cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Listing Form- comparing .com and .ca

This is a continuation of a discussion @lotzofuniquegoodies and I started on another thread.

https://community.ebay.com/t5/Selling/Fall-Seller-Update-coming-tomorrow/m-p/32262042#M1832622

 

The .com listing form clearly shows you which IS are required, recommended, or additional. These are screenshots of the advanced/business form as promised. How does the .ca form differ, Lotzofuniquegoodies?

 

listing1.pnglisting2.pnglisting3.pnglisting4.png

Message 1 of 2
latest reply
1 REPLY 1

Listing Form- comparing .com and .ca


@coffeebean832 wrote:

This is a continuation of a discussion @lotzofuniquegoodies and I started on another thread.

https://community.ebay.com/t5/Selling/Fall-Seller-Update-coming-tomorrow/m-p/32262042#M1832622

 

The .com listing form clearly shows you which IS are required, recommended, or additional. These are screenshots of the advanced/business form as promised. How does the .ca form differ, Lotzofuniquegoodies?

 

listing1.pnglisting2.pnglisting3.pnglisting4.png


Thanks again for posting. Appreciated. Unfortunately much of the problems happen when required is unknown or unavailable. This is very common for sellers selling OOAK, antique or out of package items. It tends to lead to sellers guessing and then risking a NAD for an unlucky guess. N/A is not always an option. Year of manufacture is a good example. And EXTREMELY messy for anyone trying to list a lot or "Lotz" of items.

 

That wonderful checkbox does not display within the listing. Only from the tool. So there is no way around a minimum of 2 passes per listing.

 

-Lotz

Message 2 of 2
latest reply