Moved from Picasa thread:
chessspy ( 3 )
06/09/07 06:42 AM (#6 of 10)
Hi, All,
I have just posted the photo's I took in London this morning. On my picasa photo site
http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/chessspy/2007_0609London
Should get it (cause I cut and pasted it (Jon), good eh?)
They start in Portobello Road, and then I went to Antiquarious on The Kings Road, Then on to Elizabeth Street.
I tried to snap all the sets I saw just as they were in the cabinets, and then I snapped a card with the dealers details on.
Now some didn't have any and on some I'll add in contact details as I get time later, so please don't contact anyone until I have made it clear what sets belong to which dealer will try to get it done this evening.
Garrick Coleman's shop has so many good sets I just snapped two or three, and you should go to his web site for a look at all his sets.
For the other dealers I pretty well snapped all they had.
Regards Alan D.
> computojon (271 )
> 06/09/07 07:29 AM (#7 of 10)
>
>
> Great photos!
>
> chessspy (3 )
> 06/09/07 11:24 AM (#8 of 10)
>
>
> Thanks Jon,
> I have just finished labeling them.
> You should be able to work out who owns what easily, if not please
> let me know.
> Regards and enjoy.
> Alan D.
>
> computojon (271 )
> 06/09/07 11:41 AM (#9 of 10)
>
>
> Thanks Alan, very helpful.
>
> Are there any opinions of the set in photo #80, a rosewood Calvert-
> type set. I was thinking of contacting Alexe Stanion about it.
>
> chessspy (3 )
> 06/09/07 01:37 PM (#10 of 10)
>
>
> Hi, Jon,
> Yes, what a shame Martin Jones didn't think to give the size of the
> king.(unless I've missed it)
> Also I've gone through and tried to give click-able links, but apart
> from G.C. non of them are much use. (These antiques dealers aren't up
> to much on the web front).
> However I have Telephone numbers for most of them, so if you or
> anyone wants to contact any of the dealers please just phone me on my
> mobile, 07944 042 970, at any time, as it will be on answer-phone
> during the hours of darkness, and I will e-mail the relevant details
> to you.
> I think #80 looks a fine set.
>
>
>