09-06-2021 02:08 PM
This is for anyone who has seller requirement rules on their account. (IE I block all bidders with 2+ unpaid item strikes within the last 6 months).....
There is a confirmed bug/glitch that has some buyers showing phantom strikes on their account. IE they have never been given an unpaid item strike.. but their account shows they have. As such, anyone with buyer requirements on their account are phantom blocking these customers.
I had 4 customers report to me they could not bid on my listings, tell me they wanted to bid more than the items actually sold for, and called me colorful words while throwing accusations of wrong doing at me all in the last 2 weeks.
I called in to support unsure if it was a run of bad buyers, or some glitch. I was told not only is it a known bug, but there were multiple tickets about the issue already in progress. I was added to one of these tickets myself.
So be aware.. they are not announcing this bug.. and they are allowing sellers to keep listing knowing they will have blocked bidders costing sellers money.
09-06-2021 02:15 PM
I have buyers blocked if they have 2 or more unpaid item strikes in the last 12 months. Works for me.
Any buyer that gets outraged at not being able to bid, is a buyer I don't need, you probably don't need them either.
No one but the winning bidder, knows how much they bid. It's always interesting when losers say "I would have bid more than ##" when ## is not usually the highest bid, the winner bid.
I wouldn't think this is an issue but a blessing. But that is me.
Thanks for the info...
09-06-2021 03:29 PM
Every item that sells is public knowledge as far as price goes. The bidder is partially anonymous (you can see their feedback record) but the item price itself is visible to all for 90 days. Not sure why you thought otherwise.
09-06-2021 03:34 PM
The winning bidders HIGH bid is not known. The winning big is just the bid that was required to win above the second highest bidder. It may or may not be their full high bid.
But ok, pick apart my reply.
09-06-2021 04:33 PM
Oh, I recognize the OP's id.
09-06-2021 04:36 PM
See it's replies like that that get you terse retort's from me. If the person intended to bid higher than it sold for.. even if they still lost, the item would have sold for at least their intended bid (plus the next bump up).... the final value is visible to all as I stated.
09-06-2021 05:01 PM
That's weird....I've never had that happen to me before.
09-06-2021 05:10 PM
keep an eye out.. confirmed bug and tickets are made
09-06-2021 05:12 PM
@eye_of_the_tiger wrote:That's weird....I've never had that happen to me before.
Me either. At work we have a block on bidders with 1 strike or more (with the volume comes the issues), and I can't recall in the past 8+ yrs that I've been managing the account that we've had any buyer complain about not being allowed to purchase, at least not due to a strike block. We have an extensive list of blocked buyers due to issues of their own creation, but that's another story altogether.
-Bob.
09-06-2021 05:29 PM - edited 09-06-2021 05:34 PM
@imac7065 wrote:There is a confirmed bug/glitch that has some buyers showing phantom strikes on their account. IE they have never been given an unpaid item strike.. but their account shows they have. As such, anyone with buyer requirements on their account are phantom blocking these customers.
Okay, first of all, if you look at your Buyer Requirements Activity Log (here), are you able to see blocked bid attempts that match the feedback counts and listing number(s) for your complaining parties?
@imac7065 wrote:I had 4 customers report to me they could not bid on my listings, tell me they wanted to bid more than the items actually sold for, and called me colorful words while throwing accusations of wrong doing at me all in the last 2 weeks.
That sounds a bit like the sour-grapes messages I've had after the end of some of my auctions, though they're usually asking whether I have more examples of whatever they missed out on; I have to admit that I have not had any complaining that they were blocked from bidding at all.
I suppose it might be possible for a sniper to not discover that until it was too late, but anyone bidding earlier would have had time to contact me (or you, in your case) to ask about it. (You can set Seller Preferences to prevent blocked bidders from contacting you, but if they're able to reach you after the auction, they would not have been blocked from reaching you earlier as well.) You would have time to clear them manually, which I will get to further down in this reply.
@imac7065 wrote:I called in to support unsure if it was a run of bad buyers, or some glitch. I was told not only is it a known bug, but there were multiple tickets about the issue already in progress. I was added to one of these tickets myself.
So be aware.. they are not announcing this bug.. and they are allowing sellers to keep listing knowing they will have blocked bidders costing sellers money.
To be honest, I don't believe Customer Support promises any further than I could throw them by the leg. Their stories and promises are legendary; their mission is to get you off the phone so they can get on to the next buyer. It is possible that they can see multiple complaint tickets on the same theme as whatever you are calling about, but that does not make the complaints valid. Evan the Weekly Chat reps are unable to get much detail on what is actually a bug and/or what is actually being investigated at any given time.
If you get another complaint like this that comes in before the end of the listing so that you have time to do something about it, and you believe the bidder's tale of woe, you can add him to your Buyer Requirements Exemption List (here) and he can bid or buy to his heart's content. Hopefully he will pay you as well. Good luck.
09-06-2021 11:43 PM - edited 09-06-2021 11:43 PM
Can anyone clarify or verify this "well known bug" that has "tickets" already.
tyler@ebay velvet@ebay travis@ebay jasmen@ebay
09-07-2021 12:30 AM
09-07-2021 01:30 AM
@imac7065 wrote:See it's replies like that that get you terse retort's from me. If the person intended to bid higher than it sold for.. even if they still lost, the item would have sold for at least their intended bid (plus the next bump up).... the final value is visible to all as I stated.
We can see what @*_forum_id_* wrote.
@*_forum_id_* wrote:It's always interesting when losers say "I would have bid more than ##" when ## is not usually the highest bid, the winner bid.
Thanks for the info...
Please stop.