad, or stupid.

 

 

 

Good Moms let you lick the Beaters.

Great Moms turn them off first.
Message 2 of 4
latest reply

The new format is incredibly needy and tedious

USPS absolutely cares about first class packages over 22" long.   

Message 3 of 4
latest reply

The new format is incredibly needy and tedious

Yes, I agree. I only used the new format once to edit a Template and it took me 30 minutes to make 5 changes. The new format is a nightmare on slow DSL connection when everything is click here and poke there and open this and close that. I miss Turbo Lister!

Message 4 of 4
latest reply