Professional eBay Sellers Alliance
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Share Post
This content is old, go here to start a new post.

DOES EBAY HAVE A FUTURE?

Pathfinder
Until now a lot of the discussions in this forum have been about the present situation of Ebay members. The general idea seems to be to take stock of the situation, set an agenda and to present this to Ebay in order to effect certain positive changes. But I think we also need to use this opportunity to discuss whether or not Ebay actually even has a real future. Even the most seldom visitor to this forum knows: turnover rates for many members are down and profits in the last few months have also taken dramatic cuts. A common question is “Where have all the good customers gone?” In order to answer this question it’s important to look at the roots of the company. Ebay, which used to be known as Auctionworld, was conceived from the very beginning as an auction house. The first step was made by the rare collectibles market which was able to find buyers through this new channel of business. In the past sellers and collectors had to go to conventions or shows – often thousands of miles away – or they had to sell through live auction houses and thereby count on paying massive fees. The genius of the Ebay model was that all of these sellers were able to, through this new channel, spare themselves massive costs. This fact made the rounds quite quickly. And what started off as a small clan of Pez collectors soon opened up to people coming in from all parts of the collectibles, antiques, and art markets. And then, just as quickly, we had dealers of used articles of almost every kind. Newspaper articles at this time featured some very self assured quotes out of Ebay management circles: “A monkey could drive this train.” (Fortune, 11. August 2003, Adam Lashinsky.) No wonder: the idea behind the business was so ground-breaking that it seemed like it would revolutionize the global auction market. Today, some years later, there is not much left of this vision. In the last few years the management has mainly concentrated on improving the technical functions of the site, expanding worldwide (mostly done through the takeover of already existing similar sites), winning over new members, and constantly honing its unprecedented self-glorification in the history of economics. Initiatives to take care of buyers basically are rare. Whenever in the past there were bidders who had been cheated we would hear, “We’re just a venue.” They always acted as if they favored sellers who allowed themselves to become completely financially dependent on Ebay, but at the same time we would hear about a “principle that at Ebay all users are held to the same conditions: the private person who is there for the very first time just like the powerseller.” (Fr. Interview with Philipp Justus, managing director of Ebay.de in Tomorrow, January 2004, pg. 41) These principles, “We’re just a forum” and “All sellers are treated equally” are IMO essentially the Achilles’s Heel of the company. Let’s look back at the golden age of the US tobacco industry when about 20 years ago a couple of people brought the first lawsuits against these giants of the US economy. Back then they were given slim chances of success. The tobacco industry defended itself mainly with two arguments: on the one hand nicotine was not addictive (at least according to the legendary 7 “dwarves”, the bosses of the seven largest tobacco companies, 1994 in front of Congress) and on the other hand people smoke of their own free will. However, in the following years the term “free will” was relativized by the court system. The tobacco industry can no longer use this as an argument, because of their remarkably aggressive advertising which we are confronted with every day which was said to have deliberately led people into addiction. Once led to the consumption of the products, the victims were not able to free themselves from the habit. The industry therefore is given a massive share of the responsibility for the health problems of the smokers. Do you see any similarities to Ebay? We ask ourselves, “Where have all of the good customers gone?” Let’s look at this from the point of view of the buyer. John Doe is looking for a present for his darling wife. He reads a couple of the hyped-up articles about Ebay which have been written recently. Evenings in front of the TV he sees another one of their big expensive commercials. Finally John hears from a friend that he “just yesterday” made an awesome deal on Ebay. Full of expectation he goes to his computer and gets registered as an Ebay user. After a short search he finds a fitting present, he bids, and sends off his money to the seller. Some weeks later – he’s still waiting for his purchase to arrive – John complains and to his disappointment finds out that in the meantime the seller has been deleted from Ebay. And then after a little research he finds out that he’s been conned. Ebay states its position – as it always does – “we’re just a venue”. If he had bought an expensive computer, it would remain his problem. If he, on the other hand, had “just” purchased some cheap toy he could go through the process of getting compensation through Ebay’s insurance. If any of you have gone through this process, you know that for a new customer, if they were to do it at all, this would mean a huge amount of time and effort. And we still ask ourselves, “Where have all the good customers gone”! What would we do in our friend’s position? An answer isn’t necessary. A much more important question is: how many future customers are now going to be turned away from Ebay through John’s negative word of mouth? And: how long can Ebay hold to its naïve position of “we’re just a venue”? How long will it take before the first class-action lawsuits come in against the company? I don’t know much about the US court system, but in my opinion in Austria, Switzerland (location of eBay's International Headquarters) or Germany it will only be a matter of time until a suit due to negligence leading to corporate fraud is brought before the courts. The problem is that these suits are not going to end at the various satellite-sites but rather at www.ebay.com and sooner or later the skies over Ebay in America will also begin to darken. And let’s be honest with ourselves: this situation cannot continue forever. The ever-increasing army of victims cannot continue to be ignored (or even ridiculed as they sometimes are) by the Ebay colossus as it continues to get fatter and fatter. I ask myself, what has Ebay actually done in the last few years to put a stop to this systematic fraud? Have the TV ads or PR articles been used to warn against this fraud? Have they, for example on their homepage, placed any large warnings about fraud? Have they during their numerous conferences held any seminars on stopping fraud? Not in the least!! The cigarette industry was also forced to put warnings on their products. But it was of course too late. The question which we as sellers need to ask ourselves is whether or not this boat can still be turned around. I'm personally uncertain. Only little has been undergone in the last few years to protect the good-willed buyer from disappointments. The efforts of the management until now seem to have been too inefficient and too half-hearted. "’Our best decisions have been the ones where we've seen where the community was going," says PayPal chief Matt Bannick. "Some of our biggest mistakes occurred when we put on our consultant's hats and got in a room and made decisions.’" (fr. same Fortune article as above). I believe the Ebay managers would have been best to have left their hats in the corner forever and rather dealt with the problems of their buyers (among all the others issues previously discussed in this forum). Then they would have noticed that, especially in the auction business, defrauded customers hardly ever return. To the contrary: what they do is spread bad word of mouth and damage the customer base in a very dangerous way. It was only a matter of time before we started seeing slumps in business. That they would appear as brutally as they have to some sellers in the last months, none of us would have been able to predict. But none of us belong to Ebay management. I believe that the people at Ebay forgot long ago that they are an auction house. Because one of the most important principles in the world of auctions is to NOT treat all sellers “according to the same conditions”. In every auction house around the world it is common for large sellers to receive better conditions than smaller ones. Is that not in fact one of the most essential of the principles of our market-based economy? Whenever I think of these Ebay principles I feel like I’m in a bad movie. It looks to me like every single one of us is just being laughed at. Many of us have formed a financial dependence (thank God I’m not one of them) which is as good as irreversible. I can well imagine the bitterness that some of us experience when it becomes clear that still today, many hundreds of thousands of dollars of Ebay fees later, we’re still being treated like the “private citizen who’s there for the first time”. In my eyes it’s only a matter of time before the first of us begin to organize and start our own platform. Jeff Hess (see Hessfine in “San Jose – Another Problem – Fees increase” 1/6/04, #29 of 62) recently brought this up in this forum, “If ten of us who (pay) average fee's of 200k per year got together, we could have two million dollars to promote a new site.” Since I personally am rather uncertain if on the basis of the above mentioned principles Ebay can, in the long run, maintain its place in the market, I too have been kicking around the idea of investing my Ebay fees in starting up my own site for quite some time. I was, however, rather thinking of an auction site. In closing, a short anecdote: Some years ago I spent part of my apprenticeship in the Dorotheum in Vienna (founded 1707), one of the largest auction houses on the planet. One of the directors told me shortly before his retirement the following, “You know, our art auctions don’t actually bring in a single penny. And nevertheless, year after year we invest increasing amounts into this sector. But the whole thing is just adornment - just one big show to serve as entertainment for our customers. All of the fabulous opening galas, the press conferences, the million dollar hammer prices and the many single owner sales – it’s all just entertainment. Because our true business is with our mass-produced objects: industry jewellry, accessories, and small gifts. But we should NEVER forget that our buyers only come to us because of our auctions i.e. the entertainment that we offer them. In principle it’s exactly like Las Vegas.” I look forward to your postings. Alexander Zacke Official Ebay University Lecturer, definitely attending the Elite Summit, no matter where & when it will take place
Message 1 of 56
40 Views
55 REPLIES 55

in reply to Jan 14, 2004 8:47:52 AM
To answer your question Alexander, "NO" I dont think ebay has a future. amit
Message 2 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 14, 2004 11:40:29 AM
Wow! Well written. Thanks for taking the time to post this. Does eBay have a future? Probably. People have been buying, selling and trading for thousands of years. Commerce is not likely to stop. There is a major problem with the eBay auction format. People have figured it out. They know not to bid until close to the end of the auction so that the price will not esculate. eBay needs to solve this problem. There needs to be some reason for a buyer to place a bid prior to the last day of the auction. You have to look at eBay for what it really is. It's an advertising device. It really functions no different from a classified section of a newspaper. You put an ad in the paper and you sell your merchandise. In a local paper, the customer comes to pick up and pay for the merchandise. On eBay you ship the merchandise to them. What is the biggest threat to eBay's survival? It is my opinion that the biggest threat to eBay's survival is the huge fees that they take out of the sale price. In our case it's about 18%. With the rates going up it will be over 22%. No one can spend 22% on advertising and stay in business long term. If eBay is going to survive long term, they will have to figure out how to have more efficient fees that fit into standard advertising models. That is their challenge. JOEFRIDAY2
Message 3 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 14, 2004 6:46:40 PM
Alexander There have been some threads about ebay's futue. Read Another 'falling star'? This can't be good.. I specifically mention in there about non performing seller's being in my opinion the biggest issue we all have as a long term threat to our future and ebay's future. In fact this week i will be on a conference call with trust and safety to push my agenda in this regard. Steve



Steve
Message 4 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 14, 2004 7:19:45 PM
Alexander Zacke, Well thought and written. Here is the author of any communication with EBay and if his written skill are any example of his oral skills, we might just have a verbal presenter for the EBay Elite. To Follow up his point, I have been an EBay stock holder for 4 years and made ALOT of money. I currently have ZERO EBay stock. I had at one time in excess of 2000 shares. EBay has become a VERY FAT cat, they have 10 times as many people as one could possibly need, doing 1/20th the amount of work that needs to be done. They are no different than any other Fortune 100 company. They get so BIG that it is like trying to steer the Titanic away from the iceberg, unlike most of our companies, we are like speed boats, we can zigzag when necessary. EBay is heading towards the iceberg, and anyone very closely involved with EBay realizes this.... The problem is the decision makers for EBay are not closely involved and have not noticed the evolution of the marketplace, and do not realize what worked 3-4 years ago, no longer works. My business would hurt without EBay but it would survive, guess what if you know it not, YOU all would too!
Message 5 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 14, 2004 10:26:44 PM
The market is betting on the future of eBay and so am I. From a business model standpoint -- eBay is a beautiful thing. It (eBay) is a almost perfect business model. eBay must continue to maintain their "only a venue" status and not operate as a auction house -- Unless each seller out there wants to really become a true auctioneer and pay whatever license fees and be scrutinized by the bureaucracy that exists in each of the states in which they do business. I think not. I see little similarity in the tobacco settlement when compared to eBay, though as a non smoker, I am only mildly versed in the full outcome of the tobacco settlement. A carton of cigs went up, the price per share of Phillip Morris took a hit, advertisements changed, Kentucky and Virginia further subsidized tobacco farmers, and the big revelation: .... kids still smoke! But lets not fool ourselves here. When you utter the word eBay, You are talking about a company with billions in market capitalization. About the size of Procter and Gamble! As for the cost of running eBay -- it is all there in the shareholders reports. Right there in black and white for the world to see. During the dot-com craze, my company invested heavily in making a run at it. We ranked #7 in our industry after spending 3mil. We were inches away from having Amazon infuse another 20mil into us when R. Franklin (VP Amazon Business Development) realized that would only take us to number 5. Two Million is Pig Fodder! 2Mil would support a proper team of 40 to 50 talented heads for about 8 months. Then you would still need chairs for them to sit in and a roof over their heads. I believe that the present cost per customer acquired online via banner ads is still around $29 (visit Forrester Research). I know Amazon with its 1.2 billion market cap at the time of starting Amazon auctions committed to spending over 100 mil on that site -- how many eBay sellers are over there? The fees are much cheaper. If you do not believe the costs in development, maintaining, and advertising for customers online -- then you have not been there. Why do venture cap firms give 10mil to something you or I might not invest a buck in? It is not because they are stupid. It is because they know 5mil will not get the job done. For the positive points in this post. Does eBay need to do a better job in circumventing buyer and seller fraud --yes. Can eBay do it and still maintain its venue status -- in my opinion Yes. Are the good customers who are on eBay right now worth more than the ones who might sign on in the future as a result of some stupid ad -- my vote is yes. Do bad transactions deter buyers from returning-- yes. But, does eBay see this -- sometimes I do not think so- and if they do -- they do not act like it. As most sellers of a tangible goods know, it is easier and less expensive to maintain a customer than to fish for new ones. Will eBay some day run out of potential users -- Yes -- in about 40 more years eBay's upper management could learn real quick if each board member were required to buy and sell a product(s) on the site and make a living off of it. How many of them would survive with eBay as their only source of income? My guess would be 1 in 20. Now watching eBay management try to do what most large sellers do on a daily basis would be some reality TV worth viewing -- "eBay Survivor - The San Jose Islands". I'd tune in for a good laugh. Best Regards Barry
Message 6 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 15, 2004 12:42:41 AM
Barry, You said: "You are talking about a company with billions in market capitalization." True, but market capitalization is not the point. Net income is the point. And if it is affected, this will affect market capitalization. For the nine months ended 9/30/03, eBay's net income before acct. change was $304.7 million. Results are offset by $30 million of litigation costs. eBay lost a patent infringement lawsuit in May 2003 after a jury found eBay willfully infringed the plaintiff's patents. eBay was ordered to pay MercExchange $29.5 million in damages. This is close to 10% (!) of eBay's net income for the nine months ended 9/30/03. And there is more to come. AT&T Corp. filed suit against PayPal and eBay (only a few weeks ago). AT&T alleges that PayPal and eBay are infringing its U.S. patent covering "transactions in which a trusted intermediary securely processes payments over a communications system such as the Internet." AT&T can expect a contentious battle if the courtroom drama plays out like that of the recent patent lawsuit filed by MercExchange against eBay. In discussing the scheduling of a hearing in the case, the Judge said he would rather have chosen an appointment for a root canal than the hearing. "The only reason I didn't take the root canal was, I couldn't get an appointment." After the trial, Judge Friedman said the it was "one of the more, if not the most, contentious cases that this court has ever presided over." (Fr. Ina Steiner, Auctionbytes.com, November 21, 2003) And, believe me, AT&T probably will not go away with just $30 million. PayPal may be close to settling another suit. Three plaintiffs filed the lawsuit last year over PayPal's customer service and handling of fraud complaints, particularly its practice of freezing customer accounts while investigating complaints. According to court documents, the plaintiffs and PayPal have reached an agreement in principle on a proposed settlement. (Fr. Ina Steiner, Auctionbytes.com, November 21, 2003) Guess how many similar suits against Paypal will follow? In eBay's own words "PayPal faces significant risks of loss due to fraud and disputes between senders and recipients. If PayPal is unable to deal effectively with fraudulent transactions and customer disputes, PayPal's losses from fraud would increase, and its business would be harmed." (Fr. eBay SEC 10-Q Quarterly Report as of 12-Nov-2003) AND: "There are many (legal) risks associated with our (eBay's) international operations. Legal uncertainty regarding liability for the listings and other content provided by our users, including uncertainty as a result of less Internet-friendly legal systems, unique local laws and lack of clear precedent or applicable law." (Fr. eBay SEC 10-Q Quarterly Report as of 12-Nov-2003) Just a few thoughts. Alexander Zacke
Message 7 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 15, 2004 6:59:22 AM
Here's my 2 cents... Will eBay survive? Yes, I think it will. Will there be some speedbumps? Yes, many of which will be eBay's own making. eBay is slow to respond to market changes; changes they do make are usually unhelpful; they seem to have little feel for what real buyers and sellers deal with; etc, etc. There is one caveat to my belief that eBay will survive: eBay execs have already botched several other enterprises (BillPoint, Butterfields, Half, et al). Therefore, I have little confidence in the eBay brass but I do have confidence in the general business model that has been in place since before some of the current screw-ups took over. Anthony Roberts
Anthony Roberts
AACS, inc.
Message 8 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 15, 2004 7:50:57 AM
I would only add that the number of lawsuits surrounding eBay and holdings is probably far less than the number in litigation with any other fortune 500 - especially since eBay does not produce a product and all major cases to date revolve mainly around patent disputes. Everyone in the technology arena is treading water that is very new in legal terms. Business model patents that eBay is litigating were not even granted by the US PTO 6 years ago. They were not recognized - It is all NEW. Any presiding judge would rather not handle such cases as there is little to no precedent to rely upon. The legal system is equally impacted and puzzled by new technology law. A judge's lack of desire is not to be inferred that eBay has any additional culpability - but moreso that the case will take time and a ton of research. The good judge knows that his golf swing will not likely have time to improve in the coming months. Patent issues are very subjective and generally always settled. To any public corporation, they are simply a cost of doing business - just someone reaching in to get a piece of that pie they may or may not be entitled to. Trademark infringements are even less of an issue -- simply cease and desist. Do you think that MercExchange wanted eBay to not use technology even if it did infringe? Without infringement, they would not have a claim of damages or an entitlement to claim a financial reward. You never tell the infringer to stop using -- but that you are out there waiting for them to become successful. With MercExchange there was the normal settlement with the ever valuable license of continued usage of the technology. The 30 mil hit was no surprise to eBay and they knew years earlier that it was coming. These things do not appear overnight. And, in light of eBays continued growth curve (especially in the market) they are still and will continue to be king of the hill. There is a blessing in being "first to market". eBay will continue to reap that reward as all the lemmings continue to line up, some to invest, some to use the product, and some to try to pick the pockets. Simply business as usual. Now lets all say that figure again real slow -- 304 million NET. Not Gross -- NET in nine months. That is another reason why 2mil, 20mil, or even 200mil would fail to develop a competitive product and never damage the eBay brand. Barry (former contributing editor -- Law Office Computing magazine - '88-'91)
Message 9 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 15, 2004 5:56:48 PM
Barry, I appreciate your point, but EBay is in trouble from many fronts: 1.) Stock price, market cap and gross revenue are all near maximum capacity with the current format and billing structures. 2.) Poor acquisition after poor acquisition. Basically Pissing money away. 3.) Competition, not other auction sites, Powersellers, creating their own website and bringing their EBay customers with them 4.) Poor Publicity 5.) Growing Gross revenue and stagnant net revenue 6.) Legal Issues in the publics eye, unlike most other fortune 500 companies, these lawsuits are all news worthy. 6.) Poor Executive intiatives to curb these issues. If the CEO of EBay over the past year has sold 60 MILLION DOLLARS worth of stock, you think she is confident that the stock price will continue to rise? Hell NO! She is not dumb, she saw the peak, and started selling...and has been selling ever since.
Message 10 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 15, 2004 5:59:35 PM
Let me add, that EBay is not going away anytime soon, but if they do not turn the ship and begin to head in the right direction, they will begin to head in the wrong direction. Ebay has found it relatively easy to grow up to this point....now you will see the downward crawl, which will begin the house cleaning of executives that have not addressed the issues at hand.
Message 11 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 15, 2004 6:06:27 PM
Let me also add that your 300 Million NET figure. Guess what if every EBay Elite Member's fees were removed from EBay's bottom line....guess what...EBay shows a LOSS for 2003!
Message 12 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 15, 2004 6:18:52 PM
1.) Stock price, market cap and gross revenue are all near maximum capacity with the current format and billing structures. Seems to me I saw identical comments 2, 3 and 5 years ago. The stock still keeps going up. 2.) Poor acquisition after poor acquisition. Basically Pissing money away. Butterfields was a stupid idea. BillPoint made sense but was poorly implimented. PayPal was an excellent purchae. 3.) Competition, not other auction sites, Powersellers, creating their own website and bringing their EBay customers with them 4.) Poor Publicity eBay is among the most recognized trademarks in the world. 89,000,000 registered users (yes, I know it is inflated) is orders of magnitude larger then virtually any other company. 5.) Growing Gross revenue and stagnant net revenue Omitting special items, net has gone up in every quarter. 6.) Legal Issues in the publics eye, unlike most other fortune 500 companies, these lawsuits are all news worthy. Really? Unlike Ford & Firestone, eBay has never killed anyone. Unlike Sherimg-Plough, Bristol-Meyers and virtually every other pharmaceutacal company, eBay has never had to pay out tens or hundreds of millions of dollars for selling products the kill or injure their customers. Unlike Tyco, MCI, Enron. Parmalat and so many others, no eBay officer is heading for a federal prison. 6.) Poor Executive intiatives to curb these issues.
Message 13 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 15, 2004 10:25:54 PM
I think bobmill and I are on the same eBay. And I think Meg cashing in on some options probably makes sound financial sense for her. Good for her -- she is probably dumping some of that P&G she gets for being on their board of directors as well. Note that there are buyers out there for all these fire sold shares ... even while it is on the uphill climb. I wonder if Martha will join the ranks of those from enron?
Message 14 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 15, 2004 10:36:09 PM
One other point -- where do these numbers come from? I certainly hope that my fees will not be 1 million smacks this year -- 70 - 80k will be enough already.
Message 15 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 16, 2004 7:31:08 AM
bobmill (22975) 01/15/04 06:18 PM (#13 of 15) 1.) Stock price, market cap and gross revenue are all near maximum capacity with the current format and billing structures. Seems to me I saw identical comments 2, 3 and 5 years ago. The stock still keeps going up. >2,3 and 5 years ago you did not see the source of EBay's incomes its Powersellers, forming a group to set forth intiatives to address the fleecing of its primary source of income. 2.) Poor acquisition after poor acquisition. Basically Pissing money away. Butterfields was a stupid idea. BillPoint made sense but was poorly implemented. Paypal was an excellent purchase. >You left out Half.com, lets see Butterfields, Billpoint and Half.com. How much money do you think they wasted on these 3 acquisitions? 3.) Competition, not other auction sites, Powersellers, creating their own website and bringing their EBay customers with them ** Not Addressed 4.) Poor Publicity eBay is among the most recognized trademarks in the world. 89,000,000 registered users (yes, I know it is inflated) is orders of magnitude larger then virtually any other company. >Your right, and also along with being recognized, it is 50% of time thought of in the same sentence as the word FRAUD! 5.) Growing Gross revenue and stagnant net revenue Omitting special items, net has gone up in every quarter. >Omitting, so what they do not count? 6.) Legal Issues in the publics eye, unlike most other fortune 500 companies, these lawsuits are all news worthy. Really? Unlike Ford & Firestone, eBay has never killed anyone. >Ford and Firestone, was a few isolated incendents, and from long standing companies in business for 100 years. Also Firestone has been CRUSHED by this, so would you implication be that EBay is next? Unlike Sherimg-Plough, Bristol-Meyers and virtually every other pharmaceutacal company, eBay has never had to pay out tens or hundreds of millions of dollars for selling products the kill or injure their customers. >Ebay is not in a high risk business, drug companies are in this category. Considering what EBay is the amount of lawsuits including Paypal is ridiculous. Unlike Tyco, MCI, Enron. Parmalat and so many others, no eBay officer is heading for a federal prison. >Do not compare EBay ( a poorly managed company) to Criminals, no one has implied that anyone at EBay is invoolved in criminal activity. 6.) Poor Executive intiatives to curb these issues. ** NO reply Your fees maybe be $70-80k ours are $150k and many here have alot high fees.
Message 16 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 16, 2004 8:34:32 AM
Bob, Barry, Laptopbroker, eBay executives have consistently sold rather than bought the company's stock, says Lon Gerber, director of insider research for Thomson Financial Securities Data. Just between June 1 and Sept. 30, nine insiders at eBay have sold $50.5 million worth at an average price of $53.94 a share, according to Thomson Financial and Mercury News research. This includes board member Scott Cook, who sold 200,000 split-adjusted shares valued at $11 million; Chief Operating Officer Maynard Webb, who also sold 200,000 valued at $11 million; and CEO Meg Whitman, who sold 45,810 shares valued at $2.5 million. Additionally, after many of the insider sales, eBay's stock has tended to decline in value. "From an insider trading perspective, this is definitely negative," Lon Gerber said. But he added, "I wouldn't look at this and say this is abnormal for a tech company." Thought this would interest you. Alexander Zacke
Message 17 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 16, 2004 8:40:55 AM
This is getting old but I will take a stab at this one more time: laptopbroker (9014) 01/16/04 07:31 AM (#16 of 16) bobmill (22975) 01/15/04 06:18 PM (#13 of 15) 1.) Stock price, market cap and gross revenue are all near maximum capacity with the current format and billing structures. Seems to me I saw identical comments 2, 3 and 5 years ago. The stock still keeps going up. >2,3 and 5 years ago you did not see the source of EBay's incomes its Powersellers, forming a group to set forth intiatives to address the fleecing of its primary source of income. BA-- The number of listings on eBay has continued to grow and therefore so have the revenues. Revenue is generated more by FVF's than listings but it is only logical that the percentages that sell do not change fro month to month. My point here is that a listing is a listing is a listing -- no matter who does it -- powersellers or not. The 300 on here are a pinch of ebays total revenue -- assuming 100k each (high figure) would equate to 30mil gross. 2.) Poor acquisition after poor acquisition. Basically Pissing money away. Butterfields was a stupid idea. BillPoint made sense but was poorly implemented. Paypal was an excellent purchase. >You left out Half.com, lets see Butterfields, Billpoint and Half.com. How much money do you think they wasted on these 3 acquisitions? BA ----I do not think that any money was "wasted". With every acquisition -- eBay has gained strength, technology, and more importantly -- customers, not to mention elimination of competition. What you are saying is that advertisement has no value. eg', Anheuser-Busch has been decades trying to spend millions on a little brewery in Belguim. This little brewery named "busch" (translated) has all naming rights in Europe for what we call Busch beer. If their offers to waste millions of dollars on it were only accepted. Same thing here; you need to look outside the box to get the larger picture with eBay. 3.) Competition, not other auction sites, Powersellers, creating their own website and bringing their EBay customers with them ** Not Addressed BA --- I'll address this one... I do not know of a single power seller website that is driving traffic or has become a recognized name. Ooops, Olympus Camera -- but then the chicken came before the egg here. eBay has always been aware that sellers also peddle their merchandise both online and offline in their bricks and mortar stores. They have circumvented as much a possible email solicitations and post sale solicitations to back bidders. This has done two things -- increased revenues and reduced some of the fraud. Of course eBay wants more of every sellers business but they are not blocking or attempting to block your physical or virtual stores. 4.) Poor Publicity eBay is among the most recognized trademarks in the world. 89,000,000 registered users (yes, I know it is inflated) is orders of magnitude larger then virtually any other company. >Your right, and also along with being recognized, it is 50% of time thought of in the same sentence as the word FRAUD! BA ---- 50% sounds like an emotional exaggeration. If it were really that bad, why be here at all? Fraud is still a concern for both sellers and should be of highest priority for eBay -- but it is not 50%. 5.) Growing Gross revenue and stagnant net revenue Omitting special items, net has gone up in every quarter. >Omitting, so what they do not count? BA ----- If eBay went on cruise control and did not spend (invest) the money they could have huge amounts in the till at the end of each quarter -- short term -- then stock prices would fall. Growth is not measured in net revenue. 6.) Legal Issues in the publics eye, unlike most other fortune 500 companies, these lawsuits are all news worthy. Really? Unlike Ford & Firestone, eBay has never killed anyone. >Ford and Firestone, was a few isolated incendents, and from long standing companies in business for 100 years. Also Firestone has been CRUSHED by this, so would you implication be that EBay is next? Unlike Sherimg-Plough, Bristol-Meyers and virtually every other pharmaceutacal company, eBay has never had to pay out tens or hundreds of millions of dollars for selling products the kill or injure their customers. >Ebay is not in a high risk business, drug companies are in this category. Considering what EBay is the amount of lawsuits including Paypal is ridiculous. Unlike Tyco, MCI, Enron. Parmalat and so many others, no eBay officer is heading for a federal prison. >Do not compare EBay ( a poorly managed company) to Criminals, no one has implied that anyone at EBay is invoolved in criminal activity. BA --- There are really not that many lawsuites of merit out there against eBay. Where is this comming from? Please name 5 that have reached current litigation status. 6.) Poor Executive intiatives to curb these issues. ** NO reply Your fees maybe be $70-80k ours are $150k and many here have alot high fees. BA ---- I Do not understand this one. What executive initiatives should be put in place? More money? eBay bucks? And as for cumulative fees, A cursory review of the number of listings (and type) generated by this group shows me that the number is probably less than 25mil.
Message 18 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 16, 2004 8:46:26 AM
Alexander Top eBay execs are all given the stocks in the form of options. Nothing new here. What else can these execs do to convert this form of compensation? Sell -- right?
Message 19 of 56
40 Views

in reply to Jan 16, 2004 9:15:52 AM
Barry, You asked to 'Please name 5 that have reached current litigation status.' First USA Bank has filed suit against PayPal, alleging that the online payment company is infringing on its patents. The lawsuit was filed September 10, 2002, in U.S. District Court in Delaware. It involves two patents that cover "cardless payment" systems, which allow consumers to pay for transactions using a telephone number and a security code. Stamps.com has filed a breach-of-contract suit against PayPal and eBay, claiming the companies derailed an agreement for it to provide shipping tools through the PayPal Web site. IP Defense Firm Orrick represents eBay in a variety of Intellectual Property matters involving patent litigation. Orrick is currently defending eBay and PayPal in a patent infringement suit brought in the Northern District of California by Tumbleweed Communications. PayPal's on-line payment system, as well as eBay's Billpoint payment system, have been alleged to infringe multiple claims of three related patents disclosing electronic document delivery systems. A Markman ruling in the case is pending, as is the Court's consideration of a motion for summary judgment of invalidity of all three patents prepared by Orrick attorneys. Trial is set for September 2004. Separately, privately held Internet company NetMoneyIn has accused PayPal of violating some of its patents related to processing credit and debit card payments, according to PayPal's regulatory filing. NetMoneyIn has said it will sue PayPal if PayPal doesn't license the patents; PayPal does not believe it is violating the patents. Not counting the AT&T, MercExchange and Paypal (freezing customer accounts) litigations already mentioned in this discussion. Not counting the numerous other cases pending in the US. Not counting the numerous cases pending worldwide. Alexander Zacke
Message 20 of 56
40 Views
Reply
This is an open group. Sign in and click the "Join Group" button to become a group member and start posting.