06-09-2017 12:06 PM - edited 06-09-2017 12:09 PM
Hi,
I bought a 1992 magazine listed in "good" condition. When it arrived, I was surprised to see that the cover is 50% detached from the spine. Futhermore, the back bottom edge has many small tears and holes, and the front cover also has some small tears along the edge. I contacted the seller about it, and he is insisting that since the rest of the magazine is fine, that the exact condition of the cover he sent is irrelevant. According to the "good" condition for books (the category magazines fall under), "Very minimal damage to the cover including scuff marks, but no holes or tears." The photos of the magazine in the listing were inaccurate, and he didn't have any other further description. Am I right in saying that the magazine is in fact not in "good" condition and the item is not as described, or am I overreacting?
Thanks for your help!
06-09-2017 02:50 PM
06-09-2017 02:51 PM
he didn't have any other further description.
Interesting how something can be NOT AS DESCRIBED when there is no description??? Though the paper publication is 25 years old, "good condition" does not cut it. I would have 'passed' on that listing. Unfortunately, ebay no longer allows us to see what you bought.
06-09-2017 02:53 PM
06-09-2017 02:56 PM
06-09-2017 02:57 PM
I would say it's a judgement call. It's 25 years old. It's a staple bound magazine. It's probably acceptable but I wouldn't be too angry if someone called it good. But even more, was the condition described in the listing?
For those of us who list a lot of items at a time the repetitive actions can be tiring. I'm sure we sometimes forget to change the condition tab (usually though, we grade items less than what we think they are). We feel we cover for it by actually offering a condition description in the box that ebay provides.
I hope this works out for you!
06-09-2017 02:59 PM
so you open a return or not as described case and follow through...or you keep it as it is....
good to one person is acceptible to another, but you have to decide...you bought it.
06-09-2017 03:00 PM
Magazine grades should be like comic book grading. They go on a number scale. Booksellers are so tuned to traditional book grading that we can forget there is a difference. It is not the same at all, and also differs from this new, like new acceptable crappola. Or bleep-ola. Basically....good ain't good when it comes to traditonal book grading.
06-09-2017 03:01 PM
06-09-2017 03:02 PM
06-09-2017 03:04 PM
06-09-2017 03:14 PM
Magazines should not be included under books, but they are. Here's a good guide aboutmbook grading: http://www.ebay.com/gds/GRADING-THE-CONDITION-OF-VINTAGE-PAPERBACKS-PULPS-/10000000000868612/g.html
06-09-2017 03:18 PM
06-09-2017 04:06 PM
This seller didn't bother to spend the time to even try to describe the item. This is unfair to you but it's also unfair to other sellers who try hard to give info the buyer needs to make a good decision. They can probably list 3 items to every one of ours, but ebay and other sites force us to compete directly with them.
Put another way, by you buying from this seller another, better seller, missed out on a sale.
Still, I think you should connect with the seller and explain your issue. Their reply SHOULD satisfy you - enough to leave a smile on your face.
@dudelikewhoa wrote:
No, the condition wasn't described in the listing. Just the standard "good" as stated by ebay.
Thank you so much!
06-09-2017 04:27 PM
Since your seller is in Germany you can file a dispute and go through the process,but will end up being a lesson as to why you avoid buying international...
06-09-2017 04:41 PM