06-10-2020 06:19 AM
Does anybody recognise this watermark?
Solved! Go to Best Answer
06-10-2020 09:56 AM
@argon38 wrote:Have you investigated Edinburgh Crystal?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edinburgh_Crystal
They used a lion rampant mark, but whether this is theirs or not I cannot say.
People at this site seem to think the mark is Edinburgh Crystal, too:
https://www.glassmessages.com/index.php?topic=56720.0
06-10-2020 09:20 AM
Have you investigated Edinburgh Crystal?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edinburgh_Crystal
They used a lion rampant mark, but whether this is theirs or not I cannot say.
06-10-2020 09:56 AM
@argon38 wrote:Have you investigated Edinburgh Crystal?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edinburgh_Crystal
They used a lion rampant mark, but whether this is theirs or not I cannot say.
People at this site seem to think the mark is Edinburgh Crystal, too:
https://www.glassmessages.com/index.php?topic=56720.0
06-10-2020 11:39 AM
@maxine*j wrote:
@argon38 wrote:Have you investigated Edinburgh Crystal?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edinburgh_Crystal
They used a lion rampant mark, but whether this is theirs or not I cannot say.
People at this site seem to think the mark is Edinburgh Crystal, too:
https://www.glassmessages.com/index.php?topic=56720.0
I have to confess that very page was the source of my suggestion 😀 .
06-10-2020 12:11 PM
note that it is not a watermark, just a mark.
06-10-2020 02:58 PM - edited 06-10-2020 02:59 PM
@argon38 wrote:
@maxine*j wrote:
@argon38 wrote:Have you investigated Edinburgh Crystal?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edinburgh_Crystal
They used a lion rampant mark, but whether this is theirs or not I cannot say.
People at this site seem to think the mark is Edinburgh Crystal, too:
https://www.glassmessages.com/index.php?topic=56720.0
I have to confess that very page was the source of my suggestion 😀 .
That's too bad, in a way, since that means we have only one source for the identification. I found other (verbal) references to the mark, but only that one had a picture of the mark. Hope the ID is correct.