01-15-2023 04:33 PM
01-18-2023 11:23 AM - edited 01-18-2023 11:26 AM
01-18-2023 01:54 PM
That certainly looks like the mark, and if so, it's certainly borderline antique with the company being formed in 1920 and running on to the 1950's + rather than a confirmed antique. So I guess there's a reason to show pictures when requested after all.
01-18-2023 04:25 PM
Thank you very much, that appears to be it! Much obliged!
01-18-2023 05:05 PM
@sonomabarn67 wrote:
... that mark looks more teens than (antique- 100 years old)...
Uh, the teens would be antique. 1923 was 100 years ago. I've done this, too. We show our age. I was born in the 1940s and a good deal of Victorian stuff was not yet antique, and nothing Edwardian was. Something from the teens was merely used. 😄
-
01-19-2023 06:36 AM
I did catch my blunder and corrected it in my post here"it's certainly borderline antique with the company being formed in 1920". I won't let it happen again. (:
01-19-2023 06:43 AM - edited 01-19-2023 06:45 AM
@sonomabarn67 wrote:
I did catch my blunder and corrected it in my post here"it's certainly borderline antique with the company being formed in 1920". I won't let it happen again. (:
Well, see that you don't! 😄
I am delighted that Orphie solved this one. I got nowhere because I saw the letters as L S.
-