cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

eBay’s Unfair Protection: Ignoring Clear Evidence in High-Value Return Fraud

Recently, we sold a brand-new, high-value item worth approximately $5,000 to a buyer. The buyer used the item and then falsely claimed it was "not as described," returning it to us in completely unacceptable condition. Normally, we are reasonable with return cases as long as the item is in good enough condition for resale. However, this case was beyond anything we could tolerate.

 

The buyer returned a totally damaged item—the lens was missing, the entire device was covered in dirt, and even the control panel was seriously damaged. Given the high value of this item, we took extra precautions and recorded the entire shipping and return process. We have clear video evidence showing the item being packed, shipped, received, and unboxed. We were fully prepared to provide this evidence, confident that we had done everything necessary to protect ourselves.

 

But guess what happened?

After discovering the damage, we opened a case and immediately informed eBay that we had undeniable proof. However, they never provided clear instructions on how to submit our evidence. A few days later, without reviewing any evidence, eBay ruled in favor of the buyer—just because the buyer had "fulfilled their responsibility" by returning a package.

 

We escalated the issue and spoke with a representative from eBay’s so-called "High-Value Team." To our shock, we were told that photos and videos are not considered valid evidence to prove that the buyer returned a damaged item. Seriously? After a 30-minute conversation with eBay support, it became clear—buyers get 100% priority and protection, while sellers are completely defenseless.

 

If this logic stands, what’s stopping a buyer from returning an empty box or a completely different item? The answer is nothing. eBay will still side with the buyer because, apparently, even with solid proof, sellers have no way to defend themselves.

 

This is an outrageous failure of seller protection. eBay needs to fix this broken system immediately.

Message 1 of 7
latest reply
6 REPLIES 6

eBay’s Unfair Protection: Ignoring Clear Evidence in High-Value Return Fraud

I would take that buyer to court with such a high price item.  Can't let buyers take advantage.  

Message 2 of 7
latest reply

eBay’s Unfair Protection: Ignoring Clear Evidence in High-Value Return Fraud


@noahork wrote:

 

If this logic stands, what’s stopping a buyer from returning an empty box or a completely different item? The answer is nothing.


 

Right.

Buyer could send back an empty box and get a refund.

 

If you offered 30 day free returns, you could deduct up to 50% off the refund.

 

Have a great day.
Message 3 of 7
latest reply

eBay’s Unfair Protection: Ignoring Clear Evidence in High-Value Return Fraud

You have no recourse on ebay.

Before you list something for sale on ebay, remember, ANYONE can rip you off simply by filing a false claim through ebay.

I would never sell anything on ebay for more than a few hundred dollars let alone $5,000.

Good luck.

Message 4 of 7
latest reply

eBay’s Unfair Protection: Ignoring Clear Evidence in High-Value Return Fraud

Videos mean nothing - they can be faked and mocked up too easily and so are not admissible evidence in these cases. I'm sorry this happened - anything expensive I sell in person.


“The illegal we do immediately, the unconstitutional takes a little longer.” - Henry Kissinger

"Wherever law ends, tyranny begins" -John Locke
Message 5 of 7
latest reply

eBay’s Unfair Protection: Ignoring Clear Evidence in High-Value Return Fraud

Its one of the reason I dont sell high priced items on Etsy, Amazon and wont here either.(just started listing anything here again)

 

One of the reasons I pulled my products from Amazon, high cancelations, high return rate and sent beck completely damaged and always in favor of the buyer.

“You can spend your life building someone else’s dream or you can build your own.” -Jess Levin Carats & Cake
Message 6 of 7
latest reply

eBay’s Unfair Protection: Ignoring Clear Evidence in High-Value Return Fraud

@noahork 

Actually, contrary to the post by @inhawaii  you may have recourse on eBay depending on WHERE you shipped this item.  Perhaps Delaware, Oregon, S.Florida/Miami Dade, New York?  If it was an address of a Freight Forwarder you do have recourse.   It is best to act on this PRIOR to having to send a return label, but do Google the address and let us know. 

Other than than that a buyer can claim anything they want.  It doesn't matter if it is true. THE ONLY THING THAT COUNTS is what reason they chose for the return....UNLESS they used a freight forwarder.  

Message 7 of 7
latest reply