03-02-2018 11:24 PM - edited 03-02-2018 11:28 PM
03-02-2018 11:45 PM
Your logic isn't logical. You don't need to cover the cost of the entire return in your math, only the cost of the return shipping, since all you are doing is switching from accepting buyer-paid remorse returns to paying for the return shipping. And the comparison should be to the shipping cost of the returns you get in a year now, vs how many you would get if you make the change, and where that comes in comprison to the dollar amount of the FVF discount.
Example - In deciding, I looked at my return rate as it is now, and found I had only 2 remorse returns in 2017, with about 6000 sales. I made an educated guess that the number might quadruple with free return shipping, which would make eight. Even if they were the heaviest things I sell and shipped from Hawaii (I'm on the east coast), that might cost me $150 or so in return ship costs. Then I compared it to the 1% of my total sales including shipping cost that I receive back as a TRS. In my case it is well over $3600. So even if I'm wrong about my estimate of how many returns I'd now get, it makes sense.
I hate the principle of it, like most sellers it goes against the grain because I know I'm going to get some things back for no good reason at all, but it makes economic sense.
Now, I don't sell clothing, which it seems to me would be the category that would have the most returns. I think the math would be a lot different if I did. Each seller has to do their calculations based on their own experience and their own numbers.
03-02-2018 11:49 PM
In my math in the above scenario, I didn't even consider that I might get more sales because of the policy. In my most commonly-used categories, almost all my competition is TRS, so I don't think it will make much difference in the quantities of sales.
03-03-2018 12:42 AM
The increase in sales may come about if many people drop out of top rated plus by not accomadating the updated requirements in June.
03-03-2018 12:44 AM
Good point on only having to cover the shipping since you'd get the item back. I guest that is a worst-case scenario of a worthless item. But even then you could now adjust the return amount.
03-03-2018 02:44 AM - edited 03-03-2018 02:45 AM
@justin_collectionwrote:This means for every 100 items you sell, you will save enough money to pay for one return.I don't get this. How do you know how much money it will cost for one return? It's based off of the return shipping cost of the item which will vary depending on the size and weight of the item. So how can you equate this variable with a constant like the 10% discount? Some returns will have return shipping cost of $2.66 while others will be $20 and up.
---
Other things to consider - if you charge for shipping, you don't get a top rated plus discount of the shipping portion. This means you'd need more sales to cover an item's return.
Why not? Can you show me where the update details say this? The way I figure it is that eBay currently charges a FVF on the shipping you charge a buyer. By definition, the TRS Plus 10% discount is for your total FVF for the month. So why wouldn't it include the FVF you paid in shipping? They are both called FVF right?
03-03-2018 03:20 AM
03-03-2018 03:23 AM
@lookng2015wrote:
Because eBay has NEVER based the FVF discount for TRS Plus to include shipping.
Why not? Ask them.
Hm really? Wow I never knew that. Then I guess losing the 10% discount will be less of an impact than I thought because I've been slowly going from free shipping items to charging for shipping for so many years now.
03-03-2018 05:41 AM - edited 03-03-2018 05:43 AM
I just considered these three facts:
a) Buyers already have access to free returns via false SNAD disputes.
b) I have had 0 false SNAD disputes in the last 500 transactions
c) Although I am Top Rated, I have never once listed a TRS+ item
So the question about whether to bother with Free Returns answers itself.
Unless eBay forces me to offer Free Returns, I can't be bothered to edit 5,000 listings. If they eventually do force me to offer Free Returns, it will be a pain to change all the listings but it probably won't have any effect when I do.
03-03-2018 05:47 AM
What could happen in the worst case scenario?
an increase in returns?
it was my concern when decided to offer 30 days return long ago.
of course I don’t sell clothing, stay away from designer stuff and electronics.
i noticed nothing out of the ordinary so I stuck to 30 days
today I would go along with the flow, as I always do and see what happens.
i don’t believe “the free return” part will change anything.
i would b surprised if it did
again I speak for what I sell
so for me it’s not that it makes sense, I just don’t expect a loss.
and if wrong I can always change things.
03-03-2018 05:51 AM
I do sell clothes and even tho my return rate is only about 1.3% for all returns - I don't think I'm going to risk it. I did get a promo from Ebay wherein they would cover any returns out of their pocket for 30 days - but I'm on the fence about even trying it for that long.
03-03-2018 06:22 AM
@tunicaslotwrote:I do sell clothes and even tho my return rate is only about 1.3% for all returns - I don't think I'm going to risk it. I did get a promo from Ebay wherein they would cover any returns out of their pocket for 30 days - but I'm on the fence about even trying it for that long.
If I sold clothing, i’d B a little worried too.
03-03-2018 06:30 AM
03-03-2018 06:37 AM
I'm surprised no one is mentioning the restocking fee. Sure, free returns cost you shipping. Which would be first class $2.66 for me. Pennies. But i have 10-20% restocking fees.... Because a lot of my buyers are either stupid, or ignorant. Now, yes, I know these are strong words. But, they are very accurate. I have an 8% return rate. I post detailed pictures, and information. Buyers, DO NOT READ. My pictures are more than enough to answer almost the majority of buyer questions. So yeah, I do a restocking fee. So now I no longer feel bad about getting returns. I get to make a little money on it. AND it pays for the effort it takes. The extra time required for the whole process, including communication. Having to prove to the buyer that they are mistaken. Which was a lot easier when ebay didn't FORCE RETURN AUTHORIZATIONS! Freaken morons.... THe lack of availability of that item to be sold to someone else in that time span. So you could lose a sale, because someone bought your item by mistake . The mandatory hold while the return is going, which can take weeks sometimes. So now you're out the item AND money. Having a part that now has scratches, because people don't CARE about someone elses property.
You are all forgetting the TRUE costs of doing business. And now you want to PAY for buyers mistakes? Anyone that doesn't think that telling buyers their returns are FREE, will increase returns, has not put any thought into it. At least before, a buyer might question " hmm, is it worth it?". Now? Of course it's worth it. It's FREE. They can order 10 pairs of something, as if they are at a store trying things on, and try to find one that fits. You're sales will increase. Sure. Because buyers no longer fear having ANY actual cost associated with it. We aren't amazon. Or walmart. We need to stop being both.
03-03-2018 06:42 AM
@justin_collectionwrote:say your final value fees are 10%. With top rated plus you get a 10% discount on your fees. 10% of 10 is 1 so you are saving 1% of the sale price of your item for each item you sell.This means for every 100 items you sell, you will save enough money to pay for one return.
Except that mathmatically it doesn't remotely work like that unless you sell the exact same price, weight, shipping rate, for everything you deal in.
One sale may be a $70 item with $7 shipping. Another a $6 item with $3 shipping. How about those sales that include the shipping for free... so ALL of that combined price receives the 1% TRSplus discount.
Since it isn't a straight forward business in sales, this over-simplified formula won't work at all.