cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Inkless Thermal shipping label printer

Hey, so I’m wondering if it would be smart to buy one of these inkless thermal shipping label printers for $50 and get 1000 sticker labels for $20. I think I’d save money by not using tape for the labels and not replacing ink on the printer. What do you guys think? 

Message 1 of 8
latest reply
7 REPLIES 7

Inkless Thermal shipping label printer

If you use it enough it is a good way to go.  The print is not damaged by eater like ink jet printing is.  Even better, it does not dry out if not used often so it's always ready to use.

Message 2 of 8
latest reply

Inkless Thermal shipping label printer

Best thing we ever bought for our E-bay business ! But wow didn't know they are only $50 now ?

 

Message 3 of 8
latest reply

Inkless Thermal shipping label printer


@murky36 wrote:

Hey, so I’m wondering if it would be smart to buy one of these inkless thermal shipping label printers for $50 and get 1000 sticker labels for $20. I think I’d save money by not using tape for the labels and not replacing ink on the printer. What do you guys think? 


Totally worth it. Long ago I bought used ones, usually from a bank or business closing. I'm sure those things were run to the ground before I bought them but they were a fraction of the cost of a new one at hundreds of dollars iirc. They were difficult to understand to initially set up and were sometimes temperamental. I saved a lot in ink and paper, I actually also use it to print packing slips.

Since then I found it practical to buy brand new ones so they are more reliable. I forgot what I paid for them but it sounds like the ones you see are $50, that's totally worth investing if you ask me.

Message 4 of 8
latest reply

Inkless Thermal shipping label printer

I bought a Rollo recently, got it refurbished from the manufacturer. Works like a charm. Typically these go over $200 and I got it for $150. I feel like it was quality while economical (I don't want a $80-$100 one to fail on me, or a $700 one to break the bank). 

 

Also got my labels super cheap, got (if I recall correctly) 3,000 for $25. 

 

I literally did the math, the paper and tape i was using cost like 3x more than a single label at the price I bought them (but I got them super cheap)... That doesn't even factor in ink though...and I buy expired ink to be cheap and not pay $20-30+ per cartridge.....

Message 5 of 8
latest reply

Inkless Thermal shipping label printer

Anonymous
Not applicable

Yes, you should never use inkjet printers due to the cost of the ink. The ink may also run when exposed to water such as some rain drops or snow flakes. Larger amounts of water will also damage it, but then larger amounts of water will also damage the box its attached to as well as boxes with thermal or laser labels.

 

Thermal printers require special coated papers - you can't use cheap commonly found paper. Cheaper labels have had a history in the past of fading over time when exposed to sunlight over time due to them not having UV protection. These consumer level labels also typically do not have that strong of adhesive on the back and can be pealed off certain surfaces. You should test a sample of printed labels to see how well they stick on boxes, poly mailers and bubble mailers.

 

In some instances these labels can be pealed off at a package sorting facility. This happens when by chance a corner or edge of another package impacts the corner of a label and partially bends it up and exposes the adhesive underneath. Another package temporary attaches to this exposed adhesive and tugs on it a little more. This process may repeat until the label is completely removed from your package. There is more of a chance of this happening on poly mailer and bubble mailers as they can be more easily deformed. You might reinforce these labels with some clear tape.

 

The large thermal labels that were printed at two bulk goods warehouses I worked at on the other hand had industrial adhesive. They could only be scrapped off metal totes in pieces or torn off in small pieces from Gaylord style totes. They also had UV protection as they might sit in the warehouse for some time. The Zebra printers that produced these labels; however, cost over $2,000 and the labels cost a lot more than consumer level labels. These printers also came with 3-ring binder manual for feeding the rolls back through when they ran out as it was rather complicated process.

 

I am still using a monotone laser printer from 2001 to print labels. It has a separate drum and toner cartridge. I've only replaced the drum once and that was last year when I accidentally broke off a small part. The high capacity toner cartridges are changed every few years. Almost all the paper I use is leftover from larger lots of items I purchased at auction to it cost almost nothing. I am currently working on four tubs of plain notepad paper in various sizes from auction lots. If I ever get through that I have at least 40 reams of paper to use up. I also use other paper to print labels on such as some product inserts with printing on one side - I simply turn them over.

 

Monotone laser labels  printed on paper and taped to the box. Since you should be adding some tape to any label you apply as a precaution I thought I'd might as well stick with the plain paper labels. I also can print other documents on the laser printer as well as on various sizes of decals for internal use. I've yet to have a failed label in nearly 25 years.

Message 6 of 8
latest reply

Inkless Thermal shipping label printer

Cant imagine having to use tape to keep the thermal labels on the package. Is that not the whole time saving purpose of thermal? 

 

I bought a Epson ET3850 EcoTank that hardly uses any ink. Have not refilled since I bought it about 10 months ago with daily use.  Uses bottles of ink, not cartridges. 

Posting ID
Message 7 of 8
latest reply

Inkless Thermal shipping label printer

Well while we are talking supplies has anyone ever bought their own air pillow apparatus?  How long does it take to break even on that thing?

Message 8 of 8
latest reply