cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Bilderberg 2014

Highlighted
Thrill-Seeker

Bilderberg 2014

Did the Obamas and Clintons get their invites?

 

I’m sure mine got lost in the mail.

 

29 REPLIES
Guide

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

 

Bilderberg    are ou kidding   I think they went the way of
Bigfoot, in fact I think they were related to him.

 

The older my grandchildren get the less I can remember.
Thrill-Seeker

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

If you think they are a joke, you are part of the problem and obviously don’t know anything about them.

 

If you are concerned about the state of the world it would behoove you to at least learn something about the puppet masters.

 

I’m guessing you think Skull and Bones and New World Order are Bigfoots too and that your vote really matters.

 

[By the way in WA, it’s law not to impugn Bigfoot.

 

“The harassing of Bigfoot, Sasquatch or other undiscovered subspecies is a felony punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment.”

 

Also, we can’t ride ugly horses.]

 

 

Bilderbergers are making progress on their agenda. You just have to read the news.

 

Their annual meeting is supposedly coming up in a couple of weeks. They are a bit secretive about dates, times and places.

 

I don’t like to post links and I know a lot of folks don’t like to do a search but a simple Bilderberg 2014 search might enlighten some.

 

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

Ya know,  I read that response last night and thought about commenting but figured, "why bother?"

 

I don't follow the doings of that group but instinctively I can recognize that when a powerful group of people with worldwide influence get together and make decisions, it will have some impact on all.

 

Why g would post in a way that implies she has some grasp on things like this is beyond me, other than purposefully being rude. It's funny how someone who continually talks about her inability to comprehend the simplest of computer/internet skills could presume to have information that would only come from the careful use of it.

 

It is very doubtful that they would view Obama as someone they need include anymore. 

Guide

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to
If you want to be shocked and shaken, read about the UN's agenda 21 and its subsequent updates. It's all connected and it isn't good.
___________________________________________________________________________

2605 Americans were murdered on American soil September 11, 2001. Never forget.

The identity of the murders and their ideology should not be forgotten. Ever.
Guide

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

 

 

gen, so-called "agenda 21" is a "special dream" for a conspiracy theorist

 

And that's all it is,,,although the extreme right wing are using it extremely well to their advantage with those who are alrady convinced.  I wish they would just stop, think, ask questions.

 

What is that old saying,,,well not quite so old

 

QUESTION EVERYTHIING

 

Good advice

 

 

 

The older my grandchildren get the less I can remember.

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

granba wrote:

 

 

gen, so-called "agenda 21" is a "special dream" for a conspiracy theorist

 

And that's all it is,,,although the extreme right wing are using it extremely well to their advantage with those who are alrady convinced.  I wish they would just stop, think, ask questions.

 

What is that old saying,,,well not quite so old

 

QUESTION EVERYTHIING

 

Good advice

 

 

 


Take your own advice...

We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. ABRAHAM LINCOLN

Re: Bilderberg 2014

Why is everyone so testy today?  


beadle_eze as beadle does
Guide

Re: Bilderberg 2014

 

 

larry

granba wrote:

 

 

gen, so-called "agenda 21" is a "special dream" for a conspiracy theorist

 

And that's all it is,,,although the extreme right wing are using it extremely well to their advantage with those who are alrady convinced.  I wish they would just stop, think, ask questions.

 

What is that old saying,,,well not quite so old

 

QUESTION EVERYTHIING

 

Good advice

 

 

 


Take your own advice...

 

----------

granba

what makes you think I don't?

 

The older my grandchildren get the less I can remember.
Guide

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

 

 

beatle

 

Why is everyone so testy today?  

 

 

granba

 

It was just one of those days

One of those whatever the rest of the words are

 

A trip to the moon

and whatever the rest of the words are

 

It was just one of those days.  Smiley Wink

 

The older my grandchildren get the less I can remember.

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

granba wrote:

 

 

larry

granba wrote:

 

 

gen, so-called "agenda 21" is a "special dream" for a conspiracy theorist

 

And that's all it is,,,although the extreme right wing are using it extremely well to their advantage with those who are alrady convinced.  I wish they would just stop, think, ask questions.

 

What is that old saying,,,well not quite so old

 

QUESTION EVERYTHIING

 

Good advice

 

 

 


Take your own advice...

 

----------

granba

what makes you think I don't?

 


According to your siggie you remember less?

We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. ABRAHAM LINCOLN

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

beadle_eze wrote:

Why is everyone so testy today?  


About what exactly?

We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. ABRAHAM LINCOLN

Guide

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

granba

this thng was debunked heck 10=15 years ago.  But why waste a good conspiracy theory when so many people KNEW IT.  

 

This thing that is written was for the UN.  It has nothing to do with anything that would do what you think it says.  BUT for those people who are always looking to increase their fold of "believers" then without the correct interprettation and why it was written, it is perfect for that.

 

personally, I'll waste my time looking at Robert Redford's picture.  Far more conductive to positive things.

 

Now as for a worldwide group getting together...do you mean the UN or  are you talkin about these so-called people who are, will be, implementing this plan?  As i SAID THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR QUITE A WHILE NOW AND nothing HAS CHANGED. As I said, I read it several years ago.  If you are convinced, if you are leaning in that direction, if you just KNEW it, then you will fall for it.  I am here to tell you that other than being a plan for the UN which has nothing to do with what people are using i for (recruiting and control).  There are so many weasel words in it it pretty much doesn't say what people think it says.

 

But have fun.

 

Smiley Happy

 

 

 

 

 

igather

 

Ya know,  I read that response last night and thought about commenting but figured, "why bother?"

 

I don't follow the doings of that group but instinctively I can recognize that when a powerful group of people with worldwide influence get together and make decisions, it will have some impact on all.

 

Why g would post in a way that implies she has some grasp on things like this is beyond me, other than purposefully being rude. It's funny how someone who continually talks about her inability to comprehend the simplest of computer/internet skills could presume to have information that would only come from the careful use of it.

 

It is very doubtful that they would view Obama as someone they need include anymore. 

 

The older my grandchildren get the less I can remember.
Guide

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

 

 

OK I just searched it again using Agenda 21

 

It will bring up wilipedia with a short definiton, and then there are others you can log into but if you read their titles then you will understand.  By all means read the whole thing.  I see FPX is pushing this and Beck.  They must be light on the news to turn to this again.

 

Again, there is an agenda 21 but it isn't what FOX has been saying it is.

 

 

The older my grandchildren get the less I can remember.
Guide

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

 

 

Just go read it.  But be sure you read it as much as possible for what it really is, not  what FOX told you.  In fact when you search it, there will be several others that come up, read those as well.

 

I just hate to see anyone be fooled like this.  It happened enough the last go'round with this thing.

 

The older my grandchildren get the less I can remember.
Thrill-Seeker

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

What is “this thing”?

 

Agenda 21 is a subset of the Bilderberg agenda. Glad you read whatever IT is several years ago, and the world stood still. Wasn’t there a soap opera?

 

By your posts I do not believe you understand who the Bilderbergers are or the impact that entity has.  

 

It, this thing, this plan, without referent is meaningless. I am curious what “This thing was debunked..” and “This thing that is written was for the UN.” is though.

 

Please give me a reason to take your words for IT.

 

“This thing that is written was for the UN.  It has nothing to do with anything that would do what you think it says.  BUT for those people who are always looking to increase their fold of "believers" then without the correct interprettation and why it was written, it is perfect for that.”

 

Do you have any idea how incoherent that is?

 

I had hoped this thread would have been more intelligent and fun while highlighting some of the serious stuff going on. Hope and Change, yanno?

 

The annual meeting of the Bilderbergers has been around since 1954. Skull and Bones has only been around since 1832,

Guide

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

granba wrote:

 

 

Just go read it.  But be sure you read it as much as possible for what it really is, not  what FOX told you.  In fact when you search it, there will be several others that come up, read those as well.

 

I just hate to see anyone be fooled like this.  It happened enough the last go'round with this thing.

 

 

Here is the link to the pdf file of the original Agenda 21 document.  It wasn't written by FOX, or Beck, or some unknown author on wiki.  It can be read in full by anyone that wants to know what it says, although finding a clear meaning in much of the socialist double speak isn't easy.  I don't like it.

 

One more thing, stop telling me that I get my opinions on the news from FOX or any other network.  That is not true.  When possible, I go directly to the source.  When not possible, I read many different sources.  You are insinuating that I am stupid, and I don't like it.

 

http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf

 

 

 

 

___________________________________________________________________________

2605 Americans were murdered on American soil September 11, 2001. Never forget.

The identity of the murders and their ideology should not be forgotten. Ever.
Rockstar

Re: Bilderberg 2014

[ Edited ]
in reply to

You know I've heard references to Bilderberg but never paid it much attention until you posted this.  

 

I find it interesting so far, at least what they are concerned with as I understand it - American exceptionalism.

 

And something I don't understand, if anyone does not find it interesting, it isn't compulsory to read or participate if that is the true objection.



"If it is once again one against forty-eight, then I am very sorry for the forty-eight." ~ Margaret Thatcher

“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” ― Thomas Jefferson

Thrill-Seeker

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

If interested, search “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group”.

 

There’s a long article. Some guy has been researching the group for years. It’s a bit outdated but still, even if partially true, I’m guessing Orwell would be horrified.

Rockstar

Re: Bilderberg 2014

in reply to

The only thing I've read once you posted this thread was on wiki.

 

I'll have to check it out.

 

I hope I'm not putting you on the spot and of course it's your choice, but can you post some things that he writes?  Or what is his name?  And if he is credible, you know not a journalist like the New York Times hires.



"If it is once again one against forty-eight, then I am very sorry for the forty-eight." ~ Margaret Thatcher

“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” ― Thomas Jefferson