My previous message: https://community.ebay.com/t5/Electronics/Camera-sold-without-memory-card-would-you-call-that-in-wor...
So I left feedback for the seller now, neutral, saying: 'Not immediately operational, indispensable memory card missing, not mentioned.'
The seller in turn left me positive feedback, but wrote that I wanted him to pay for a memory card (which is true) - AND has asked me to revise my feedback on the following grounds:
Buyer received a fully functioning item. I went out of my way to help him with the item, finding an instruction manual online, sending photos to demonstrate the item was fine. He then demanded I send him money to pay for a memory card for the camera (which was NOT part of the listing and never was). I feel this neutral feedback is incredibly misleading and that the buyer has taken advantage of me, and when I refused to send him money has left this critical feedback which is surely against policy.
1. The camera simply does NOT function without a memory card, and a memory card was included in the original package along with battery, charger and other not as necessary stuff.
2. He did not find me a manual - he sent me a link to a promotional brochure, which also mentions the camera being delivered with a memory card.
3. The photos he sent me were probably taken with his second camera (he had two up for sale at the same time), so that proves nothing.
Of course I can buy a memory card, no problem, but it's the principle! Had he written something like 'needs a memory card for full functioning' or just 'comes without memory card', that would have been fair, but there is no mention of the card missing. So that's what makes me rather sour.
What do I do now? Do I revise my feedback?
