cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

I am saying this as a seller and a buyer  of almost TEN years but: who in the world thought it be a good idea to use Gen(generative) ai images instead of basic photos to list their physical items?

 

…besides a scammer?

 

Those willfully doing it, What made them think a computer generation would beat out a quick pick on the phone? It’s worse than redundant. It will never be as accurate or as fast as just showing the actual thing. Gen ai is a statistical algorithm that got marketed as “artificial intelligence.”. A parrot program to some computer scientists. ( To preface this, I am not anti-tech, quite the opposite! I went to school for it. My knowledge of tech is why I have a searing hatred for generative ai SPECIFICALLY.) Gen ai  is the latest marketing craze and is being shoved into everything just so investors can break even. As we have seen in the last three years, especially with eBay’s latest attempts to “integrate” it here. Absolute useless features (especially to me) when you go past the shiny paint and empty promises. But fantastic scamware to all the wrong people.  Woe to those who fall for it, as many already have. 

 

I’ll make an example of why using ai images to advertise physical items is false advertising : Etsy.
God, ai image listings are real bad on Etsy, ridiculously so. I am tired of looking for patterns and plushies and seeing ai images that look NOTHING like the actual end result product- bonus points if the pattern is ai generated too!  😞  

 

And a bunch of them have never crochet before , let alone looked at a pattern, so more often than not they are selling people GIBBERISH. Oh yeah, ai stuff can’t be physically sold- because it’s of things that don’t exist. And if they DO write their own patterns and they HAVE tested their patterns and know what the item is supposed to look like- then they shouldn’t  use ai images to advertise! they’re literally selling themselves short. 

I knew I’d rue the day Etsy got the bright idea to integrate/allow ai on it’s platform.

 

It’s one thing to not control it, spammers are gonna spam. but Etsy ENCOURAGED it, despite it being counter-intuitive to everything they stand for. Then again , drop shippers managed to get on here so I am not entirely surprised we have another level of SCAMMING there. I have a trained eye, I can often (not always) tell if an image is ai. But not every one can , and that’s my greatest concern. Scammers rely on deceit, and thats all this tech will ever be to me. Deceiving. So I cannot stress enough how much of a bad idea it is to adversity anything with Gen ai imagery. Customers are already getting JIPPED.  

 

So if it’s super bad there, imagine how bad it could be here on EBay ? (They probably have fake crochet patterns and stuff here as we speak.) I am already seeing a post or two about how years old eBay posts are randomly getting ai pics on their listing. I hate eBay’s push into ai, its cumbersome, useless , redundant “tools” that most if any of us never asked for. ( I wanted to do store sales without a subscription but noooo, i get stuck with “use ai to write descriptions” instead!)  And what sucks most is that we can’t turn it off, we have no control on who’s forced to use these “tools” and who isn’t. I just want to sell stuff I made, I don’t want to be a guinea pig for this trash tech. (And yet it’s costing me regardless of if I use it, go figure.) I can write, I can read, I can think for myself. I don’t need an ai to write a description for MY product that I made by hand. and I certainly don’t need to deceive my customers with an ai pic that looks little like the work I am selling. As I said, false advertisement. 

 

You ever buy something and it not look as advertised? You get This sick feeling in the pit of your stomach, your heart sinks, you fee used. Yeah, I don’t want that for my buyers and I am disgusted by sellers who PURPOSEFULLY do that to their customers. I see folks willfully using ai images for their products to be no better. 

 

I take seller integrity VERY importantly. An undoctored photo is the most honest we can be online. just take a photo like we’ve been doing. 

Message 1 of 51
latest reply
50 REPLIES 50

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

We had the TV-addicted, though. I knew kids who could barely function away from their TVs. Their entire household was like that.


“The illegal we do immediately, the unconstitutional takes a little longer.” - Henry Kissinger

"Wherever law ends, tyranny begins" -John Locke
Message 16 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising


@mystic.j.crafts wrote:

Im starting to notice that a lot of things have shifted away from “positive customer experience” and shifted more towards “satisfying shareholders.” 


With ONE exception.

If the postman is lax in delivering your packages, it is considered a major sin, and unless you can retrain your mailman ... you will be punished for not providing a satisfactory buyer experience.  

 

 

 

 

 

Message 17 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising


@chapeau-noir wrote:

We had the TV-addicted, though. I knew kids who could barely function away from their TVs. Their entire household was like that.


Very true.  

 

But at least the whole family was together, in the same room, becoming debilitated by the same thing.  😁

eBay seller since 1999. This is a posting ID.
Message 18 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

   Years I once knew a disfunctional family like that. I once showed up at the front door knocked and it was ajar. I hollered and no one answered. All the lights in the house were on. They knew me well and since it was so noisy (TV's) I went in and there was a TV in every single room I could see into without opening a door. I didn't look into the master bedroom or bath but every single room including the other two bathrooms had the lights on and TV's running.

   No one was home. Front door ajar and all the lights and TV's on..........wow.

   Even the kitchen and dining room...........

Message 19 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising


@roccotacodad54 wrote:

   Years I once knew a disfunctional family like that. I once showed up at the front door knocked and it was ajar. I hollered and no one answered. All the lights in the house were on. They knew me well and since it was so noisy (TV's) I went in and there was a TV in every single room I could see into without opening a door. I didn't look into the master bedroom or bath but every single room including the other two bathrooms had the lights on and TV's running.

   No one was home. Front door ajar and all the lights and TV's on..........wow.

   Even the kitchen and dining room...........


Wow I guess electricity was cheaper then... 

I have a funny story  somewhat similar.. Video games became a huge addiction too & it persists.

 

When my son was about five, he had a neighborhood friend that had a huge addiction to one of his video games. Apparently the boy didn't have it at home.

Anyway, we had some woods & a field nearby where we took our son to ride his lil mini dirtbike..

One afternoon we came home from about an hour of that and found that little boy in our house!

Yep, sitting there playing my son's video game. 

We locked the door after that. 

 

~Pika~
People in life that are the happiest don't have the most,, they make the most of what they have...

Message 20 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

   Lock the door indeed.

   I don't remember the price of electricity but that whole family had money and tended towards excess. Maybe that's why all the children (my friends from school) ended up successful. They had to be to support their excesses? 

   I never minded their eccentric life style though. Comps to all the boxing matches, comped rooms in strip hotels, drinks, meals, concerts..........Handy to have eccentric friends when visiting relatives in Las Vegas even to this day.

   Good people just wierd................

Message 21 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

I feel like the CEO’s all drank the AI kool-aid, spent millions, and it is not working out.

AI cannot read photos and describe them accurately, messing up alt text for the vision impaired and confusing search engines, any human reading AI generated descriptions recognizes instantly what it is and is turned off, and, when business people use AI/ Chat for writing instead of using their own intellect to compose, their co-workers assume they aren’t smart enough/ really don’t know what they are doing.

 

My .02 cents

Message 22 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising


@mystic.j.crafts wrote:

 

Oh, i was silly enough to order a $28 dollar “pandora” bracelet that turned copper a week later off here and PayPal and eBay kept doing aback and forth before deciding that I couldn’t get my money back. I thought it was a reseller… turned out to be a ripoff. 


Did you just skip starting a return and go straight to a chargeback? 

Message 23 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising


@mystic.j.crafts wrote:

…besides a scammer?


A scammer doesn't need to use AI photos.

A seller can show a picture of a Lamborghini insead of the Kia he's selling.

Bottom line is, if the buyer is not happy and files a INAD, the seller WILL be refunding.

 

Quincy Theme Song - Glen A. Lasrson & Stu Phillips
Message 24 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

I tried to return it, Seller had “no returns”. Then I messaged the seller, got nowhere. and when i went to eBay about it, they did nothing but send me to PayPal. 

Message 25 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

I know. they still use em, tho. My point is regardless, it should be seen false advertising in general.  

Message 26 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

I think the 2 cents makes sense. A lot of companies have been pushing this which means a lot of them poured money into this money sink and are praying for a return. They don’t even now where to apply it so they slap it anywhere and everywhere they can. The constant commercials, the pushing for updates , ect.  And it’s sad, it’s such a huge indicator of “less”. You know.  Cheapening, less intelligent, ect.  They should really stop using this stuff around legal documents and buisness workings , it’s sure to cause a potential lawsuit . 

Message 27 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising


@mystic.j.crafts wrote:

I tried to return it, Seller had “no returns”. Then I messaged the seller, got nowhere. and when i went to eBay about it, they did nothing but send me to PayPal. 


There is no such thing as "no returns".

All buyers are covered by ebay's MBG (money back guarantee).

You CAN return it for a full refund if you file a "not as described" return with ebay.

The seller will even have to pay for return shipping.

Quincy Theme Song - Glen A. Lasrson & Stu Phillips
Message 28 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

Which product?

 

Is it a product with multiple qty?

 

Its not easy making AI accurate items without skills and knowledge of art and good use of prompts.

Message 29 of 51
latest reply

Re: Using ai images for physical items is basically false advertising

yeah, I read that two years ago when this happened and somehow I still got the run around and lost 28 bucks.  I know what the garuntee said, I followed the directions, I try to be careful with my online purchases: I still got JIPPED. Stuff happens sometimes. No amount of rationalizing can undo the bull that happend to me. 

Message 30 of 51
latest reply