NUDES? So NO Nudes allowed? unless in PRE 70's Category? And WHAT is a "Sexually Suggestive pose"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-14-2021 10:39 AM
So now there are NO Nudes allowed unless in the PRE 70's category? and just WHAT determines a "Sexually Suggestive Pose" Women in Bikinis? Woman with big Cleavage? Covered Pin-Up pics? Mini Skirts? HOW does ebay determine this? This will END Many sellers businesses and MILLIONES of $$'s for sellers AND ebay. Is this the "Cancel" Culture?? JUST WHY the heck is ebay doing this?? EVERYTHING ebay is doing is KILLING the sellers and will eventually KILL ebay... HOW STUPID....
NUDES? So NO Nudes allowed? unless in PRE 70's Category? And WHAT is a "Sexually Suggestive pose"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-14-2021 10:43 AM
As for a "Sexually Suggestive Pose" , It would be anything the Taliban would not approve of.
NUDES? So NO Nudes allowed? unless in PRE 70's Category? And WHAT is a "Sexually Suggestive pose"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-14-2021 10:46 AM
NUDES? So NO Nudes allowed? unless in PRE 70's Category? And WHAT is a "Sexually Suggestive pose"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-14-2021 11:07 AM
unless in the PRE 70's category?
It is my understanding that there will be NO category soon, and the bots from ebay's department of sensitivity are being prepared to start scanning all art, books, movies, CDs, antique manuscripts etc. for bad words or suspected violations of the new standards regarding "subject matter" that might be offensive.
NUDES? So NO Nudes allowed? unless in PRE 70's Category? And WHAT is a "Sexually Suggestive pose"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-14-2021 11:12 AM
The Supreme Court has already ruled on that. Justice Potter Stewart said:
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it,
