08-11-2017 10:44 PM - edited 08-11-2017 10:45 PM
Lol, I've seen sellers acknowledge this rule thru the decades, but always manage to justify that their "particular books" are exempt from this rule. As said, some ruin it for many.
08-12-2017 12:05 PM
Media Mail Service Media Mail® service has special eligibility requirements for permissible contents. Media Mail rates are limited to the items listed below:
Books (at least 8 pages).
Sound recordings and video recordings, such as CDs and DVDs.
Playscripts and manuscripts for books, periodicals, and music.
Printed music.
Computer-readable media containing prerecorded information and guides or scripts prepared solely for use with such media.
Sixteen millimeter or narrower width films.
Printed objective test materials and their accessories.
Printed educational reference charts.
Loose-leaf pages and their binders consisting of medical information for distribution to doctors, hospitals, medical schools, and medical students.
Media Mail Packages may not contain advertising except that books may contain incidental announcements of other books and sound recordings may contain incidental announcements of other sound recordings. In accordance...
seems if you have to fit your item in a grey area, then it probably isn't media mail... and if those use it ...and hope,...then if caught then no one to blame but themself...
and the speed of it--what a pain ....give me 1st class or flate rate envelope or box anytime.
08-12-2017 12:14 PM
You'd be better off shipping those Priority Mail.
08-12-2017 12:20 PM
There are tons of comic book sellers on Ebay who ship MM. I'm not one of them. If for some reason the package is damaged and a postal employee sees it, or is randomly inspected (they DO inspect them, it's happened to me), the buyer has to pay the extra postage to get their item. Not good.
The USPS is getting ready to raise it's rates again, and I think it's the perfect time for them to reevaluate their MM policies. Any magazines, comics, books, whatever, that are over two years old should qualify for MM, IMO.
08-12-2017 12:31 PM
And then there are the violators that use a technicality to game the system..
I bought a box- (yeah ok it was designer box, a BIG one, don't shame me).
It was reboxed (as it should be) and seller put a homemade mix tape inside the inner box-
They shipped the whole lot media mail...
Technically, they were within the rules but it was still shady to me.
I can't compete with that. They paid appx 4.00+change. For me to ship that box would cost $14.+
08-12-2017 12:39 PM
Wow... Kinda funny, kinda NOT funny. 🙂
08-12-2017 12:40 PM
@stonevintage wrote:Lol, I've seen sellers acknowledge this rule thru the decades, but always manage to justify that their "particular books" are exempt from this rule. As said, some ruin it for many.
All the books I've sold never had any ads in them. Although there are books that have certain "ads" in them. Some publishers have other books for sale and will list their website or mail order address.
Some sellers simply ignore them and ship MM anyway.
08-12-2017 12:49 PM
I think what constitutes an "ad" is at the discretion of whoever is inspecting the item. Some postal people are picky and some are lenient. There are published guidelines but real life is more fluid...
My local postal guys are pretty casual but you never know if some inspector along the way has had a bad day
Good luck~
08-12-2017 01:08 PM
@pikabo-icu wrote:And then there are the violators that use a technicality to game the system..
I bought a box- (yeah ok it was designer box, a BIG one, don't shame me).
It was reboxed (as it should be) and seller put a homemade mix tape inside the inner box-
They shipped the whole lot media mail...
Technically, they were within the rules but it was still shady to me.
I can't compete with that. They paid appx 4.00+change. For me to ship that box would cost $14.+
A lot like the seller who shipped 2 large rolls of bubble with a book sandwiched between them as MM. The postal carrier who inspected it commented it must have been a VERY expensive book.
08-12-2017 02:20 PM
Frankly, I don't offer MM as a shipping option even if the item does qualify for it, owing to the unpredictability of the transit time. I suppose if I were a regular book seller I might think differently about it, but I don't think the savings is worth grief received from impatient buyers.
08-12-2017 03:04 PM
08-12-2017 04:32 PM
I have been collecting vintage yearbooks since 2001 and the sellers always ship them media mail. One seller said vintage advertisements do not count so you can ship yearbooks that way. It appears that isn't true.
08-12-2017 05:45 PM
1786davycrockett wrote: ... does ONE advertisement inside a 40 year old mass market paperback change it from a book, into a periodical? I don't think so.
Advertising doesn't change anything into a periodical. Being published periodically, and shipped at the USPS Periodical rate, does.
08-12-2017 05:52 PM
@partial*eclipse wrote:The listing for poppy's catalog says, "Measures 13.25" to 9.25". 600 pages." So it's too big for a FRE.
Yep. The only one it would fit in was the med flat rectangle size. I always offer parcel select and priority. And I use A &B boxes whenever possible. Most people selling catalogs offer Media Mail on their listings but I'm not going to do it.
That's the whole thing . My west coast customers (who are left) get penalized for shipping as do I. That price spread is totally ridiculous.
08-12-2017 05:54 PM
@poppyswag wrote:Love this topic, Stone. Just had a dilemma of a 1928 catalog. Buyer from CA begged for shippng mercy. 17.00+ parcel select/priority - 4.00 media mail. What would you do?
I think we can use common sense in some situations. What advertising or even items for sale are still viable in that catalog, now, 89 years later ?
Although I think the book squeezed in the bubble wrap order was rather ingenious. Why don't I ever think to think creatively like that?
Signed,
Goody Two Shoes
08-12-2017 06:15 PM
Common sense has nothing to do with it. USPS has chosen to not allow advertising or periodicals of any age. Perhaps there's nothing relevant from a catalog from 1928, but where do you draw the line? 1958? 1988? 2008? The chart that they produced for their own staff addressed this clearly by having separate entries for "New magazines" and "old magazines":
https://liteblue.usps.gov/news/link/2013/04apr/Media-Mail-Guidelines.htm