01-23-2018 03:00 AM
Is the intention to permanently do away with HTML editing capability in posts here?
HTML tab disappeared quite a while back for a period of time, came back, and was there until last night or so. Now it's gone again in Firefox 31.
I *need* it to deal with the subpar quoting capabilities here (break one huge mono block of quoted material into sections for targeted replies to specific points and trimming) and for cleaning up formatting messes the RTF editor makes at times.
(in Firefox 3.6.24 where I do most of my posting next to nothing works so I just post in (partial) HTML there, but here in FF31 I need the HTML editor for fixing posts often)
Solved! Go to Best Answer
01-23-2018 03:26 PM
Based on Lithium recommendations and internal eBay IT security requirements, we've disabled HTML in the Community.
@Members can still @ mention, post links, and post images.
If you cut and paste into the rich text editor from a website, like eBay, you'll potentially get an HTML error message. If you need to format text, I recommend cutting and pasting as plain text, using the rich text options that are available.
If you're using an alternative browser (i.e. SeaMonkey) that's not compatible with the Lithium platform, you may experience compatibility issues.
The Lithium Community is designed to operate on most web browsers that support modern web standards. For the best possible experience, we recommend using of one of the following browsers:
Desktop Browsers
Windows (Version 7+)
Chrome
Firefox
Internet Explorer 11
Microsoft Edge
Mac (Version 10.11+)
Safari
Chrome
Firefox
Mobile Browsers
Android (Version 4.4+)
Chrome
iOS (Version 10+)
Safari
Here's a link to a list of Lithium customer success stories, including multiple large companies who find Lithium to be very functional discussion board solution: https://www.lithium.com/customer-success/all/
@berserkerplanet wrote:
Is the intention to permanently do away with HTML editing capability in posts here?
HTML tab disappeared quite a while back for a period of time, came back, and was there until last night or so. Now it's gone again in Firefox 31.
I *need* it to deal with the subpar quoting capabilities here (break one huge mono block of quoted material into sections for targeted replies to specific points and trimming) and for cleaning up formatting messes the RTF editor makes at times.
(in Firefox 3.6.24 where I do most of my posting next to nothing works so I just post in (partial) HTML there, but here in FF31 I need the HTML editor for fixing posts often)
01-23-2018 06:04 AM
Yeah, that's the only way I can Paste anything. Ctrl-V and Right Click, Paste don't work in the Rich Text tab. I have to keep switching back and forth between tabs to construct posts so that they're readable.
I don't have that problem on real, functional boards.
01-23-2018 01:21 PM - edited 01-23-2018 01:24 PM
Pasting issue:
I mentioned this a while back in your older thread, and it isn't exactly the sequence you're seeing, but if there is a dom.event.clipboardevents.enabled setting (or similar) in your SeaMonkey config you might want to try toggling it and see if that fixes the problem. (if it does you'd then need to figure out what else that breaks - if anything - and if it does, which is the lesser evil.)
I leave it toggled to on to be able to paste in the forums (because Lithium chose to require that functionality), but when on, it breaks pasting elsewhere on eBay (item notes input boxes, etc). I use a bookmarklet to pop open the FireFox about:config dialog to that setting when I need to do so A kludge, but about the only way because security considerations in browser code.
( about:config?filter=clipboardevents )
https://community.ebay.com/t5/Community-Platform-Feedback/Wow/m-p/27571629/highlight/true#M4765
01-23-2018 02:11 PM
Trying it out. Working so far, but not sure of side-effects.
01-23-2018 03:14 PM
01-23-2018 03:26 PM
Based on Lithium recommendations and internal eBay IT security requirements, we've disabled HTML in the Community.
@Members can still @ mention, post links, and post images.
If you cut and paste into the rich text editor from a website, like eBay, you'll potentially get an HTML error message. If you need to format text, I recommend cutting and pasting as plain text, using the rich text options that are available.
If you're using an alternative browser (i.e. SeaMonkey) that's not compatible with the Lithium platform, you may experience compatibility issues.
The Lithium Community is designed to operate on most web browsers that support modern web standards. For the best possible experience, we recommend using of one of the following browsers:
Desktop Browsers
Windows (Version 7+)
Chrome
Firefox
Internet Explorer 11
Microsoft Edge
Mac (Version 10.11+)
Safari
Chrome
Firefox
Mobile Browsers
Android (Version 4.4+)
Chrome
iOS (Version 10+)
Safari
Here's a link to a list of Lithium customer success stories, including multiple large companies who find Lithium to be very functional discussion board solution: https://www.lithium.com/customer-success/all/
@berserkerplanet wrote:
Is the intention to permanently do away with HTML editing capability in posts here?
HTML tab disappeared quite a while back for a period of time, came back, and was there until last night or so. Now it's gone again in Firefox 31.
I *need* it to deal with the subpar quoting capabilities here (break one huge mono block of quoted material into sections for targeted replies to specific points and trimming) and for cleaning up formatting messes the RTF editor makes at times.
(in Firefox 3.6.24 where I do most of my posting next to nothing works so I just post in (partial) HTML there, but here in FF31 I need the HTML editor for fixing posts often)
01-23-2018 03:37 PM
01-23-2018 03:42 PM
doug@ebay wrote:If you're using an alternative browser (i.e. SeaMonkey) that's not compatible with the Lithium platform, you may experience compatibility issues.
The Lithium Community is designed to operate on most web browsers that support modern web standards. For the best possible experience, we recommend using of one of the following browsers:
Desktop Browsers
Windows (Version 7+)Chrome
Firefox
Internet Explorer 11
Microsoft Edge
Mac (Version 10.11+)
Safari
Chrome
Firefox
You realize that SM is the more advanced and secure grandfather of FF and is written by the same people, right?
01-23-2018 04:33 PM
I thought Sea Monkeys were brine shrimp.
SeaMonkey as a web browser is not on Lithium's approved list, so I wouldn't recommend using it while browsing the eBay Community. FireFox is on the list, so I'd recommend that, even though I prefer Chrome.
I was not familiar with SeaMonkey until today.
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/
"SeaMonkey uses much of the same Mozilla source code which powers such successful siblings as Firefox and Thunderbird. "
You realize that SM is the more advanced and secure grandfather of FF and is written by the same people, right?
01-23-2018 04:42 PM
I remember Mozilla>Netscape>Firefox.
In the late 90s I used Netscape, then Internet Explorer, then FireFox. I think somewhere in there I tried Opera for a bit. Once I changed to Chrome, I've stuck with Chrome.
Usability used to be much more of a design issue when I was a web designer way back.
Now I test in latest versions of Chrome, IE, FireFox, IOS and Android.
01-23-2018 04:47 PM
doug@ebay wrote:I was not familiar with SeaMonkey until today.
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/
"SeaMonkey uses much of the same Mozilla source code which powers such successful siblings as Firefox and Thunderbird. "
That's not even quite accurate. SM has been around since long before FF, though at the time it was still referred to as Mozilla Suite which was the offshoot of Netscape, the original competition for IE when people started to break away. Thunderbird may be a sibling in ways, but FF is a runaway cousin.
If it wasn't for the people who wrote Mozilla and SeaMonkey, there mighty never have been an FF. It was started as an abbreviated version of Mozilla that stripped out the email and composer clients.
To imply that SM is a less advanced, less secure browser than FF makes no sense. It's considerably more rubust than FF, just not as 'trendy'. To me, the fact that FF can be 'hacked' by so many people as far as writing extensions to modify the performance and apperance makes it less secure and trustworthy.
If this site would embrace SM as the 'preferred' browser, you wouldn't be having the problems you are tryhing to please the Chrome authors.
01-23-2018 04:52 PM
doug@ebay wrote:
I think somewhere in there I tried Opera for a bit.
The old Opera was far better than any of the others besides SM I still use Opera 10 for a lot of sites where it works. Opera 11 changed the core to a different engine, same as Chrome I think. I really wish they hadn't done that and continued developing the original version. The creators in Oslo ran into money problems I guess and had to change course. I don't remember the full story now.
I won't use Chrome at all. I refuse to submit to the will of G.
01-23-2018 04:56 PM
@chrysylys I will download SeaMonkey and learn more about it.
@chrysylys wrote:
doug@ebay wrote:
I was not familiar with SeaMonkey until today.
https://www.seamonkey-project.org/
"SeaMonkey uses much of the same Mozilla source code which powers such successful siblings as Firefox and Thunderbird. "
That's not even quite accurate. SM has been around since long before FF, though at the time it was still referred to as Mozilla Suite which was the offshoot of Netscape, the original competition for IE when people started to break away. Thunderbird may be a sibling in ways, but FF is a runaway cousin.
If it wasn't for the people who wrote Mozilla and SeaMonkey, there mighty never have been an FF. It was started as an abbreviated version of Mozilla that stripped out the email and composer clients.
To imply that SM is a less advanced, less secure browser than FF makes no sense. It's considerably more rubust than FF, just not as 'trendy'. To me, the fact that FF can be 'hacked' by so many people as far as writing extensions to modify the performance and apperance makes it less secure and trustworthy.
If this site would embrace SM as the 'preferred' browser, you wouldn't be having the problems you are tryhing to please the Chrome authors.
01-23-2018 04:59 PM
I submitted to the will of Google long ago, thus my Chrome and phone loyalty.
@chrysylys wrote:
I won't use Chrome at all. I refuse to submit to the will of G.
01-23-2018 05:12 PM
Everyone knows that unsupported, abandoned, annoying Windows 10 Phone is the one true path to success 🙂
(that's what my, uh, friend says. Yeah my friend. Certainly not me.....)