03-21-2023 04:14 AM
eBay, you need to stop treating your most loyal long-term sellers with such blatant disrespect. ALL ITEMS SHOULD BE LISTED WITH THE SAME VIEWABILITY.
If items must be "promoted" by forcing sellers to give up what little profit margin they may have left in this runaway inflationary economy, you will soon have no sellers left except your favored fraudsters, cheats, scammers, drop shippers, etc.
Solved! Go to Best Answer
03-21-2023 09:20 PM
@theteamsetguy wrote:
I don’t know what your margins are? Perhaps you are paying too much for your inventory? Most collectibles dealers usually pay 50 to 60 percent of retail or less. This leaves plenty of margin for the dealer to make a profit.
I buy mainly from other dealers wanting to move excess or inventory they don’t want because they acquired it as part of a much larger purchase. These dealers sell me stuff generally for 30% or less of my sell prices.
Like the saying goes you make money when you buy not when you sell.
Wow not sure what help this is to people who have tight margins or cant find better sources...
But here... Lets put your theory to test that there is plenty of profit after ebay fees on an item you own for 50% of selling price...
Lets arbitrarily use a $50.00 item with a $12.00 shipping fee, 8% sales tax($4.96), and promoted at the recommended rate of 8%.
The FVF for this sale is based off the rate of 13.35% - so the FVF would be 9.04 +.30 Transaction fee = 9.34 + Promoted Listing fee of $5.35 = 14.69 Total Fees
For the sake of argument, we wont consider the idea that someone from another country bought this and you have to pay another 1.65% in fees. Or for that matter any other fees that might come into play like the 5% below standard fine, or that you purchased a listing enhancement, or that you had to pay an item listing fee, etc...
So out of the $25 profit you stood to make, you paid $14.69 in fees leaving you a net profit of $10.31...
Net profit does not account for Packing Materials, Gas and Vehicle wear and tear, Storage, Internet and Phone Service charges and device wear and tear, TAXES(about 20% of net net!), etc etc...
Net profit also does not account for YOUR TIME involved in all this, the ever-growing risk of lost, damaged or STOLEN items, and other variables...
So in this sale scenario, if you account for everything above, you'll be lucky to have made $5 for your 1hr of time with absolutely no guarantee the sale will stand...
And guess what, they WILL be asking for more VERY SOON...Happy selling everyone....
03-21-2023 09:38 PM
@my-cottage-books-and-antiques wrote:
"Our inventory is purchased from various different manufacturers, retailers, and 3rd party sources."
I acquire my inventory from "3rd party sources" and there is no ebay requirement that I disclose that, much less provide any details. You are not required by ebay to disclose your inventory sources, and neither is this seller.
Not sure the above is accurate - I see many posts where people are saying their money is on hold and they needed to provide invoices, or receipts to ebay to verify - Some of these same people who have supposedly provided valid information have been banned for what appears to be no reason according to what they have written - go back some pages and you'll be sure to find some of these situations... I'm sure its quite worrisome for people who have a good portion of their eggs in the ebay basket.
03-21-2023 09:41 PM
@evry1nositswindy wrote:I'm sure I will regret this, but here goes. I could care less if someone else resells my item for more money after they acquire it. I have made my money and moved on.
As for the name calling debacle, rock star, scout, thrill seeker, etc are NOT selling designations. They are arbitrary names for number of posts on the community. Many of us think they are stupid and childish monikers, but we can't change that. That is all they are, nothing more. They have nothing to do with how much you sell or what you sell.
For some reason there are some people who think using them for name calling is just a brilliant debating tactic but it's equally juvenile and just, well, wet. I wish the chat forum would just get rid of the blasted things, we're not in junior high and I'm not a "rockstar" - at least let's be real and give me "machine head".
And what on earth is 'thrill seeker'? I've never been able to figure that one out.
03-21-2023 10:47 PM
@chapeau-noir wrote:
@evry1nositswindy wrote:I'm sure I will regret this, but here goes. I could care less if someone else resells my item for more money after they acquire it. I have made my money and moved on.
As for the name calling debacle, rock star, scout, thrill seeker, etc are NOT selling designations. They are arbitrary names for number of posts on the community. Many of us think they are stupid and childish monikers, but we can't change that. That is all they are, nothing more. They have nothing to do with how much you sell or what you sell.
For some reason there are some people who think using them for name calling is just a brilliant debating tactic but it's equally juvenile and just, well, wet. I wish the chat forum would just get rid of the blasted things, we're not in junior high and I'm not a "rockstar" - at least let's be real and give me "machine head".
And what on earth is 'thrill seeker'? I've never been able to figure that one out.
@chapeau-noir Speak for yourself, I *AM* a Rockstar 😃 Or at least, I've always wanted to be one & this is the closest I'll ever get, since I can't sing a note 🤣 BTW, I too, am still trying to figure out what the title has to do with the thread.
03-22-2023 08:06 AM
@isaiah53-57 This was a long, convoluted thread , and you might no have understood exactly what I was responding to. My statement is accurate. The OP was complaining because a particular seller did not provide his source in the listing. That is what I was responding to---that there is NO requirement to provide the source of inventory (either in a general statement, or a specific statement) in the listing. So, there is no rule violation if a seller does not include that information in the listing.
You statement---that ebay sometimes requires receipts or other proof of purchase is also accurate, but your statement has nothing to do with what must be provided in the Listing. I am required, for example, to include a return policy. But I am NOT required to divulge my source. (There might be exceptions in the Authenticated Focus categories, I don't know, as I don't sell in those categories) But for sellers outside those categories, there is no such requirement.
03-22-2023 08:42 AM
@chapeau-noir "And what on earth is 'thrill seeker'?"
I tried to find the page with the requirements for the various badges, but apparently it has been "archived" I did find this, however----
"They started life as good Scouts, doing their best and following all the rules, leading exemplary lives , avoiding all temptation. But some of them learned new rules fast, too fast, and soon, very soon, what they were learning wasn't on any report card! Hey Daddio!, the old rules were for "squares" , not for them! "Courtesy" went out the window, along with the empty beer cans and "reefer" butts , as they screamed down the Highway, seeking, always seeking, NEW THRILLS! But that Highway ,like all the thrill seeking girls, is nothing but dangerous curves--- and its ultimate destination--- the hopeless, nightmare world of the Rockstar!"
Hope that helps.
03-22-2023 10:02 AM - edited 03-22-2023 10:07 AM
@isaiah53-57 wrote:
@theteamsetguy wrote:
I don’t know what your margins are? Perhaps you are paying too much for your inventory? Most collectibles dealers usually pay 50 to 60 percent of retail or less. This leaves plenty of margin for the dealer to make a profit.
I buy mainly from other dealers wanting to move excess or inventory they don’t want because they acquired it as part of a much larger purchase. These dealers sell me stuff generally for 30% or less of my sell prices.
Like the saying goes you make money when you buy not when you sell.
Wow not sure what help this is to people who have tight margins or cant find better sources...
But here... Lets put your theory to test that there is plenty of profit after ebay fees on an item you own for 50% of selling price...
Lets arbitrarily use a $50.00 item with a $12.00 shipping fee, 8% sales tax($4.96), and promoted at the recommended rate of 8%.
The FVF for this sale is based off the rate of 13.35% - so the FVF would be 9.04 +.30 Transaction fee = 9.34 + Promoted Listing fee of $5.35 = 14.69 Total Fees
For the sake of argument, we wont consider the idea that someone from another country bought this and you have to pay another 1.65% in fees. Or for that matter any other fees that might come into play like the 5% below standard fine, or that you purchased a listing enhancement, or that you had to pay an item listing fee, etc...
So out of the $25 profit you stood to make, you paid $14.69 in fees leaving you a net profit of $10.31...
Net profit does not account for Packing Materials, Gas and Vehicle wear and tear, Storage, Internet and Phone Service charges and device wear and tear, TAXES(about 20% of net net!), etc etc...
Net profit also does not account for YOUR TIME involved in all this, the ever-growing risk of lost, damaged or STOLEN items, and other variables...
So in this sale scenario, if you account for everything above, you'll be lucky to have made $5 for your 1hr of time with absolutely no guarantee the sale will stand...
And guess what, they WILL be asking for more VERY SOON...Happy selling everyone....
For our margin we consider all the packing supplies/shipping fees/ads/etc, everything is taken in to account.
Real life numbers, as a seller who obtains parts directly from manufacturer, is that quite often we're making < $5 margin.
These are with the best possible prices you could get.
Which basically means anyone who's buying from a 3rd party, or getting jobber prices that are 50-60% less than retail, often can't even compete on eBay.
But this is also why the heavier focus on ad's hurts so much. Just 1% more of ads is a huge chunk of the bit of profit margin remaining. Considering our ad investment has more than doubled from what it was a few years back, our profits are far lower than they used to be. Not because of less sales - we can still compete for the sales since we have great pricing - but because of the piece of the pie eBay is getting becomes larger and larger.
This is why I have to dispute with those who say things like ads are optional or eBay hasn't increased fees. If you don't use ads, you go out of business, and if you don't pay those increased fees, good luck surviving on 10-20% of the income you get now (when the income we get now is already around like 60% of what it used to be).
As an experienced seller who is able see clearly see the climate of eBay throughout their changes, it's pretty sad to see that the popular opinion on here is often so far off from the truth, and even sadder that people don't believe the truth when sharing our real life experiences on here (rather than just presumption and hearsay).
With that said, on topic, I don't think "equal visibility" across the board is the answer on eBay. But there needs to be SOME way to compete with others. Right now, the only way to "compete" is to invest more in promotions, and this is unhealthy for both sellers and buyers, and does long term damage to the competitiveness and viability of the eBay marketplace.
There should be ways to compete that are fair, such as it used to be, where a strong sales history and actually taking care of your customers was rewarded. A way you could put in work and eBay takes care of you if you do your part and give customers a good positive experience.
03-22-2023 10:32 AM
@zamo-zuan You say: " If you don't use ads, you go out of business" and "it's pretty sad to see that the popular opinion on here is often so far off from the truth, and even sadder that people don't believe the truth when sharing our real life experiences on here (rather than just presumption and hearsay)."
I think the real problem....and the reason this Board is stuck in an endless loop on this topic...is that both views are correct.
If I say: "ebay does not require us to use PL", I am 100% correct, and you know it. There is NO requirement that I use PL. It is an option, just as there is no requirement that I offer Free Returns, for example.
If you say "" If I don't use ads, I'll go out of business", that may well be true...for you and SOME sellers. As a practical matter, some sellers NEED to use PLs to stay competitive. There is NO ebay requirement that they use them, but there is a practical need to use them. So, I get that, and I think most people here do get that.
But when you apply that to everyone, by saying "" If you don't use ads, you go out of business"....well, that goes too far. We aren't all in the same boat when it comes to PL. There ARE sellers who can do just fine without Pls. Maybe---I emphasize "maybe"--- they'd do even better with PLs, but it's their choice. And, as a practical matter, it IS a choice.
So, does ebay REQUIRE that we use PL? NO.
Do ALL sellers need to use it to survive? Again, NO.
Do SOME sellers, as a practical matter, need to use it to survive? YES.
03-22-2023 11:39 AM
@my-cottage-books-and-antiques wrote:@chapeau-noir "And what on earth is 'thrill seeker'?"
I tried to find the page with the requirements for the various badges, but apparently it has been "archived" .
eBay has never actually disclosed the specific ‘requirements’ for these exceedingly dumb rankings.
They apparently are top secret and not decipherable by comparing the stats of individual Community members.
I’ve seen a hierarchical list of the rankings … but not what it takes to move from one to another.
’Rockstar’ seems to be the one that receives the most ridicule. 🫤
03-22-2023 11:45 AM - edited 03-22-2023 11:46 AM
Wasn't it Andy Gibb that sang "Shadow Banning"?
If so, can we all agree Disco Star is different than Rock Star?
03-22-2023 11:47 AM
@house*of*paws Thanks for the info. My post was just in jest. Frankly, like many here, I have never really cared for, or about, the badges. But it was a big deal to whoever on the Community Team insisted we should have badges, and it's just not one of those things I've ever felt worth arguing with the Team about. They could remove them today and I wouldn't mind one bit.
If they sincerely want to increase community involvement on this Board, an ebay Higher Up needs to tell all the teams in no uncertain terms that questions sent them by the Community Team REQUIRE a prompt and full response. That would have a lot more impact than any badges.
03-22-2023 11:52 AM
I am currently doing some experiments that I believe will demonstrate to people, that overly high (double-digit) Promoted Listing percentages are a waste of money on many ordinary items.
Will report when done.
03-22-2023 12:03 PM
@my-cottage-books-and-antiques wrote:@house*of*paws Thanks for the info. My post was just in jest. Frankly, like many here, I have never really cared for, or about, the badges. But it was a big deal to whoever on the Community Team insisted we should have badges, and it's just not one of those things I've ever felt worth arguing with the Team about. They could remove them today and I wouldn't mind one bit.
If they sincerely want to increase community involvement on this Board, an ebay Higher Up needs to tell all the teams in no uncertain terms that questions sent them by the Community Team REQUIRE a prompt and full response. That would have a lot more impact than any badges.
I agree.
I’d also like if the Community Boards had 2 separate sections for ‘Q&A’s’ and ‘Discussions’ … as it once had. They would serve completely different purposes …. and save members the time of having to read through a thread of this length when they were looking for the answer to a specific question.
03-22-2023 12:09 PM
If/when an item is denied forwarding to a country, and only of using an eBay export service (through the eBay forwarding center), eBay lets seller keep the sale funds, and then sells rejected items to a reseller.
Would you rather get back the item? Seems to me that most would be happy with this arrangement.
03-22-2023 12:23 PM
@my-cottage-books-and-antiques wrote:@house*of*paws Thanks for the info. My post was just in jest. Frankly, like many here, I have never really cared for, or about, the badges. But it was a big deal to whoever on the Community Team insisted we should have badges, and it's just not one of those things I've ever felt worth arguing with the Team about. They could remove them today and I wouldn't mind one bit.
Various badges are just a generic part of a lot of bolt-on chat boards like this one - they're not exclusive to eBay.