cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Forced to use Paypal

I have had an on-going dispute with a buyer who says he sent a cashier's check to pay for an item. I'm usually a patient man, but this guy has had 26 days to get me a check. I keep watching my mailbox, but nothing comes. I know that the mail is slow, but 26 days for a letter sized envelope? Please! So I relisted the item and filed a dispute. Hopefully I will get my fees back. It's not much, but anything helps. Now I am going to piss off a lot of people, but I will no longer take checks. Just Paypal and I state that in my listing. I also require immediate payment for a BIN and will only wait 7 days for a regular Paypal payment. I hate to do this, but I have had enough with non-paying bidders. This guy will get a NEG too. SmileyCentral.com -- Edited by ginzokid at 03/16/2008 6:45 AM PDT
Message 1 of 19
latest reply
18 REPLIES 18

Re: Forced to use Paypal

I like to use Paypal too. I feel a little more comfortable using Paypal with places I have not dealt with before. Charles
Message 16 of 19
latest reply

Re: Forced to use Paypal

This was just posted in the leaders group: EBAY’S PAYPAL RULE IN AUSTRALIA "EBay, Inc. is exploring whether to require customers to use its online payment service PayPal, a move that has angered users and prompted anti-trust scrutiny in Australia, where a PayPal-only rule takes effect next month. After repeated queries, the online auction company said late Friday it will not institute such a rule in the United States. But it remains unclear whether eBay will still try it in other countries. EBay often tests big changes in smaller markets before expanding them worldwide, and says it is open to that in this case. EBAY says it wants to reduce disputes and restore trust in its marketplace with the PayPal-only plan. Because eBay and PayPal can share information on each transaction, eBay says use of PayPal allows it to stop fraud more efficiently than outside payment services. Pressing that safety argument in a heated discussion with Australian users, an eBay executive compared the new rule to banning the sale of heroin on street corners. But critics lament that PayPal is costlier than other payment options, and they suspect eBay is just interested in increasing PayPal’s revenue. Australian banks say the plan will eliminate competition for the sake of exaggerated benefits. “Competition will be restricted, innovation and development will be constrained, new entry will be discouraged, and PayPal will be able to increase fees and charges to eBay users.” the Australian Bankers Association said in a filing with regulators on Thursday. Because eBay sellers are commonly independent merchants who don’t accept credit cards, PayPal acts as a go-between. Buyers use their credit cards and bank account information to make payments, and PayPal relays the funds to sellers’ PayPal accounts, charging them 30 cents plus a commission – up to 4.4 percent in Australia. The second-most common method of payment on eBay Australia, bank transfers, cost 20 cents each. Australia’s bankers group says PayPal is not immune to fraud as eBay claims. While PayPal does keep bank and credit card account information secret between trading partners, the bankers group decried that it does not verify identity as banks do. EBay’s financial reports indicate that PayPal, while hardly fraud-proof, is getting better at cracking down. Its loss rate is 0.24 percent, down from 0.33 percent a year ago. That means that for every $100 transacted with the service, PayPal has to eat 24 cents because of fraud. EBay contends that when users opt for methods like bank transfers, their transactions are four times more likely to result in a disputed payment. EBay says reducing that risk will attract new buyers to the site. To make the PayPal rule possible, eBay has applied for – and automatically gets – immunity from Australia’s antimonopoly Trade Practices Act. But the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which is investigating, could revoke that immunity if it finds the plan will harm the marketplace. A decision is expected soon." What's happening down in OZ you old roo jumper Barry? B-)
Message 17 of 19
latest reply

Re: Forced to use Paypal

I don't know, but I really think paypal only payments is a good thing especially here, I know so many people who have paid for stuff with bank transfer and never get what they have paid for, and there is no way of getting the money back, my first option is always paypal no matter what. ]:)
Message 18 of 19
latest reply

Re: Forced to use Paypal

It doesn't matter if you send a M.O via registered mail, there is still the potential of it getting lost in mail, where paypal is sent via electrons. The only problem I had with paypal payment and been under investigation/probation was because the seller filed non payment complaint when in the whole time he had the payment, he just never went into paypal to check for my payment as he didn't get an alert that payment was received. That ticked me off. His payments went to a different email account than mail thru ebay. It was all cleared up when I called him on phone. Nice guy and did goo with shipping costs and customs value so I ~might deal again, but if I can find same item thru a regular seller of mine then I will.
Message 19 of 19
latest reply