cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

I'm thinking 17/18th cent Chinese (region?) but what is that animal, cat, horse...? Aprox 7 1/2 dia. Are those 4 symbols around the rim saying anything?

Message 1 of 29
latest reply
28 REPLIES 28

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

This one, ascribed by the seller to the Honghzi period, fetched £269 ($365):

 

https://auction.catawiki.com/kavels/12410259-hongzhi-qilin-plate-china-1470-1505

Message 16 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

"The image is painted 'quickly' , which makes it adored by many."

Yes, yes, adored by many! I think I'm going to steal that phrase and start using it at shows.

Message 18 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?


@sonomabarn67 wrote:

To my eye, the one that was posted looks like a repop. Where did it come from?


This is the source of that one (for reference only):

 

https://www.lot-art.com/auction-lots/Plate-with-Qilin-Design-Hongzhi-Zhengde-Ming-Dynasty/68-plate_w...

 

That's two plates with this same basic design coming out of Indonesia.

Message 19 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

Not sure what is going on here. The links in Messages 15 and 16 are literally the same plate. Not just the same design - the same plate. It's clear from the photos.

Message 20 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

there is nothing unusual about the 4 Kansi characters around the rim,this piece is not that old.

you can tell from the shape and style of the kirin.

In Hong Kong,an antique dealer will bury his new pieces in the backyard of his country home,and he will go and dig them up after 3 months,this is how he harvested so called antiques.

just because it is dirty and chipped does not mean it is antique,just to the Chinese,it is not worth taking care of.

you can ask Soetheby or Christie Intl if you believe it is genuine 17th c

Put lime in the coconut and call me in the morning !
Message 21 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

kirin,foo dog,any odd animal which looks ferocious the CHINESE cannot identify are mythical animals,back in the old days,foreign dignataries will present Middle Eastern lions (not African lions) to the emperor as gifts  and these mythical animals are descendents or artist rendition or imagination of the ordinary folks.

this is a modern rendition of such,it is kind of comical or playful and it has hooves,lions do not have hooves.

 

Put lime in the coconut and call me in the morning !
Message 22 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

Hey, it's a good design. Why not uae it multiple times? laughing

Message 23 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?


@tofu107 wrote:

there is nothing unusual about the 4 Kansi characters around the rim


Here are the characters. They looked odd to me. Can you identify them?

 

CHARACTER 1.PNG

CHARACTER 2.PNG

CHARACTER 3.PNG

CHARACTER 4.PNG

 

Message 24 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

By way of contrast, the characters on the other plate look unmistakably Chinese:

 

CHARACTER 1.PNGCHARACTER 2.PNGCHARACTER 3.PNGCHARACTER 4.PNG

Message 25 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

Two things; respectfully, I don't believe you, and two, I would not bother with writing to Sotheby's or Christie's regarding a $200-300 piece when I already know that they do not take items that are under $5000 value. Appreciate your input though.

Message 26 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

Here are the other three Chinese saucers that came with the one above. Any thoughts to the period(s)? 5"-7 1/2"

Message 27 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?

And two more.

Message 28 of 29
latest reply

Re: 17th/18th cent Chinese saucer.........Animal?


@sonomabarn67 wrote:

Two things; respectfully, I don't believe you, and two, I would not bother with writing to Sotheby's or Christie's regarding a $200-300 piece when I already know that they do not take items that are under $5000 value. Appreciate your input though.


I have contacted Christie’s many times and there is nothing to it

all can b done on the net...

better b sure than sorry...

 

letoulousain
Message 29 of 29
latest reply