cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Damaged items - to list or not to list?

I purchased a group of vintage belt buckles and has posted most of them for sale.  I have two that I'm concerned about.  One of them is a vintage pewter "Soccer Ball" Budwiser belt buckle.  In great condition they sell for about $35.  Mine is in well-used condition and a piece of the hook on the back that slips into the hole on the belt is broken off.  I would say about 1/4".   Should I post this for $15 OBO with the damage clearly described and photographed or should I take it to my local flea market?

 

The other one is a fairly large (3" X 2" or a little larger) buckle with the part that the belt goes through fairly heavily damaged.  As a display piece it's great, with a mosaic eagle in the middle.  Again, should I post it for a BIN/OBO price or send it to the flea market?

 

I just want your opinions.  Right now I'm leaning toward the flear market but would like to hear what the experience sellers on the board have to say.

 

Thanks.

 

Message 1 of 23
latest reply
22 REPLIES 22

Re: Damaged items - to list or not to list?

Take good photos of any damage and be sure to list any damage in your description.

I've sold broken and damaged items and never had any problems or complaints, yet.

Have A Great Day.
Message 16 of 23
latest reply

Re: Damaged items - to list or not to list?

Everyone forgets that the founder of eBay, Pierre Omidyar, started eBay by first selling a broken laser pointer.  He even asked the buyer if he read that it was broken, and the buyer said yes!

 

I don't think everyone has forgotten.  Many do remember, but also realize that not only has eBay changed in that time, but the world has changed.

 

There are current eBay members who were not born yet when Omidyar sold his broken laser pointer.

Message 17 of 23
latest reply

Re: Damaged items - to list or not to list?


wrote:

Everyone forgets that the founder of eBay, Pierre Omidyar, started eBay by first selling a broken laser pointer.  He even asked the buyer if he read that it was broken, and the buyer said yes!

 

I don't think everyone has forgotten.  Many do remember, but also realize that not only has eBay changed in that time, but the world has changed.

 

There are current eBay members who were not born yet when Omidyar sold his broken laser pointer.


"You'll always miss 100% of the shots you don't take." - Wayne Gretzky
Message 18 of 23
latest reply

Re: Damaged items - to list or not to list?

This tube was damaged, but the damage had absolutley no bearing on the performance of the tube.  I'll take as many damaged ones as I can get.

Message 19 of 23
latest reply

Re: Damaged items - to list or not to list?

Damage depends on the category. I sold a dozen damaged Wee Forest Folk mouse sculptures with no problem. One person's chipped ear is another's "get the brown marker out and cover the white spot".

______________________________________________

They didn’t say it was your fault. They said they blame you.
Message 20 of 23
latest reply

Re: Damaged items - to list or not to list?

I agree it depends on the category.

 

I sell a lot of photography items; they will sell if damaged. They'll sell if non working. For one thing most photography items are repairable and a lot of problems can be gotten around. A lens with a big scratch on the front glass is still perfectly usable if you don't use it in dim lighting, because you're not using the damaged part of the glass.

 

However I would never sell a used computer. There's a 100 million transistors, if one doesn't work its junque. And the attirude of the people who buy is not up to what I'd deal with.

 

Attitude is the big determinator in any category.

 

If I sold the buckles I would make sure any looker knew it was damaged and how. I would list it as an auction and start it at $1 and  state that it's worth a dollar. If you bid higher thats your decision.

 

Message 21 of 23
latest reply

Re: Damaged items - to list or not to list?

If I sold the buckles I would make sure any looker knew it was damaged and how. I would list it as an auction and start it at $1 and state that it's worth a dollar. If you bid higher that's your decision.


I would do that as long as the listing makes it crystal-clear that the belt buckle cannot in fact be used as a belt buckle, since the hook is broken off. That is, I don't think it's repairable without some considerable metal reworking on the back.

 

My own preference is that I list damaged or less-than-perfect items all the time, but only if they can be used as-is despite whatever issue(s) are present, which I don't think is the case here. If you think it's worth the risk, payoff-wise, then proceed carefully.

Message 22 of 23
latest reply

Re: Damaged items - to list or not to list?

If all the damage is on the back and the front side is still in displayable condition, I'd say go ahead and list them.  Brewery memorabilia is pretty collectible, plus it's the sort of thing that someone might want to buy as a decoration for a man cave or something like that.

 

I disagree that damaged items are an SNAD waiting to happen-- I've sold a bunch of things that were damaged (I've bought some, too) and I haven't had a problem yet.  Just make sure you clearly photograph and describe any flaws and you should be good to go.

Message 23 of 23
latest reply