07-11-2017 02:53 PM
I found some old cinematographer magazines and will sell them, but they all have the address label of the subscriber. I looked him up out of curiousity (not many people in cinemaphotography) and he was involved in a historical event - having filmed some of it. He has since passed away (last year). Should I mention this in the auction? is it ethical? should I remove the labels? comments/thoughts please.
Solved! Go to Best Answer
07-11-2017 03:21 PM
07-11-2017 03:02 PM
Was he famous ?
What was the event ?
As the guy has passed, I would think it would be safe to name him here.
07-11-2017 03:14 PM
magazine labels are difficult to remove without damaging the magazine. Leave them
As far as the subscriber I don't think it would make a difference so I wouldn't mention it.
JMO
07-11-2017 03:21 PM
07-11-2017 03:26 PM
OK..thanks for your comments. I will leave the labels intact, but leave it to the buyer to figure out who the subscriber is. Here's what I found on him: (subscriber) was a cameraman for WDSU-TV in New Orleans and filmed Lee Harvey Oswald distributing pro-Castro leaflets in front of the International Trade Mart.
07-11-2017 03:26 PM
07-11-2017 03:34 PM
I have been researching Lee for over 20 years.
I would think putting in the reference to Lee passing out the leaflets.
And the guy's name, and TV station, would get you more hits.
07-11-2017 04:00 PM
@scubasteve1991 wrote:OK..thanks for your comments. I will leave the labels intact, but leave it to the buyer to figure out who the subscriber is. Here's what I found on him: (subscriber) was a cameraman for WDSU-TV in New Orleans and filmed Lee Harvey Oswald distributing pro-Castro leaflets in front of the International Trade Mart.
The more words in your description and searchable words in the title the better to get views. (but) I can't imagine anyone wanting a magazine owned by someone who took a picture of Oswald but it can't hurt.
07-11-2017 04:35 PM